By Texas Hong –

Photo from TOC, taken by Chan Zhi Jian, Jeremy.

I was at WP's second rally of this Hougang by-election. Towards the end of it, a heavy downpour descended upon us. Singaporeans from all walks of life, young and old, men and women, stood shoulder to shoulder in the soggy field, in one of the greatest show of solidarity I have ever seen in my life. Strangers became friends, friends became comrades. A woman standing behind me, old enough to be my mother, came over and shared her small umbrella with me. As it was too small for both of us, like all others in the rally, we became totally drenched.

Some of us, including me, were not Hougang voters. Neither were we WP apparatchiks – there was no reason for anyone to be one as it is not because of fear or favour that we turned up for the rally.

Amidst the chanting of “Workers’ Party” and “Huat Ah” that continued to resonate throughout the field, the real reasons why we displayed such behaviour are more than skin deep. It reflects upon our conscience as human beings. This is more than being “emotional” that the PAP had branded WP’s rallies to be. It was a display of our hard headedness against unfairness, and our desire for equality for Hougang residents who are also fellow Singaporeans.

The PAP likes to say that not everyone can be a good speaker and we should look at the substance of the individual. I beg to differ. The only reason why WP has good speakers is because they spoke with conscience and a just cause that all their supporters relate to. I am sure PAP has amongst their ranks brilliant speakers. However, a salesman however skilful cannot transform a Toyota into a Ferrari.

Last night’s atmosphere was similar to that of the voting pattern of Hougang voters over the past twenty years. They have constantly rejected promises of estate upgrading, in exchange for something intangible, something like pride and dignity. They have sacrificed themselves, for the rest of Singapore.

After 46 years of nation building and National Service, many Singaporeans still do not feel at home today. This is caused chiefly by divisions amongst locals and foreigners, income inequality in our society, and in this context – discrimination against opposition held wards.

I have participated in National Day Parades many times as a boy scout and during NS. But trust me, never did I feel more Singaporean than last night. Based on the ruggedness, unity and resilience displayed last night, not as Hougang voters but as Singaporeans, Desmond Choo can never win Hougang with his free porridges and hearing aids.

This article is published by The Online Citizen, 20 Maxwell Road, #09-17 Maxwell House, Singapore 069113.

You May Also Like

Migrant workers will be vaccinated by end of 2021; safety and benefits of vaccine will be communicated to them in their native languages

Singapore’s Second Minister for Manpower Tan See Leng said that COVID-19 vaccine…

The NAC’s remark that The Substation wants autonomy over 45 Armenian Street is “incomplete”, says arts centre

Returning to 45 Armenian Street as co-tenant after renovation works are complete…

人力部将调高就业准证薪金门槛 各界忧“上有政策下有对策”

昨日(26日)人力部宣布,将进一步调整外籍雇员政策,包括提高S准证和就业准证薪金门槛。 人力部长杨莉明,在政府施政方针附录宣称,国人不论年龄、族群获性别,应获得公平就业机会。 但她也指出,外劳政策旨在协助新加坡经济增长、为国人创造更好就业机会。惟政府会定期检讨和调整。 综合本地政治人物、时评员和网民意见,尽管大家都欢迎上述举措,惟提醒“上有政策,下有对策”,必须提防雇主“走漏洞”,政府的机制理应有“街头智慧”,找出并严惩这些老练、迂回政府规定的雇主们。 其中人民党成员欧斯曼(Khan Osman Sulaiman)担忧,人力部上述举措只不过是回应民间愤怒的公关噱头。 “仅仅提升S准证和就业准证薪金门槛,无法保证强大的新加坡核心雇员团队,为本地人制造良好就业机会。” 本月初,人力部揭发47雇主招聘员工未公平对待新加坡人;30金融领域雇主聘请外籍PMET,大部分来自同一国家;再有退休银行家踢爆,一些大型、老牌外籍银行,倾向雇用外籍人士、排挤新加坡人才等,这些事件无不引起坊间哗然。 欧斯曼甚至直言,雇主懂得滥用、迂回就业准证薪金门槛,已是老生常谈。有些雇主甚至被发现,即使雇员的薪水是就业准证等级,但雇主仍能之后向雇员讨回薪资,或是实际给的薪资更少。 故此,若不愿去限制就业准证在本地劳动市场的比例,仍是治标不治本的。 一些网民担忧,一些雇主仍能透过“报大数”,同样高薪资聘请外籍人士,但与外籍雇员协商,领取较少薪资,不失为业界的“潜规则”…