Amos Yee
Amos Yee

Amos Yee has been sentenced to four weeks imprisonment, for charges relating to creating a video criticizing Lee Kuan Yew.

He will serve one week for posting obscene materials and three weeks for wounding the religious feelings of Christian in his video calling Lee Kuan Yew a “horrible person”, and the sentenced is to be served consecutively.

The sentence has also been backdated from 2 June, which means Yee technically goes free today.

Yee also has to go for mandatory counselling, which the teenager has agreed to.

Yee’s medical report said that he does not suffer from any mental disorders, but instead needs mentoring. Amos has agreed to counselling and mentoring from a doctor at Raffles Hospital.

TOC understands that Yee had instructed his lawyer Alfred Dodwell to lodge an appeal to claim that he had not wounded religious feelings or distributed obscene image in the first place.

The Prosecution had decided not to press for reformative training, which will see Yee instituted for at least 18 months, and go for a jail term because of what was described as a “seismic shift” in attitude on Yee’s part.

It was noted that Yee has voluntarily removed the material and signed an undertaking to not post on sensitive issues anymore. “Amos has admitted to his guilt and promised not to re-offend”, said the Prosecution, because he understands issues of law and racial harmony.

Nevertheless, “it is critical to again reiterate that this case is not about freedom of speech or diversity of views”, but about the abuse of these freedoms.

The Prosecution also said that Yee was the one who had chosen the path that led to his time in remand because he breached bail conditions and rejected probation.

Yee’s trial has attracted international attention, with protests held in Singapore’s Hong Lim Park, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Malaysia’s Penang calling for the Singapore government to free him.

International human rights organisations have also labeled Yee a prisoner of conscience.

Free Amos Yee Hong Kong

Yee has thus far served a total of more than 50 days in remand, either at Changi Prison or the Institute of Mental Health for psychiatric assessment.

The Online Citizen understands that he was sent to the Accident & Emergency department of Changi Hospital on Sunday night, but has since returned to IMH today morning.

No reason has been given, but TOC understand from his mother that Yee’s blood glucose level has dropped, he had been feeling giddy and depressed, and had not been eating or sleeping well.

In the course of his trial, various human rights groups have called for his release in respect to the rights of a child.

“The Singapore government has demonstrated a shameful disregard for freedom of expression and the rights of the child in the way it has treated Amos Yee,” said Phil Robertson, Deputy Director of the Asia Division at Human Rights Watch, earlier today. “By holding him in remand and other forms of detention for over 50 days, the authorities have seriously abused his rights for simply voicing political opinions not popular with the government – and calling this a “crime” when his actions should never have been criminalized in the first place.”

“If Amos Yee is sentenced to additional time in a prison or reform training center, this will be yet another incredible injustice to him and mark a further decline in Singapore’s already poor record of respecting free expression. The powers that be in Singapore should recognize that justice can only be served by immediately and unconditionally releasing Amos Yee.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

社论:为何无法公开新保网袭主谋?

昨日,主管网络安全事务的通讯及新闻部长易华仁,在国会针对新保网袭事件指出,尽管已经明确知道发动网袭的主谋,但政府决定不公开袭击者身份,因为“不符合国家利益”。 根据《联合早报》报导,易华仁称“已经采取适当行动,也知道袭击者的身份。”但是基于国家安全理由,他不愿多加置评,却又没说明已经采取了什么“适当行动”。 这与易华仁在去年八月底部长声明有别,他当时说,尽管掌握把握袭击者身份,却无法百分百确定。 也有议员追问,究竟我国对袭击者采取了什么行动?易华仁也遭质问政府不揭露袭击者的考量。 对此,易华仁指出,我国现在并非没有法律对境内袭击者采取行动,而是公开指名道姓,“是否会我国有利。” 与此同时,他又告知议员们不应只专注于为何政府公开袭击者身份,而是要了解政府的反应和应对措施。 银行遭劫  保安被解雇  却不公布劫匪身份? 吊诡的是,新保集团和IHiS公司因为网袭事件被惩戒,被罚款100万元,还有两名IHiS员工还为此丢了饭碗,一些高层则接受被罚款(却未公布罚款金额)。 打个比方形容:一家银行被手段老练的抢匪打抢了,保安人员因为防守不力被解雇、银行经理被罚款,但是打抢银行、仍逍遥法外的犯罪份子,他们的身份却基于“银行利益”必须保密?把钱放入银行的客户也不得而知,究竟是谁抢了银行? 根据个资保护委会的文告,去年发生的新保集团网袭事件历来最严重,导致约150万名病人的个人资料被盗,还有约16万人的门诊配药记录被泄露,当中包括总理李显龙与数名部长的记录。…

Residents at landed properties feel it is unfair to pay for parking outside their houses

“It’s not fair to pay to park outside our own homes”, seems…