skm

The Singapore Kindness Movement (SKM) has issued a statement on 23 April on the reaction to the Amos Yee saga.

SKM lambasted some reactions to Yee’s post.

“Some of us have gone well beyond the bounds of decency, in many cases being more offensive – vulgar and threatening even – than the original post we objected to,” SKM said.

It added:

“Tasteless videos and posts are no excuse for responding with vindictive attacks and threats of unspeakable violence. There is a difference between objecting, however strongly, to something that offends us, and meting out an eye for an eye, or worse.

“Vengeance is not justice. The way we respond to offence can reflect more poorly on ourselves than the original offender.”

Here is the statement in full:

Within the last month, Amos Yee has become the latest in a string of individuals who have exhibited insensitivity and poor judgement with their social media postings.

Let’s review what has transpired: a 16-year-old boy posted a series of insensitive, even disturbing commentaries to the chagrin of a wider community. Instead of addressing the gravity of his actions, what ensued was an escalating raising of pitchforks, people across different ages and backgrounds baying for blood, some literally.

When emotions get the better of us, we lose the sensibility to know where to draw the line. Some of us have gone well beyond the bounds of decency, in many cases being more offensive – vulgar and threatening even – than the original post we objected to.

It is neither a proportionate response, nor the mark of a civilised society.

Tasteless videos and posts are no excuse for responding with vindictive attacks and threats of unspeakable violence. There is a difference between objecting, however strongly, to something that offends us, and meting out an eye for an eye, or worse.

Vengeance is not justice. The way we respond to offence can reflect more poorly on ourselves than the original offender.

We don’t have to be this way.

We can disagree and still remain civil. We can register our objection to an offence, and still do so graciously. We must, if we want to live as a society that is mature in dealing with things we don’t like or agree with.

Subscribe
Notify of
597 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

工作量增倍却取消花红 马国邮差雨天坐地痛哭诉心酸

在疫情蔓延之际,许多行业领域都面临着巨大的挑战,甚至是倒闭的可能,然而仍需维持运作的非递送服务行业莫属。无论是送餐员或是邮寄递送,工作量都大增。马国一名邮差因工作量增加不少,却始终无法获得花红,而坐在雨中路边伤心哭泣。 一名马国网友日前在脸书上分享有关邮差的故事,据他描述,当时该邮差向他递送包裹,包裹交手后邮差接了一通电话,随后便坐在门口哭泣。 当时正值下雨,邮差也因此全身湿透,原先网友以为他正处于失恋,于是让自己的弟弟上前关心。一开始邮差向他透露没事,但在再三询问下,才得知原来朋友来电,表明公司今年没有分派花红。 “去年他还得到了1000元的花红,但今年却什么都没有了,而且今年已经增加了很多工作量,却得不到花红。“ 他在向网友透露后便抱头痛哭,邮差说,花红对他而言相当重要,因为3年前他父亲离世,为了撑起整个家,他必须要还完家中的贷款包括摩托车贷款、房租等等开销, “每个月的工资只有1千多令吉(约3百多元新元),我真的很需要这笔花红。” 对此,网友也为邮差打抱不平,称派发的花红应该要比去年更多,而不是取消。 “难道行管期间快递包裹没有增多吗?假设包裹增多,不就表示赚得更多吗?何况现在油价降低,那为什么没有派发花红给员工?” 网友认为公司不应以冠病19 为借口,而且在行动管制令(MCO)期间,客户反而增倍,所以不应该就此取消花红。 帖文一出立即引起网民热议。截至目前,已获得逾6万按赞、逾2万评论及分享。不少网民在帖文留言,在病毒爆发期间,也就只有前线人员苦苦撑着,不应该牺牲他们的花红,也有希望马国邮政公司能针对事件给予回应。

Actual circuit breaker in Clementi HDB block catches fire during circuit breaker period

A circuit breaker – as in a literal circuit breaker – caught…

NUS asked to explain fee increases despite having huge reserves; it replies it didn't increase this year

On Thursday (15 Aug), a member of the public Ivan Goh Sian…

盛港市镇会办标志设计比赛 开放业余爱好者参与

新成立的盛港市镇会,公开让13岁以上国人来参与该市镇会的标志设计比赛,以便评选出最能代表该市镇会的标志。 该市镇会强调标志设计比赛开放于业余爱好者或对设计有兴趣的学生,而不是专业的设计公司。 得奖者除了所设计标志,将获盛港市镇会采用以外,也能获得500元奖励,以及来自本地设计师Jackson Tan的指导。 盛港市镇会提及,希望新标志能代表盛港这个市镇,以及工人党的价值观。 比赛截止日期为下月13日11.59分前,故此有兴趣参与者宜从速,可提交申请表格和了解比赛细节: 另一方面,原本在上周开审的工人党市镇会诉讼,也在盛港市镇会要求下展延。 该区议员何廷儒,是在本月10日代表盛港市镇会上书高庭,要求诉讼延后至六周后才审理,好让该市镇会有充足时间审视其法律立场。