On Thursday (15 Aug), a member of the public Ivan Goh Sian Lung wrote to ST Forum complaining that despite having billions of dollars in its reserves, NUS continues to increase its tuition fees putting pressure on Singaporeans.
“It shocked me to find out that the National University of Singapore (NUS) has been increasing its tuition fees for Singaporean students every year since 2015,” Mr Goh wrote.
“For example, a graduate student doing a computing research programme admitted in 2015 pays $8,600 a year, while a student in the same programme admitted this year pays $9,500 a year, an increase of 10.5 per cent.”
Mr Goh added that the cost of accommodation and food in NUS’ hostels and residential colleges has also continuously been increased. “All these increases add up and put pressure on Singaporeans,” he said.
At the same time, Mr Goh noted that the reserves of NUS has increased from $8.5 billion in the previous year to $9.5 billion in its financial year that ended in March last year.
“Why are Singaporean students paying more despite NUS’ reserves? Are government tuition grants not sufficient to offset these yearly increases?” he asked NUS.
NUS: We didn’t increase fees this year
Probably fearing it would become an election issue in the upcoming GE that might be detriment to his bosses upstairs, the Senior Vice-Provost of NUS, Prof Bernard Tan Cheng Yian, quickly replied. His reply was published today (‘2019 academic year: No tuition fee hike for most NUS undergrad courses‘, 17 Aug).
Prof Tan started off with the usual motherhood statements saying that NUS is “committed to providing an affordable, high-quality education to all our students, regardless of their financial background”.
He revealed that presently, Singaporean students only pay about 25 per cent of the total cost of an undergraduate education.
“Tuition fees are reviewed annually to factor in cost inflation and to maintain the relevance and quality of education. Any fee increases will affect only new cohorts and not current students. Notwithstanding, for the 2019 academic year, most of our undergraduate courses did not see any increase in tuition fees,” he said.
“Further, lower-income students can apply for various bursaries to further defray course fees. These include Ministry of Education-funded bursaries as well as those funded by NUS through our fund-raising efforts.”
In 2018, 28 per cent of students or about 8,800 undergraduates received scholarships and financial aid, he disclosed. Of the 8,800, more than 90 per cent paid less than $5,000 in tuition fees with a third (about 3,000) paying no tuition fees at all, he said.
With Prof Tan’s disclosure, that means 22,600 students last year had to pay more than $8,000 in tuition fees.

It’s not known what NUS is doing about the huge reserves it has garnered over the years. Perhaps earning higher interests to pay people like Prof Tan?
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Play excerpt rejected for publication due to "defensiveness" after TSWL: Alfian Sa'at

By Alfian Sa’at So I sent an excerpt from my play ‘1987’ for…

Accessibility ramp at WP ward finally opens after years; WP's Pritam Singh questions policy of PAP candidates as grassroots advisers

The barrier-free-access (BFA) ramp at Blk 108 Bedok Reservoir Road is now…

杨莉明立志助失业者回岗位 首先她得正视职场歧视问题

人力部长杨莉明,周三(20日)在脸书上重申,政府的首要任务是保住国人饭碗,帮助失业新加坡人回到工作岗位上。 她表示,“为了实现目标,我们正协助雇主,提供他们强而有力的支持,让他们发展成为新加坡的中流砥柱。” 与此同时,她也呼吁,雇主在接受政府的援助时必须发挥其作用,确保公平雇佣。该建议也获得新加坡工商联合总会、四个商会与商团的响应,并表示将会“循序渐进”实施方案,确保达到公平聘雇原则。 有改善意愿 惟歧视聘雇从未停止 理想虽然很丰满,但现实却也很“骨感”,对新加坡人而言,职场上歧视聘雇却未曾停止过。 举个例子,去年10月,《海峡时报》发表一篇专题,探讨究竟劳资政三方公平与良好雇佣联盟(TAFEP)如何处理一些雇主的不公平雇佣情况,其中一例就出现“内定”的情况。 据报道指出,一家金融保险公司被该公司的人事经理曝出,在招聘前就预选了一名外国人士到本地公司担任管理职务。 然而,经调查后发现,该公司依旧按照公平考量框架规定,在全国职业库(Jobs Bank)刊登了14天的招聘广告,但是在招聘广告“到期”之前,就已和“内定”的外国籍人士人选,签订雇佣合约。 值得关注是,”内定“人才是该公司位于伦敦办公室的英国籍人士,且他的工作经验和学历,根本不符合广告上所列明的需求! 进一步调查后发现,招聘广告获得了超过60份申请,其中有28人士都符合资格,却未有任何申请人士被邀请面试。…

Nursing homes eating Government payouts?

By Leong Sze Hian I refer to the article “Govt Payouts a…