A priest is dying. On his deathbed, he asks to see a property developer and a lawyer.

Both of them arrive timely to see him.

“We are very touched that you remember us at the end of your journey.” They tell the priest.

The priest gasps, holding tightly the hands of the developer and the lawyer.

“All my life I’ve been following the footsteps of my Lord. And I want every phase of my life to be like Jesus Christ, including my death. That’s why it is important to have both of you here.”

“What do you mean?” The developer and the lawyer are puzzled.

“When Jesus was dying on the cross, he was accompanied by two thieves – one on his left, and the other on his right.”

Some of you might have seen this joke before.

uncompleted_projectMy mother can’t agree with this more. Two weeks ago, I re-told her sad story to the forty participants at the How to Buy Good Quality Properties 1-Day Workshop: During the property boom, mom bought an overpriced brand new property with her life savings. Both the surrounding environment and unit layout had much room for improvement. The actual unit turned out to have shrunk so much in size that it was unrecognizable from what she remembered showing in the sales brochure. It also had countless developer defects that were unfixed after a long wait.

Personally, I have never bought new launch projects at the peak of the market at “future prices”. Nor have I been stuck in a difficult lawsuit that keeps draining my hard-earned money. I am fortunate to finally find a good conveyancing lawyer who is a Christian himself.

We can’t deny the fact that we do have honest property developers around dedicated to build good quality projects and market them at reasonable prices. However, like any industry, you just can’t avoid seeing some black sheep every now and then.

When you are buying off-plan in an uncompleted project, whether it is local or overseas, do you have the knowledge and experience to tell a good developer from the bad one?

You may find it useful to refer to the abstract below from the article “Developers: how to tell the good from the bad” in my book No B. S. Guide to Property Investment.

When evaluating a developer, always look for three things: experience, reputation and attitude.

1. Past experience

Study the history of the developer. Sometimes the company is a subsidiary of a big developer, or a joint venture of a few players in the industry.

Check the references or past projects of the developer. How many similar projects have they built in the past? Do they specialize in commercial or residential development? Is property their new venture outside their core business? Is this the first project of an overseas developer?

Beware of ‘one-time builders’ who try their hands on properties when the market looks lucrative. They might not have the ability to cope with unforeseeable situations in the future.

2. Company reputation

If you want to understand more about a developer, look for complaints from owners in their past projects. Conduct secondary research in newspaper archives and you will find a list of projects with different complaints on poor workmanship, building defects, missing floor area, etc. (Note: Please refer to my book No B.S. Guide to Property InvestmentTable 3.4 Past projects with building defects or owner complaints)

I am not saying that it is all the developers’ fault. The percentage of problem cases may be small compared with the projects they have built. To be fair, sometimes it is the supplier, the contractor or the architect who gets the developer into trouble.

Nonetheless, the best time to put a company to test is always the time when things go wrong. The most important thing to look for is the response from the developer and the way they handle the matter.

How fast did they take action? Did they live up to their promises? Did they just shrink from their responsibility and simply put the blame on others? Did they only soften their stand when the management committee puts the case in court?

3. Vision and attitude

Does the developer have the vision to differentiate from other industry players by building the best-in-class projects? Or is it just another developer who is there to reap the maximum profit from home buyers?

The sincerity of a developer is all reflected in the details. A good developer focuses on every single detail of the development. It sets high standard in construction, offers professional workmanship, and provides good quality fixtures. It is the superior product that makes it worthwhile for buyers to pay a premium price.

Hope you have taken some hints about how to pick a good developer. Good luck in your property hunting!

This article was first published at propertysoul.com and is not an advertorial 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

盛港市镇会办标志设计比赛 开放业余爱好者参与

新成立的盛港市镇会,公开让13岁以上国人来参与该市镇会的标志设计比赛,以便评选出最能代表该市镇会的标志。 该市镇会强调标志设计比赛开放于业余爱好者或对设计有兴趣的学生,而不是专业的设计公司。 得奖者除了所设计标志,将获盛港市镇会采用以外,也能获得500元奖励,以及来自本地设计师Jackson Tan的指导。 盛港市镇会提及,希望新标志能代表盛港这个市镇,以及工人党的价值观。 比赛截止日期为下月13日11.59分前,故此有兴趣参与者宜从速,可提交申请表格和了解比赛细节: 另一方面,原本在上周开审的工人党市镇会诉讼,也在盛港市镇会要求下展延。 该区议员何廷儒,是在本月10日代表盛港市镇会上书高庭,要求诉讼延后至六周后才审理,好让该市镇会有充足时间审视其法律立场。

民主党达曼胡理:民众已厌倦和抵制旧有政治模式

民主党成员达曼胡理直言,旧有的政治模式让新加坡人愈发反感和抵制。 达曼胡理昨日(21日)在脸书上发文形容,仍有顽固的双重标准拒绝离开,因为旧有政治拒绝从既得利益中改革。 他也表示,人民行动党必须推翻过去才能达到改变,与时并进,避免过时。他说,“终有一天传统铁票会离开,如果这种情况真的发生,它也只能怪自己。” 达曼胡理也表示,如今人民行动党若想依赖新公民的票数,以此取代传统票,将会是一把双刃剑,如同执政政府创造的集选区制度一样。 他续指,从其他国家的调查可发现,刚加入的新公民,大约二至三届选举,都会投向执政党派。但当他们明智地意识到,自己和本国公民都同样身陷困境时,他们就会选择改变,或离开。 总的来说,达曼胡理强调,最终决定权还是会落在土生土长的本国公民身上,因为无论如何,他们都会选择留在自己的国家。 “或许会需要一段时间,但它最终将会发生,因为平衡才是常态。这不是高端的学问,而是生命循环的本质。” 达曼胡理连同民主党成员方月光、林文兴、江伟贤等人于今年大选中角逐马西岭-油池集选区,对战人民行动党的黄循财、任梓铭、扎吉哈、苏慧民等人,最终人民行动党以63.18巴仙对36.82巴仙得票率,拿下该集选区。

Returning travellers reminded to pay GST for goods exceeding $600

Going for an overseas trip soon? Please be reminded that all goods brought…

王瑞杰:房产可传给下一代 剩40年屋契组屋仍有价值

财政部长王瑞杰坚称,公共组屋单位在屋主年满85岁后仍有价值,组屋居民绝不是“租户”,他们还可以将房产传给下一代。 根据《今日报》(TodayOnline)指出,王瑞杰强调,25岁的新加坡人购买了新的公共组屋,当屋主达到国人平均寿命,也就是年满85岁时,他的组屋仍然有超过30年屋契。 自2017年3月以来,公共组屋的屋契问题一直都是热门议题。居民发现,他们的组屋单位屋契满99年,屋价归零且可能要还给政府。 在回应博纳产业总裁伊斯迈(Ismail Gafoor)有关这个“非常政治化”的课题时,王瑞杰解释说,公共组屋的居民不仅仅是房客,因为他们仍然可以选择将房产传给他们的孩子。 如同总理李显龙和国家发展部长黄循财,王瑞杰也打保票,声言老龄组屋仍有价值。然而,他并没有进一步详细说明。 在本社去年8月的一篇文章,本地房地产专家提醒国人需改变买房的思维。他认为至今民众仍被灌输“买”组屋成为“屋主”的观念,但实际上那些买下新组屋者,形同是付还了99年份的租金。 降温措施保护本地市场 王瑞杰是出席博纳产业(PropNex)年度大会时,发表以上谈话。博纳产业(PropNex)年度大会谈及了该机构在2018年的业绩,他们成功创造了4.315亿新元的创纪录收入。 伊斯迈总裁表示,能够取得创纪录收入部分原因是因为与前年数字相比,房地产经纪人增加了13巴仙,总数超过7500人。 尽管如此,在政府于2018年7月实施降温措施后,房地产市场已经大幅放缓。 王瑞杰表示,此措施是控制“非常不理性”市场的方式之一,并确保买家不会因为“市场亢奋”(irrational…