A priest is dying. On his deathbed, he asks to see a property developer and a lawyer.

Both of them arrive timely to see him.

“We are very touched that you remember us at the end of your journey.” They tell the priest.

The priest gasps, holding tightly the hands of the developer and the lawyer.

“All my life I’ve been following the footsteps of my Lord. And I want every phase of my life to be like Jesus Christ, including my death. That’s why it is important to have both of you here.”

“What do you mean?” The developer and the lawyer are puzzled.

“When Jesus was dying on the cross, he was accompanied by two thieves – one on his left, and the other on his right.”

Some of you might have seen this joke before.

uncompleted_projectMy mother can’t agree with this more. Two weeks ago, I re-told her sad story to the forty participants at the How to Buy Good Quality Properties 1-Day Workshop: During the property boom, mom bought an overpriced brand new property with her life savings. Both the surrounding environment and unit layout had much room for improvement. The actual unit turned out to have shrunk so much in size that it was unrecognizable from what she remembered showing in the sales brochure. It also had countless developer defects that were unfixed after a long wait.

Personally, I have never bought new launch projects at the peak of the market at “future prices”. Nor have I been stuck in a difficult lawsuit that keeps draining my hard-earned money. I am fortunate to finally find a good conveyancing lawyer who is a Christian himself.

We can’t deny the fact that we do have honest property developers around dedicated to build good quality projects and market them at reasonable prices. However, like any industry, you just can’t avoid seeing some black sheep every now and then.

When you are buying off-plan in an uncompleted project, whether it is local or overseas, do you have the knowledge and experience to tell a good developer from the bad one?

You may find it useful to refer to the abstract below from the article “Developers: how to tell the good from the bad” in my book No B. S. Guide to Property Investment.

When evaluating a developer, always look for three things: experience, reputation and attitude.

1. Past experience

Study the history of the developer. Sometimes the company is a subsidiary of a big developer, or a joint venture of a few players in the industry.

Check the references or past projects of the developer. How many similar projects have they built in the past? Do they specialize in commercial or residential development? Is property their new venture outside their core business? Is this the first project of an overseas developer?

Beware of ‘one-time builders’ who try their hands on properties when the market looks lucrative. They might not have the ability to cope with unforeseeable situations in the future.

2. Company reputation

If you want to understand more about a developer, look for complaints from owners in their past projects. Conduct secondary research in newspaper archives and you will find a list of projects with different complaints on poor workmanship, building defects, missing floor area, etc. (Note: Please refer to my book No B.S. Guide to Property InvestmentTable 3.4 Past projects with building defects or owner complaints)

I am not saying that it is all the developers’ fault. The percentage of problem cases may be small compared with the projects they have built. To be fair, sometimes it is the supplier, the contractor or the architect who gets the developer into trouble.

Nonetheless, the best time to put a company to test is always the time when things go wrong. The most important thing to look for is the response from the developer and the way they handle the matter.

How fast did they take action? Did they live up to their promises? Did they just shrink from their responsibility and simply put the blame on others? Did they only soften their stand when the management committee puts the case in court?

3. Vision and attitude

Does the developer have the vision to differentiate from other industry players by building the best-in-class projects? Or is it just another developer who is there to reap the maximum profit from home buyers?

The sincerity of a developer is all reflected in the details. A good developer focuses on every single detail of the development. It sets high standard in construction, offers professional workmanship, and provides good quality fixtures. It is the superior product that makes it worthwhile for buyers to pay a premium price.

Hope you have taken some hints about how to pick a good developer. Good luck in your property hunting!

This article was first published at propertysoul.com and is not an advertorial 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

“文明社会不惩处公民私人评论” 李绳武称已缴付罚款

因为2017年7月的一则脸书贴文,批评我国政府“好诉讼” (ligitious),法庭制度“温顺” (pliant),李显扬之子李绳武,遭总检察署起诉藐视法庭。 上月29日,高庭裁决李绳武藐视法庭罪名成立,判罚款1万5000元,或一周监禁。 对于这项诉讼,李绳武在个人脸书更新资讯,称他已决定缴付罚款,以换来耳根清净。“缴付罚款,可避免给新加坡政府有便宜的借口,来攻击我和我的家人。” 但他强调,这并不代表他认罪,也不会否认在私人帖文中公开给友人的文字,坚称他写的东西并没有触法。再者,一个文明社会,不该因为公民的私人评论谈及司法系统,就因此以言入罪。 他重申,尽管政府声称他的私人贴文“丑化司法机构”,但他认为,滥用国家资源打压个人言论,才是真正的丑事。 “在为期三年的诉讼,新加坡总检察署写了千页法律文件、撤销我辩护宣誓书(defence affidavit)中的一些部分、还要求我公开我在脸书上所有的朋友。” 李绳武早在今年1月,已选择不参与这项诉讼,“不抬举总检察署所作所为”。然而即使他没参与,还是花了半年时间才有诉讼结果,“拖沓得足以使政府处理疫情失当、还召开选举。”

Radicality – The Singaporean Youth?

  By Eddie Choo Monday, 11 December, 2006 Numbers may be an…

竞选期间坊间选民积极反映观点 符策涫乐见狮城政治新时代

工人党党魁毕丹星和林瑞莲国会助理符策涫,个别在脸书分享与选民们的互动,例如毕丹星称,工人党才更应该百倍地向选民致谢,也感谢选民们十年来都热情好客。 毕丹星是在昨日贴文提及,一些选民不满,为何此次工人党团队胜选后没有乘罗厘向选民谢票,他也解释基于当前对疫情管控,选举局也不允许各政党的这种谢票方式。 选民告诉他“我们只想感谢工人党”,然而毕丹星分享,在他的想法,工人党才更应该百倍地向选民们致谢。 他也有感而发,2011年第一次当该区议员时,还不知道选民会如何待他,但从那时候开始,选民们都很热情好客。十年以来也认识了近邻的友诺士居民,看着他们成长变化,或是在巴刹遇到他们。 司机摇下车窗为工人党打气 至于符策涫则分享竞选期与选民们的互动,包括有时等交通灯过马路,会有司机鸣笛,让他误以为交通灯已经转绿了,但司机们则摇下车窗高喊“工人党”,给工人党团队打气。 他说在巴士上也常遇到民众询问工人党在一些议题上的议题和看法;走在街上民众也会主动讨论,与他们相关的议题和孩子们的问题,“对于我们如何形塑国家未来,我们有许多交心的讨论,建设一个对国人有益的机制。” 曾在选举上阵东海岸集选区的符策涫认为,这显示新加坡政治的新时代,我们如何应对逆境、接纳新的议题是很重要的,国人也不再接受维持现状,他们更愿意发表意见和采取行动。 他相信8月24日召开国会将是新的里程碑,10位工人党议员和两位非选区议员,形成独立以来最强大的替代阵营,而工人党也会继续参与激烈辩论和审查政府政策。 他也指出,实则工人党已提出许多替代政策包括冗员保险、最低薪金制和减少班级规模以提升学习效率等。 符策涫坦言,要挑战现任执掌公共职务者,形同攀越大山,但工人党收集来自基层的想法,并且愿意和勇敢站出来的志愿者们,一起为更好的政策和未来群策群力。所以“没有不可能的任务”。

Face to Face 2: Presidential Forum video Part 1

Photos by Shawn Danker and Terry Xu/ Watch Part 2 HERE. Transcripts…