Chinatown 1955
Chinatown 1955
Chinatown 1955

By Min Cheong

Some time ago, my father let me in on an exchange that took place between him and Lee Kuan Yew – a story I found fascinating for a myriad of reasons.

It was 1978, and Dad was a Captain in the Armed Forces. He was asked by the Permanent Secretary of Defence of that era, George Bogaars, to deliver a suitcase to LKY, who at that time was based in Harvard University.

After a flight and a train ride, my dad met LKY and presented the briefcase to him. The inspection of the document contained inside was almost cursory, but the conversation which ensued was much more intriguing and of consequence.

He invited my dad to take a walk with him in the varsity gardens, and sought his opinion on a matter of national security. After pondering over the issue for a while and coming to a difficult but necessary decision, he handed my dad two orange frisbees, saying, “Please give this to my sons”.

It was a story that to me was intimately revealing; epitomising LKY as an iconic statesman faced with profound challenges in the position and responsibilities he had taken on, as well as a man who was constantly preoccupied with love, concern and affection for his family. It changed the regard I held him in; compelling me to see him as a multifaceted person, not too different from the rest of us beneath style and status.

On another occasion, my dad shared his experience helping to establish the Air Force from – well, one could say – the ground up. He was tasked with scouring the boneyard in Arizona (Davis Monthan Air Base) for military aircraft we could use to get our Air Force up and running.

He returned upon selecting a batch of Skyhawks, and told me that Dr Goh Keng Swee was rather pleased, to say the least. After one particular meeting, Dr Goh left the conference room clutching a model of the Skyhawk, stating, “My Air Force!” with palpable pride and passion.

The civil servants of yesteryear were collectively the soul of Singapore. Their dedication, conviction, zeal, and – on many occasions – their absolute refusal to be sycophants, breathed life into the nation and fire from its belly.

I’ve told close friends how much my dad’s anecdotes have influenced my socio-political views; how deep my connection to this country has become (which is why I engage in such heated debates on policy with those around me – and I don’t often agree with the establishment), and how much more enchanted with our real national historical narrative I am as a result.

This is also why I was glad that in his eulogy, PM Lee heralded the contributions of his father and his father’s team – because my prevailing sentiment all throughout the week was that much as we have shown respect and demonstrated gratitude to LKY, we have in our somewhat unenlightened reverence of the man cast a light so bright on his legacy (perhaps a version that doesn’t truly embody all his deeds, at that) that many others who have contributed so significantly to our nation have had to contend with lying in the shadows.

So in his passing, while we mourn the loss of a leader who was – whether we agree with his policies or not – a visionary, force to have been reckoned with and formidable strategist, it’s as good a time as any to begin delving deeper into history to find our place in the world as Singaporeans.

Ask questions, such as – who was Albert Winsemius, how did he shape the nation-state, why did he never feature in our textbooks, and why is the only tribute to him a small lane in the Sunset Way estate that leads to a refuse dump?

Search for stories, because they’re all around us – in our architecture, landscape, cuisine, culture, geopolitical environment, political milieu, and most powerfully and heartwarmingly, in our collective experience and individual endeavours.

Because LKY’s team wasn’t just comprised of his Cabinet ministers and the civil service at large – it was a team of every single Singaporean who empowered themselves to make Singapore what it is now.

This is what our national rhetoric should be.

Subscribe
Notify of
27 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【选举】被指破坏“君子协议”攻杨厝港 梁文辉澄清前进党革新党无正式协议

昨日,革新党主席朱来成发文指责,前进党未能遵循与该党秘书长肯尼斯的“君子协议”,执意要攻打杨厝港。 他指出,杨厝港单选区原本就是宏茂桥的一部分,且该党本就应有在该区上阵的权利。 他称,秉持反对党团结精神,革新党让出西海岸集选区,避免三角战,前进党也献议让出包括义顺等议席,且他指后者(前进党)也知道,革新党有意在宏茂桥、杨厝港和拉丁马士上阵。 前进党今日公布有意角逐四个集选区和五个单选区,其中就包括杨厝港。 不过,前进党助理秘书长梁文辉,在今日(26日)的线上记者会上,就澄清该党在杨厝港选区上并未有任何正式协议。 他指出,尽管他都有联系肯尼斯,但实则两党间未有达成任何正式协议。“一开始我就与肯尼斯先生联系,过程中有序都哟富有成果和坦率地讨论,他是位绅士,我们交换了许多想法。” 但梁文辉也指出,任何概念和建议都需要得到党中委的同意,遗憾的是两党间并没有达成任何正式的协议。 梁文辉表示,若当中出现任何误会,也对肯尼斯和革新党表达歉意,希望对方停止攻击陈清木和前进党。

Singaporean artists poke fun at Ho Ching and Rosmah during fundraising dinner

A video has been circulating online showcasing a snippet of a skit…

TOC Editorial: A stronger political will may solve our transport woes

TOC Editorial/ The public transport operators (PTO) have made application for fare…

Clearing the Haze: Summary and where we are right now

“Clearing the Haze” is a feature series by The Online Citizen that…