Local dog welfare group, Save Our Street Dog (SOSD) indicated in a Facebook post that Channel News Asia had edited the views of its outreach officer during the interview about the case of the Bukit Batok rats, making it seem as if SOSD placed the blame on the dog feeders for the rat infestation found at the hill next to the Bukit Batok MRT station.
SOSD claims that the final news report by CNA cut out most of the officer’s replies and clarifications to the news agency’s questions and only left the first part, which was used to fit CNA’s agenda.
The interview with the outreach officer, Ms Cheong Mei Yi, at 01:19 of the video below.
[youtube id=”tRz2od7U8ao” align=”center” mode=”normal”] SOSD expressed its disappointment with the incident and hope that it is able to negotiate a middle ground so that dogs at the site will be not be culled by the relevant authorities.
For the past few days, government authorities and media have been leaning towards  the explanation that the food from dog feeders caused the rat infestation at the hill. However, observers have noted that there are also other food sources in the nearby vicinity, such as coffeeshops and supermarkets.
Mr Tan Cheng Bock, president candidate 2011 and former MP have also spoken on this issue and proposed that food stalls might be a concern when it comes to rat infestation.

dog food CNA pest control
Dog food said to be left by dog feeders – Photo: Star Pest Control
CNA had also reported that bags of dog food, estimated at 10 kg in weight, were found by the Pest Control Specialists at the rat infested hill.
Below is the post by SOSD in full.

There has been much attention on the stray dogs at Bukit Batok this past week.
A report on rat infestation broke out, prompting calls for a pest controller to exterminate the rats. Unfortunately, the rats are not the only ones that will be affected. Measures have also been stepped up to remove the stray dogs there. Four puppies have already been caught with more trapping planned. Rat poison is also being used, which, if ingested by the dogs, will cause them to die a slow and painful death.
Feeding of the stray dogs is blamed for the rat infestation. So now there is pressure to get rid of the dogs as well. From what we know, however, the stray dog feeders in Bukit Batok feed responsibly, taking care to clear up so that no rubbish is left behind. We do not know, however, if there others who have been leaving food there.
Channel News Asia interviewed SOSD’s Outreach Officer Meiyi about the stray dog feeding two days ago. In her interview, she was asked the situation in Bukit Batok, and how to feed responsibly.
Meiyi responded that stray dogs feeding is perfectly fine. You can prepare food, do your rounds, and feed the strays, but you have to come back and clear the remains that the dogs did not finish because that would actually bring about pests such as cockroaches and rats. We do not know if people leave food there. However, this is also a hill, and the dogs are difficult to reach, hence cleaning up can be difficult. Stray dog feeders are volunteers who fork out their money and time for the dogs, and cannot be blamed entirely. Education is important – the public should be educated to be more tolerant towards the strays dogs. Trap, Neuter, Release will be the best and most humane of keeping the stray numbers in check, not catching and culling.
We are disappointed that most of what Meiyi said got cut off except the first part, to be in line with the tone of the whole story, hence giving the impression that she was putting blame on the stray dogs feeders. Meiyi has been a stray dog feeder for several years, and her heart goes out to the feeders in Bukit Batok.
Our minds are on the pitiful stray dogs in Bukit Batok. We hope to be able to negotiate a middle ground, so that they may be shown some mercy. There are many solutions such as designating a feeding point to ensure cleanliness, and of course, sterilising the dogs to keep the population stable.
The first step to solving this is to contact the stray dog feeders, so that we have a collective voice. If you are a feeder in Bukit Batok MRT, or know the feeders, please contact us. Email us at: [email protected]

Subscribe
Notify of
7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【舆论】杨莉明续任人力部长 其治下客工宿舍疫情、PMET议题惹诟病

我国7月25日宣布新届内阁名单,杨莉明续任人力部长一职,引起各界关注,因为她在处理客工宿舍疫情爆发一事,无法有效遏制疫情而遭诟病。 早在2月份时,就有客工确诊,包括实里达航空岭感染群;然而,如今新加坡的确诊人数持续攀升,杨莉明仍没有选择向公众道歉,并承认政府的疏失,而是拒绝道歉,因为她声称,要求当局道歉的客工,她一个也没遇上。 显然任何成年人给出这样的理由就已经令人震惊,更何况是身为部长,竟然给出这样的借口,简直让人难以相信。如今新加坡确诊人数持续攀升,但杨莉明仍然保住官位,请问公共责任在哪里? 撇开客工的问题不谈,人力部长杨莉明再次因专业人士、经理、执行员和技师(PMET)课题被抨击,即没有将外国PMET聘雇人数减少而引起争议。公平考量框架(Fair Consideration Framework)于2014年生效,以此增加新加坡人的劳动力,但外国PMET人数仍然未有锐减的现象。 人力部日前宣布47名雇主由于涉嫌出现歧视性聘雇的现象,已被列入公平考量框架的观察名单。 “我们会对招聘标准进行更严格的审查,以确保本地雇主不会出现国籍偏见,这是无法接受的,同时也符合公平、基于业绩的招聘。” 人力部还宣布将会针对240家涉嫌不遵守条规或可能预先聘雇外国人的公司进行调查。 这一切看似很好,但它显然已是存在许久的课题。事实上,已有在野党和其他媒体不断强调,而公平考量框架建立迄今已有六年之久,为何聘雇人数仍未锐减,是否缺乏其政治意愿? 虽然人力部如今不断强调会严格审查他们(外国人)的就业准证申请,让不合作或执意不改变的雇主削减他们的工作准证特权,但人力部正以何种评估标准对他们?难道就不应该设立一个客观和透明的标准,确保公平和问责性吗? 承上所述,无论是客工确诊病例持续递增或是外国PMET数量未有减少,均在杨莉明的监督下,但她的存在也似有若无,所以为何她仍然能够持续领导这部门?…

Dr Chee Soon Juan speaks about plans to aid residents in financial, social issues

Before embarking on his round of cycling across Bukit Batok on 2…

Stop Haze and Save Lives

The following opinion piece was submitted by PM.Haze (People’s Movement to Stop…

【选举】林绍权宣布退选

人民行动党推出的准候选人之一林绍权备受群众质疑,遭网民抨击实为“精英主义者”,且“很好练”。尽管林已在今日(27日)中午发文回应,不过在晚间即宣布不再参加此次选举。 昨日就有网民发起网络联署,”拒绝林绍权出战2020选举“,短短两天内就累计超过1万5000人联署,截至晚间9时许更突破两万人;不过仍有一些与林绍权相熟的友人或同事,站出来为他辩解。 他原本在裕廊选区基层服务了一段时日,但自从24日亮相后,这位吉宝岸外与海事总经理,却被一些网民起底,有者指 指林在新加坡武装部队服务时“表现得高高在上”,与其展现的朴实形象不符合。 另一名自称是林绍权新加坡理工学院同窗,兼吉宝岸外公司同事的网民,更指林绍权“傲慢且冷漠无情”。 据知目前行动党已接受了林的辞呈,相信会再委派其他候选人参选。林绍权称问心无愧,但为了不干扰行动党竞选布局,而选择退选。