The following opinion piece was submitted by PM.Haze (People’s Movement to Stop Haze) / 人民抗烟霾行动.

Earlier this year at a primary school, we asked students if they remembered the 2015 haze. A boy mustered up enough courage to say “my grandfather died”. Turns out the haze may be deadlier than we thought. A new study released on Monday estimated that 100,300 people in Southeast Asia died prematurely due to the haze last year; the number of premature deaths in Singapore is estimated at 2,200. Although this figure was refuted by the Ministry of Health (MOH), it is an undeniable fact that haze as a type of air pollution has an impact on health. The study also poses a serious question to all of us in Singapore: why should we live with the deadly smoke when we have the means to stop it?

Haze is the symptom of a string of environmental and social crisis created ultimately by the increasing demand of crops like palm oil. Indonesia currently has 8.1 million hectares of oil palm plantations, and total acreage is projected to reach 13 million hectares by 2020. The increasing demand for palm oil drives unsustainable expansion of plantations marred with deforestation, peat drainage, burning and land conflict. While the Indonesian government took commendable measures to stop the fires, the majority of our own Singaporean businesses involved in the palm oil supply chain, especially the palm oil buyers, have not taken action to stop the haze.

An enticing solution to the haze problem is to boycott palm oil. However, palm oil is 5-8 times more productive than other oil crops such as canola. Switching to other oil crop would mean we need more land and we will clear more forests. And that’s not what we want. Instead, we should use haze-free palm oil. Haze-free palm oil is simply palm oil produced without burning and deforestation. At the moment, palm oil that’s certified by the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) is the closest to being haze-free. However, RSPO-labelled products are still largely unavailable to consumers in Singapore. Therefore getting companies to use RSPO-certified palm oil is the first step towards being haze-free.

In Singapore, palm oil is the main ingredient of cooking oil used by restaurants and hawkers. It is mostly labelled as “vegetable oil”, as if we squeeze it out from bok choy. Back in July this year, the volunteers at People’s Movement to Stop Haze (PM.Haze) embarked on an investigation project to find out the use of palm oil in our favourite restaurants. We visited 33 outlets of famous restaurant chains along Orchard road, including those in Takashimaya, Paragon and Somerset 313. To our surprise, 32 out of 33 use palm oil for cooking. We also surveyed the edible oil businesses and found that five can supply RSPO-certified cooking oil in Singapore with additional costs of 6-10%. Comparing with the amount of oil used in each end product, the difference in cost is negligible. IKEA Singapore already switched to 100% RSPO-certified cooking oil in their restaurants last year. Therefore businesses can switch to RSPO-certified cooking oil and reap in reputational benefit.

While people in Singapore suffer from the haze, our own Singaporean businesses should no longer be complicit in the crime, especially when relatively low cost solutions exist. After the investigation, we spoke to many businesses that use palm oil, but most were reluctant to switch to RSPO-certified palm oil, citing the lack of consumer awareness and demand. We realised that consumers have to voice out their support for haze-free palm oil in order to drive change in the businesses. As a result, PM.Haze recently launched a campaign to raise awareness of haze-free palm oil and to call for restaurants to go haze-free. In just the first few days of the campaign, it has attracted the support of over 20 Singapore-based organisations and more than 300 individuals. It is now up to the businesses of Singapore to show that they care about their customers and our common environment.

Find out more about the #GoHazeFree campaign at pmhaze.org. FB: www.facebook.com/pmhaze

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

马国部长称仍有权重新检讨原水价格

马来西亚水源、土地及天然资源部长西维尔表明,尽管马方已经失去了在1987年至2012年期间检讨水供价格的资格,但马方仍有权重新检讨。 综合媒体报道,马国总检察署已证实,根据1962年水供协议第14条文,在协议签署后,每年仍可检讨水供价格。 日前马方认为,把生水以每1000加仑3分的价格卖给我国,水源价格过低。 而马哈迪自去年5月再次出任首相以来,已多次提出重新检讨新马水供协定,根据1962年新马水供协定,双方在协定签署后的25年可重新检讨协定条款,而马方则在1987年选择不调整水价,因而失去检讨水价的权利。 西维尔表示,“希望新加坡政府能够接受并商讨这项课题,我们需要这么做,因为水价相当不合理,与其他国家相比,也显得太便宜。 他续指,目前水源、土地及天然资源部已准备针对此事与新加坡当局会面,政府将深入研究过这个议题,确保双方从此获得正面和积极的影响。

The PTC should stand with commuters on fare issue

By Andrew Loh – This Thursday, the Public Transport Council (PTC) will…

European Union calls on Singapore authorities to halt execution of Muhammad Ridzuan

The European Union Delegation to Singapore has just issued the following statement…