natasfair2014_01
Image from NATAS
24 travel agencies have come together and will be organising a travel fair on 27 to 29 March next year which will clash with the dates of the travel fair which National Association of Travel Agents Singapore (NATAS) will be having.
The 24 travel agencies which are also NATAS members said that the decision to pull out from the NATAS’s travel fair has not been easy said the travel agencies but is a “worthy in pursuit of a right cause”.
Agencies which have pulled out from NATAS’s travel fair include “Big Four” – Chan Brothers Travel, CTC Travel, Dynasty Travel and SA Tours – as well as other major players like Nam Ho Travel, Farmosa Holidays, MISA Travel, Apple Holidays and New Shan Travel.
The separate travel fair by the 24 travel agencies will be held at Marina Bay Sands, Level B2 at Exhibition Halls D, E and F, and will span 17,000 sqm, about 70 per cent the size of the NATAS fair.
The separate travel fair is said to have lower booth costs for exhibitors, with savings of up to 30 per cent as compared to the travel fair organised by NATAS and its central location.  While NATAS fair charges a S$4 entrance fee, admission to the trade show organised by the travel agencies is free.
The cost savings by the exhibitors and free admission is said to benefit the consumers.
The group said that the move is not meant to challenge NATAS but was a result of NATAS not addressing the issues which they had about the travel fair organised by the association.
Their issues, which were raised in a petition to NATAS in October this year, included a request for lower rental fees for booths and lower admission fees for the public. They also wanted the association to forbid overseas operators brought in by tourism boards to conduct sales, and called for greater transparency as well as the setting up of a travel fair organising committee comprising the outbound agencies.
Travel agencies on Tuesday (Nov 25) blasted at the National Association of Travel Agents Singapore (NATAS) for its lack of transparency over the usage of proceeds from its mega travel fairs and, among other things, its refusal to open the books, at a press conference attended by representatives of 24 tour agencies.
The agencies also said that the association was exploiting its members by not reducing rental rates for the NATAS fair.  A travel agency would need to pay between S$100,000 and S$200,000 to participate in the fair despite declining sales over the years that they attributed partly to the poor publicity for the twice-yearly event.
However, the group of 24 travel agencies said that they would be happy to discuss with the association on participating in the NATAS fair again if it addresses their concerns.
Mr Anthony Chan, group managing director of Chan Brothers Travel, said: “We are all very busy … we don’t want to spend effort organising travel fairs.”
Responding to complaints of the travel agencies which are pulling out of the travel fair, a NATAS spokesman said that although the cost of renting exhibition halls has steadily risen over the past three years, the association which has been holding its travel fairs at Singapore Expo, has not passed on the increases to the exhibitors.
He said NATAS has been in discussion with members and exhibitors about their grievances. “But we have to accept that NATAS may be unable to satisfy all its members given the diversity of our membership … Everyone may have a different opinion on how the fair ought to be run,” he said, adding that NATAS members include travel agents, tourism organisations, cruise lines and accommodation providers.
They said their dissatisfaction began in 2010. Despite raising the issues repeatedly, NATAS turned a deaf ear. They also submitted a petition last month, but the requests were not met, which was the last straw, they said.
They added that with customers increasingly making bookings via the Internet, holding a fair that charges an admission fee would further deter prospective customers.
Former NATAS group chief executive Robert Khoo, who stepped down last year, dismissed the agencies’ claims. “Customers are (getting fewer) simply because … everybody is doing their own fair. So they have already stolen a big chunk of the business before the NATAS fair even starts,” he said.
Mr Khoo said the admission fee – raised from S$3 in 2010 – was in place for crowd control and the members of the travel association had “fully supported (the) rationale” when NATAS explained it to them many years ago. It is said that the income earned from the fair is ploughed back into events for members, who can attend them for free. These include NATAS’ annual dinner and dance, football and golf tournaments, and seminars.
The spokesman said NATAS has a membership base of more than 340 travel agents. After the pulling out of the 24 agencies, the association will revamp its fairs and try to draw in new exhibitors. NATAS will meet its members on Wednesday in view of the current situation.

Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

NDR 2021: Muslim nurses in public healthcare to be allowed to wear tudung at work from November onwards

Muslim nurses in Singapore’s public healthcare sector will be permitted to wear…

Single mother “begs for mercy” at Speakers’ Corner – Son allegedly killed by single mother?

By Leong Sze Hian In the morning of Wednesday, 12 June, I…

亚洲海域5月11起海上持械抢劫案 三起在新加坡海域!

亚洲海域于上月发生共11起海上持械抢劫案,其中三起则发生在新加坡海域。 对此,亚洲地区反海盗及武装劫船合作协定信息共享中心(ReCAAP ISC)表示,将会对频繁出现海上抢劫案表示关注。 今年,从1月直至5月期间,亚洲海域持械抢劫案共出现了49起海上持械抢劫案。 新加坡海域近年来频繁出现海上持械抢劫案,今年5个月以来共发生将近15起,比起去年同期的七起更是激增一倍,亦创下了四年来新高。

绿色和平组织轰印尼政府执法不力 导致林火问题延续

印尼森林山火危机仍在持续,甚至严重影响当地生态与各国,印尼绿色和平组织(Greenpeace Indonesia)抨击,尽管事态严重,但自2015年至2018年,10家涉及焚烧大片森林的油棕公司并未受到行政或民事制裁。 此外,印尼政府也不曾因森林山火而吊销任何公司的油棕种植许可证。 “自2015年起,印尼政府本就应将遏制森林火灾再度发生作为首要工作,但实际上的结果显示,他们在打击这些企业上,只有空泛的承诺与出尔反尔的执法行动,所以吁请总统佐科威,马上撤销所有制造火灾的公司的许可证”,印度尼西亚绿色和平组织森林倡议人员陶菲克(Kiki Taufik)说。 绿色和平组织根据官方记录进行分析,发现在2015至2018年期间,逾340万公顷的土地被烧毁。 政府声称要应对火灾的同时还要兼顾执法,实属困难,但显然分析结果明显与政府所说有所差距。目前烟霾已经在过去两周内影响了邻国。 “为何造成严重火灾的10家企业,没有一家受到总统佐科威的严惩?为什么要豁免这些造成严重灾害的公司?很不幸的是,是因为政府并不重视执法,这也是为什么火灾会再度燃烧起来”, 陶菲克表示。 另外,绿色和平组织早前也揭露,因非法采伐与造成森林火灾的公司,尽管被政府向民事法庭起诉后,却没有一家偿还过罚款,截至今日,其欠款总额已高达12亿美元。 印尼森林山火不仅仅是普通火灾,更是对无论是生态、健康还是经济都有着重大影响。世界银行曾估算,2015年的森林山火已造成印尼损失160亿美元,其中来自各方面如林业、农业、旅游业以及其他行业的亏损。另外,烟霾导致数十万人患上呼吸道与其他疾病,据悉,可能带来逾10万人过早死亡。 在生态方面,因烟霾制造了每日1130万吨碳排放量到大气层中,其数字甚过整个欧洲联盟的碳排放量。…