Confrontation
(Image by Lawrence Chong)
A heated dispute between a National Parks officer and organiser of the Central Provident Funds (CPF) protest event took place last afternoon at Hong Lim Park over the shared use of the speakers’ corner.
Confrontation 
When Chia Seng Jiang, National Parks’s director of the Parks division approached Han Hui Hui, the organiser of the CPF Protest just about 30 minutes before the start of her event. Ms Han was taken back by his request as he had requested that she shift her event to another part of Hong Lim Park beside the park’s toilet. He explained to her that the location is the allocated space for her event by National Parks as there is already another event taking place at Hong Lim Par. However, Ms Han refused to budge and rebuked that there was no such demarcation for her event when she applied for the permit.
When Mr Chia failed to get Ms Han to cooperate, he gathered a group of people (who were introduced as plain clothes police officers) and approached her as seen in the video below.

[youtube id=”FYbINIUjzpU” align=”center” mode=”normal”]

Ms Han asked for identification from Mr Chia and the group of supposed plain clothes police officer, Mr Chia presented his name-card from National Parks while one representative of the plainclothes police officers presented a pass which had the person’s face and insignia of the Singapore Police Force (SPF) on it.
The confrontation between National Parks and Police ended after the police made their point that there has been no police permit granted for the procession within Hong Lim Park and they would have to seek National Parks’s permission. Mr Chia also said that Ms Han’s speaker permit will be cancelled by the Commissioner of Parks and Recreation as required by the Speaker’s corner regulation. However in the end, no instructions came from the commissioner for her permit to be revoked.
Ms Han explained to the media that she could not shift the protest site as the sound system has already been set up and they require the earth mound in Hong Lim Park to stand on as they did not cater for any stage this time round.
Ms Han claims that she only got to know of the YMCA’s event on Thursday evening when she went to survey the venue, where she was confronted by four grassroots members from the community centre saying that they would ferry 5000 supporters to Hong Lim Park to disrupt the protest event. (Ms Han’s facebook post)
 
An unforeseen crossing of events
The other event that was held at Hong Lim Park on the same day is Young Men’s Christian Association (YMCA)’s Prom 2014. The event is a charity event which seeks to develop corporate social responsibility for companies by mobilising their staff to volunteer for a day in serving the less privileged through the programme.
YMCA clarified that it is a voluntary welfare organisation and is the organiser of YMCA Proms @ the Park. The activity has been organised annually since 2007 and they do not represent any grassroots organisation.
They added that YMCA had applied to National Parks for permission to use Hong Lim Park in December 2013 and were given permission in April 2014 to hold the event on 27th September 2014.
Although YMCA clarified in their statement that neither YMCA nor its representatives have had communication with Ms Han but an audio recording which is available online shows that Ms Han made contact with Mr Samuel Chan from YMCA. This implies that prior communication was made between the two organizers.
TOC spoke to some of the volunteers of the YMCA’s event and they said that they were not informed that there was another event taking place in the park.
 
Disturbance caused by the clash of events
The organisers of the CPF Protest event started off by recounting what had just happened and claimed that the timing for the YMCA event was purposely changed so as to clash with the protest event.
This ruffled up negative sentiments of crowd towards the YMCA event. After each speech is made about CPF issues and the policy failure of the ruling party, the People’s Action Party, the protest group went for a round of procession around the Hong Lim Park and around the tentage set up by YMCA.
[youtube id=”mhh1Hs7u9bY” align=”center” mode=”normal”] Ms Han said to the media that the reason why they went all the way into area of YMCA, was because there were attempts to push them out of the venue.
Quite a number of volunteers from YMCA and supposedly grassroots leaders were seen to be uncomfortable with the slogans and unexpected crowd at their event.
Crowd also spilled into the tentage of YMCA to seek shelter from the sun.
Some of the special needs students were affected by the competition of volume between the audio speakers from both events, as they are seen trying to cover their ears from the loud noises. However most of the audience did not seem to be affected by the large crowd gathered.
[youtube id=”2CHc2bLbtxg” align=”center” mode=”normal”]  
Minister of State who held his composure
Minister of State for the Ministry of Trade and Industry, Teo Ser Luck was invited as the Guest of Honor to YMCA’s event. The minister was immediately targeted by the protest group with their constant chants of “Return Our CPF” while he officially launched the event and greeted the members of public who turned up for the YMCA Prom 2014.
Despite the constant “bombardment” of slogans targeted at Mr Teo, the minister did not seem disturbed and kept his composure as he sat through the performances by the students. Subsequently Mr Teo got into direct contact with the protest group as they made their way near the stage area during one of their procession.
Mr Teo showed no signs of distress as he shook the hands of individuals in the protest group to greet them as they passed by him. It was instead the organisers of the YMCA event who were shaken by the close encounter, prompting ushers to surround Mr Teo as the protest group tries to shake Mr Teo’s hand.
[youtube id=”sm1BRlgJKOo” align=”center” mode=”normal”]  
“Heckling” of special needs children
A youtube video on the protest event has been spreading about the protesters heckling the performance by the special needs children at the YMCA’s event. Various members of the parliament and members of the public have condemned the insensitive actions by the protesters.
However, the video taken by TOC shows that the protest group was marching around in the park before stopping in front of the stage. At this moment in time as seen in the video, the children were nowhere to be seen. A few seconds later, the emcee announced the performance by the group of children and that is when the protest group carried on their procession back to their protest area.
[youtube id=”6HKpNvzt33c” align=”center” mode=”normal”]  
Response by Singapore Police Force and the National Parks Board

“Speaker’s Corner in Hong Lim Park is designated by the Government as an area for public speaking and demonstrations. Application to use the park was first received from YMCA and approval to use the park was given to YMCA on Sep 9. Ms Han’s application was received on Sep 22 and approval was granted to Ms Han on the same day.
In anticipation of the crowd this afternoon, NParks demarcated and allocated space for both events. There are two lawns at Hong Lim Park, and each event was allocated a lawn. NParks and SPF approached Ms Han to request her cooperation to speak at the allocated space.
We regret to note that Ms Han did not heed our advice and continued to hold her event at the same lawn as YMCA. Ms Han’s group encroached into the YMCA event area, holding placards and shouting slogans, disrupted performances and frightened participants, including special needs children who were performing at the charity event. The Police will be conducting investigations into this incident.”

Voices of the protest supporters
At the peak of the protest event, over 700 individuals of different age groups turned up for the protest event while YMCA had said that about 900 individuals from public volunteers, corporate volunteers from 14 organisations, and beneficiaries from 17 VWOs were invited for their event.
Mr Chan, an odd job worker who was at the protest event, said that he was formerly an engineer but was retrenched from his job. He could not find any engineering job which he attributes to the influx of foreigners in the engineering section and added that his wife is also currently unemployed.
A Chinese male in his fifties who was with his aged mother said that they were there to give moral support to the event. They both do not have CPF but still wanted to turn up for the event to give moral support to the event.
Another Chinese male in his fifties said that his CPF money of about 100 thousand is stuck inside his CPF account and two of his children will be going to university soon, he asked how is he going to get the money to pay for their school fees. He added, “what use is it if people do not see their wages increase despite the yearly increase in economy growth?”
Madam Tan said that she was there to hear what the speakers had to say. She added that Singaporeans are educated enough to try to find their own answers on issues such as CPF.
A Malay uncle said that he was there because of the newspaper reporting of the YMCA clarification about the event and wanted to hear what the speakers had to say. On the CPF issue, he said that he agrees with the government’s stance of implementing minimum sum as people have to take personal responsibility on retirement however noted that the CPF system can be further improved for the low-income families.
Ms Han has announced that another protest will be carried out in Hong Lim Park on 25th October 2014.

Subscribe
Notify of
75 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Tan Cheng Bock: I refuse to compromise

by: Jewel Philemon/ Jovial, open and down to earth. These are the…

Ho Kwon Ping says that PAP will not suffer same fate as UMNO, but academics think otherwise

Speaking at an OCBC Forum entitled Singapore Politics and Business in an Age of Disruption (12…

分享讽刺视频 网民接资媒局警告信要求撤下

日前,警方和资讯通信媒体发展局(IMDA)发出联合声明,基于网红普丽蒂(Preetipls)的视频被指含侮辱内容,接受警方调查,而呼吁民众不要重新上载或分享有关视频。 本周一,本地Youtube网红“美丽求求你”普丽蒂(Preeti Nair,简称Preetipls),相信是不满电子付费平台epay拍摄的广告宣传照欠缺敏感度,也拍摄讽刺视频回应。 但有关视频在当天中午就被令撤下,警方稍后发文告指有人就普丽蒂上载的视频报案,视频被指含有侮辱性内容。 虽然原视频已遭撤下,但不久后仍有不少网民在脸书和youtube等平台重新上载,遭其他网民疯传。对此警方在前日发文呼吁民众停止在网络散播普丽蒂的视频。 事实上确实有网民,只因为分享视频结果接到资媒局的警告信,要求在六小时内把分享链接和贴文删除。其中社运分子范国瀚也中招。 范国瀚在脸书无奈写道:“我收到要求撤下普丽蒂视频的通知,根据资媒局,如果任由视频散播,会造成族群仇视和纠纷。”他也挖苦道,视频只能留在脸书六个小时,所以还没看的宜从速。 至于另一网民也把资媒局的信函分享在个人脸书,但他认为对于国人族群问题不应被扫在地毯下,大家更应该继续帮助少数族群维护权益。 网红“美丽求求你”拍摄的讽刺视频,亦引起许多争议。有部分网民认为政府有“双重标准”的嫌疑。针对新传媒的争议广告,只需要致歉,然而对网红兄妹的惩罚反而“严正以待”,甚至出动警方调查。  

国大老龄中心研究:近半受访年长者 财务收入仅“刚好应付”开支

根据杜克-新加坡国大老龄中心(CARE)近期发布的一份研究,研究中有近半(49巴仙)受访年长者认为,虽生活上未有困难,但财务收入只能刚好应付生活开支。 杜克新加坡国立大学医学院,老龄研究与教育中心发布《新加坡健康、就业、社交和代际转移研究》报告,研究获得卫生部支持,采访了4千549名,60岁以上的年长新加坡人。 上述研究涵括国内年长群体在身心灵健康、对于医疗保健服务使用程度、社交、社会参与感、代际(财富)转移、终身学习、就业和退休等各方面。 研究其中一项课题,询问年长受访者,他们是否有足够的收入来应付每月家庭开支。 在2017年,有29.5巴仙的60岁以上受访成年人认为,他们有足够的钱应付开支,还有些盈余,但随着年龄增长这个比例减少,例如80岁以上,认为财务够用的受访者仅为25巴仙。 至于近半年长者则反映他们的收入财务只是刚好够用,生活上未有困难。 至于在应付开支上面对一些困难的受访者比例为14.6巴仙,比起2009年13.9巴仙有所增加。至于面对许多困难者,从2009年的2.4巴仙,在2017年增至3.8巴仙。 不过,研究中未衡量受访者的消费和支出。 生活成本、医疗开支增加 研究者认为,年长者面对财务不足,可能来自包括生活成本以及对医疗开支的增长等因素,特别是80岁以上群体面对的财务不足比例最高。 至于在70-79岁年龄层,生活开支上面对一些和许多困难者高达21巴仙。 报告也揭示随着教育程度提升,收入充足程度也增加。他们在家庭外地社交圈子也较稳健。…