Connect with us

Uncategorized

Honour in Singapore Q&A – Religious issues

Published

on

As TOC’s “Honour in Singapore” series drew to a close, we sent a number of queries to Honour (Singapore)’s chairman Lim Siong Guan and executive director Jason Wong to clarify on some of the issues we raised. They declined a recorded interview, opting for an email response instead.
The following are their answers, which we have presented in two parts due to their length, according to the question type. All answers are attributable to Mr Lim Siong Guan unless otherwise stated. They have requested us to present their answers without comment, so that you may make your conclusions about them on your own.
———-
Question specifically for Mr Wong: As the executive director, how would you ensure that the ideals of Focus on the Family do not interfere with what Honour (Singapore) is doing? This is with the view that Focus on the Family, or yourself personally, is already active in MOE’s initiatives.
Response from Mr Wong: Most of my life and career has been spent working with prisoners and drug addicts (17 years in the Prisons Service), and with the at-risk children and youth of our nation (6 years in the Ministry of Social & Family Development). Having personally witnessed the downstream effects of broken families, I volunteered my time to help parents and families, such as speaking to parents in schools and sharing what I had seen firsthand.
I have worked in many organizations and sat on multiple boards and committees. When I serve a particular organization, I perform my function according to the organization’s mission, vision and objectives.
When I wear the hat of Chairman of Focus, my goal is to “Help Families Thrive”. When I am invited by schools to speak to parents, I do so in alignment with their guidelines and values. As the Executive Director of Honour (Singapore), I seek the well-being of our nation by promoting a culture of honour and honouring in Singapore. I do not confuse my roles. Together, they represent the various passions of my personal journey. It is an honour to serve my nation.
One of your board members, Mr Khoo, have publicly made references to “prevailing over the gates” – a term also used in FGB Singapore’s literature – to describe Mr Magnus’s Public Transport Council appointment, to which Mr Magnus did not publicly object. Does this not indicate their intention to influence public policy using FGB values? How will Honour (Singapore) prevent such influence from happening at an organisational level?
All work in Honour (Singapore) must conform with its secular approach, and fit the multi-racial and multi-religious context of Singapore.
Singaporeans are so fortunate to have freedom of religion, where religious affiliation is treated as a personal and private matter. Singaporeans should work with each other for the well-being of the nation, irrespective of race or religion. It will be a sad day for us all if people are prevented from doing good because of their religious affiliations and beliefs. We should never discredit someone or cast aspersions on them because they are of a particular faith, whether they are a Buddhist, a Christian, a Muslim, or an atheist. If a person’s religious beliefs inspire him to do good and to care for other people and the country, it is a good thing. It is negative only if they desire to do
something that is detrimental to society.
Question specifically for Mr Lim: You have categorically denied that Honour (Singapore) has no connection with FGB Singapore. Given that all your board members are also senior members of FGB Singapore, what due processes do you have in place to keep the influence separate?
Response from Mr. Lim: All the board members of Honour (Singapore) have worked, or are working, in secular organisations. They are involved in multiple roles where every role has its specific responsibilities and limitations. They know the boundaries between secular activities and religious activities. We are sensitized and are sensitive to the multiracial and multi-religious nature of Singapore, and the absolute need to maintain social and religious harmony. We know that we have to reach out to all sections of Singapore society, and we cannot do this if we carry out our object with a religious thrust.
Given the current situation of religious influence in secular Singapore – for instance, the NLB “Penguingate” incident – why did the Honour (Singapore) board not see the need to be upfront about their FGB affiliations, and instead only chose to respond when the relationships were highlighted by online media?
If we had wanted to hide, we would not have listed all our board members on our website. All of them have established track records and are well-known in their respective fields. There is no way to hide what other endeavours or causes they are committed to. We should hope that their religious beliefs, which in Singapore is regarded as a personal and private matter for each Singaporean to decide for himself or herself, would not be a disqualifier for them to participate in secular activity or to do good for the society and country. Mercy Relief, for example, started as a Muslim initiative that has done Singapore proud. When the board members of Honour (Singapore) take on multiple roles, they need to be clear what each role is, and maintain focus and clarity on the role in their words and actions.
———-

Top image – Honour (Singapore) website.

The “Honour in Singapore” series includes:

Like this article? Support us so that we can do more. Subscribe to TOC here.

Continue Reading
3 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Indonesia

Miss Universe cuts ties with Indonesia chapter after harassment allegations

The Miss Universe Organization severs ties with Indonesia franchise due to harassment claims. Malaysia edition canceled.

Women allege body checks before pageant. Investigation launched. Safety prioritized.

Indonesia winner to compete in November finale. Height requirement controversy.

Published

on

WASHINGTON, UNITED STATES — The Miss Universe Organization has cut ties with its Indonesia franchise, it announced days after allegations of sexual harassment, and will cancel an upcoming Malaysia edition.

In the complaint, more than a half dozen women said all 30 finalists for Miss Universe Indonesia were unexpectedly asked to strip for a supposed body check for scars and cellulite two days before the pageant’s crowning ceremony in Jakarta.

Their lawyer said Tuesday that five of the women had their pictures taken.

“In light of what we have learned took place at Miss Universe Indonesia, it has become clear that this franchise has not lived up to our brand standards, ethics, or expectations,” the US-based Miss Universe Organization posted Saturday night on social media site X, formerly known as Twitter.

It said that it had “decided to terminate the relationship with its current franchise in Indonesia, PT Capella Swastika Karya, and its National Director, Poppy Capella.”

It thanked the contestants for their bravery in coming forward and added that “providing a safe place for women” was the organization’s priority.

Jakarta police spokesman Trunoyudo Wisnu Andiko said Tuesday that an investigation into the women’s complaint has been launched.

The Indonesia franchise also holds the license for Miss Universe Malaysia, where there will no longer be a competition this year, according to the New York-based parent organizer.

In a lengthy statement posted to Instagram, Indonesia franchise director Capella denied involvement in any body checks.

“I, as the National Director and as the owner of the Miss Universe Indonesia license, was not involved at all and have never known, ordered, requested or allowed anyone who played a role and participated in the process of organizing Miss Universe Indonesia 2023 to commit violence or sexual harassment through body checking,” she wrote.

She added that she is against “any form of violence or sexual harassment.”

The Jakarta competition was held from 29 July to 3 August to choose Indonesia’s representative to the 2023 Miss Universe contest, and was won by Fabienne Nicole Groeneveld.

Miss Universe said it would make arrangements for her to compete in the finale, scheduled for November in El Salvador.

This year’s Indonesia pageant also came under fire for announcing a “significant change in this (year’s) competition guidelines” with the elimination of its minimum height requirement after it had crowned a winner.

In its statement, the Miss Universe Organization said it wanted to “make it extremely clear that there are no measurements such as height, weight, or body dimensions required to join a Miss Universe pageant worldwide.”

— AFP

Continue Reading

Malaysia

A Perodua service centre in Kuantan, Malaysia went viral for its strict dress code, Perodua responds

A dress code for vehicle servicing? A Malaysian car brand’s service centre dress code signage has puzzled netizens, raising queries about the need for attire rules during a routine service.

The manufacturer responded with an official statement after a flurry of comments, seeking to clarify and apologize.

Published

on

By

MALAYSIA: A dress code signage positioned at a service centre belonging to a prominent Malaysian car brand has sparked bewilderment among Malaysian netizens, who question the necessity of adhering to attire guidelines for a simple vehicle servicing.

The signage explicitly delineates clothing items that are deemed unsuitable, including sleeveless tops, short skirts, abbreviated pants, and distressed jeans.

The car manufacturer swiftly found itself flooded with comments from both inquisitive and irked Malaysian netizens. This surge in online activity prompted the company to issue an official statement aimed at clarifying the situation and extending an apology.

In a post that gained significant traction on the social media platform, politician Quek Tai Seong of Pahang State, Malaysia, shared an image to Facebook on Monday (7 Aug).

The image showcased a dress code sign prominently displayed at a Perodua Service Centre in Kuantan. Within the post, Quek posed the question: “Is this dress code applicable nationwide, or is it specific to this branch?”

The signage reads, “All customers dealing with Perodua Service Kuantan 1, Semambu, are requested to dress modestly and appropriately.”

Adding visual clarity to these guidelines, the sign features illustrative graphics that explicitly outline clothing items deemed unacceptable, including sleeveless tops, short skirts, short pants, and ripped jeans.

Delineating the specifics of the dress code, the signage stipulates that male visitors are expected to don shirts accompanied by neckties, opt for long pants, and wear closed shoes.

Conversely, female visitors are advised to don long-sleeved shirts, full-length skirts, and closed-toe footwear.

Perodua’s dress code sparks online uproar

Following the rapid spread of the post, Perodua’s official Facebook page found itself inundated with comments from both intrigued and frustrated Malaysian netizens, all seeking clarifications about the newly surfaced dress code policy.

Amidst the flurry of comments, numerous incensed netizens posed pointed questions such as, “What is the rationale behind the introduction of such regulations by the management? We demand an explanation.”

Another netizen expressed their dissatisfaction, arguing against the necessity of the rule and urging Perodua to take inspiration from the practices of other 4S (Sales, Service, Spare Parts, and Survey) automotive dealerships.

A concerned Facebook user chimed in, advocating for a more lenient stance, asserting that attempting to dictate customers’ clothing choices might not be in the company’s best interest.

Someone also commented in an angry tone, “Oi what is this? Going there for car service, not interview or working, right.”

As the discourse unfolded, it became evident that while some inquiries carried genuine weight, others chose to inject humor into the situation, playfully remarking, “If I wanted to buy a Myvi, I should buy or rent a formal attire first.”

“I sell economy rice at a hawker centre, I have never worn a long sleeve shirt and a tie… I guess I will not buy a Perodua car then.”

“I guess they will not serve those who wear short pants.”

Perodua addresses dress code controversy

As reported by Chinese media outlet Sin Chew Daily News, the manager of Kuantan’s Perodua Service Centre had acknowledged that the images on the dress code signage were misleading.

In response, the manager divulged that discussions had transpired with the head office, leading to the prompt removal of the signage to prevent any further misconceptions.

The manager clarifies, “We do encourage visitors to adhere to the dress etiquette, but we won’t go to the extent of restricting their choice of attire.”

He also revealed that currently, no complaints have been directly received from the public.

However, feedback from certain customers was relayed through Perodua’s agents.

Perodua also released an official statement by chief operating officer JK Rozman Jaffar on Wednesday (9 Aug) regarding the dress code on their official Facebook page.

The statement stated the dress code etiquette is not aligned with their official guidelines and they are currently conducting an official investigation on the matter followed by corrective measures to avoid the same incident from happening.

Perodua also extends its apologies for any inconvenience caused.

 

Continue Reading

Trending