Current Affairs
NTUC Income aims to redefine how insurance is transacted in Singapore
PRESS RELEASE.
NTUC Income declares ambition to make insurance simple, honest and different for customers
Insurer aims to set new industry standards and redefine how insurance is bought and sold
"Every person has a right to information that can be understood after a single reading, and every institution has the responsibility to communicate clearly. NTUC Income has achieved more Crystal Marks than any other business in Asia. This is a truly commendable effort from them to be clear and fair to their customers."
Chrissie Maher OBE, founder of Plain English Campaign
Singapore, 3 October 2012 – NTUC Income, Singapore’s leading insurer, announced that it is taking further steps in its commitment to honest insurance and putting the interests of its customers first.
In its latest move, NTUC Income has overhauled its contracts into plain English to make it easier for customers to understand its insurance policies and enable them to make informed decisions. This confronts the long-standing problem of customers not understanding insurance plans and sometimes buying a plan that is not right for them. This initiative stems from the insurer’s “Honest Insurance” philosophy and its continual endeavour to identify and solve pains and unfairness felt by customers.
NTUC Income is the first insurance company in Asia to undertake a major Crystal Mark initiative. Crystal Mark is a globally-recognised standard for plain English, used by many leading institutions in the UK, the US and Australia. It is a seal of approval guaranteeing a document is written in plain English and offers simple, clear and concise information. It is given by a British-based body, the Plain English Campaign, set up in 1979 to advocate the use of plain English in business.
The Plain English Campaign says that NTUC Income has the highest number of Crystal Marks of any business in Asia. NTUC Income has over 50 Crystal Marks and over 95% of NTUC Income’s customers will now have their contracts issued with Crystal Marks.
At the same time, NTUC Income is reinforcing its commitment to being upfront and transparent through a brand campaign that depicts how the use of jargon, overcomplicated phrases and terms and conditions can put a customer at a disadvantage. NTUC Income is committed to solving these pains and making insurance simple, honest and different. The campaign uses the * (asterisk) to symbolise insurer’s practices that cause customer pains.
This commitment is consistent with the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s Guidelines for Fair Dealing which seek to ensure that “customers receive clear, relevant and timely information to make informed financial decisions”.
Mr Tan Suee Chieh, Chief Executive, NTUC Income said, “We are making our contracts as clear and as fair as possible, to demystify insurance and to give customers a fair deal. We will not hide behind legal technicalities and use them as excuses not to pay claims. Instead, we will always honour the intentions of our contract."
Mr Tan added, “NTUC Income will continue to take new and bold steps to set new insurance standards, eliminate customer pains and set a new agenda to make insurance simple, honest, different.”
Commenting on NTUC Income’s move, Mr Seah Seng Choon, Executive Director of the Consumers Association of Singapore, which champions consumer rights, said, “NTUC Income has taken the lead to revise its insurance contracts into simple English. Such a move can only benefit consumers, who are now more likely to read and understand what they are buying in. The launch of the plain English contracts, which is a massive undertaking that requires significant investment and effort, reflects NTUC Income’s customer-centricity.”
He added, “I am certain NTUC Income will benefit from customer loyalty in the long run. I urge more insurers and financial institutions to follow suit in making their contracts simpler and more reader-friendly. In so doing, they will demonstrate that they are taking care of their customers’ interests.”
Honest Insurance
Through applying its Honest Insurance philosophy, NTUC Income aims to change the insurance industry agenda and to take the lead in redefining how insurance policies are bought and sold.
In October 2011, NTUC Income launched Orange First, an initiative to drive the importance of fair dealing and trustworthiness into the foreground of its agents’ awareness.
In the area of transparency, NTUC Income has been the only insurer in Singapore to publish the yields of its life policies for the sixth year running.
In settling claims fairly, NTUC Income is committed to interpreting a contract according to its intention and not on the basis of legal technicalities.
Earlier this year, for example, NTUC Income made an exceptional payout under its Student Protection Plan (SPP) to the family of Lee Yu Heng, the Primary 4 student who died in a traffic accident outside his school in Sembawang. At the time of the accident, NTUC Income had not finalized the SPP contract with Yu Heng’s school. But there was evidence that NTUC Income was going to be selected and premiums would have been effective prior to the accident.
Legally, NTUC Income was not liable to pay because the contract had not been signed. However, it chose to honour the intent of the contract.
Back in 2010, the volcanic eruption in Iceland caused significant disruption to travels to and from Europe. Many travel insurance policyholders made claims for cancelled trips and flight delays. Going by the strict definition of policy terms and conditions, Iceland would have had to be the final planned destination for such claims to be admissible. But NTUC Income chose to honour the intent of the policy and processed more than 400 claims, and paid out an estimated $400,000.
Step change transformation through Orange Revolution
The Plain English project comes under the banner of Orange Speak, an initiative that is part of NTUC Income’s Orange Revolution. Mr Tan declared the Orange Revolution to over a thousand employees, agents and partners at a townhall meeting in October 2011. The objective of Orange Revolution is to set new insurance industry standards and redefine how insurance is bought and sold. It is supported by the pillars of Value and Honest Insurance and the underlying pursuit of Excellence.
Through the Orange Revolution, NTUC Income is doing things differently. The maiden initiative of this is the introduction of its Orange Force, NTUC Income’s fleet of motorcyclists who ride to the assistance of policyholders when they have a motor accident. The arrival of this elite force of 30 riders and their bright orange motorbikes on Singapore highways has helped reinforce NTUC Income’s status as the top motor insurer in Singapore, insuring one in four cars and one in two motorcycles. Orange Force is approaching its first anniversary. In its first year of operations, the force has made nearly 10,000 engagements and received over 300 written compliments from customers expressing their gratitude.
Said Mr Tan, “We are committed to doing things differently and to making insurance simple, honest and different. Throughout our transformation, NTUC Income will stay true to its social purpose of making insurance affordable, accessible and sustainable to all.”
About Plain English Campaign and Crystal Mark
Established in 1979, Plain English Campaign is a strong advocate of the use of plain English, encouraging organisations to communicate with the public clearly in plain language.
In 1990, Plain English Campaign introduced the Crystal Mark. The Crystal Mark is the organisation’s seal of approval for the clarity of a document. It has become firmly established as the standard that organisations aim for if they want to provide the clearest possible information to the public. The Crystal Mark now appears on more than 21,000 documents.
The Cabinet Office, GlaxoSmithKine, Abbeyfield UK and NatWest Bank are among organisations in the UK that have Crystal Marks.
About NTUC Income
NTUC Income was established in 1970 to provide affordable insurance for workers in Singapore. As a social enterprise, NTUC Income was made different from the start, with a mission to provide value for customers above maximising profits for shareholders.
NTUC Income is today a market leader in life, health, annuity and motor insurance and is committed to serving the needs of over two million customers. It has over $27 billion of assets under management.
NTUC Income’s corporate social responsibility focusses on equalising opportunities for children and youth from disadvantaged backgrounds.
Microsoft Word – 20121003 – Comparison – NTUC Income's Crystal Mark Contracts Vs Industry
Current Affairs
Reforming Singapore’s defamation laws: Preventing legal weapons against free speech
Opinion: The tragic suicide of Geno Ong, linked to the financial stress from a defamation lawsuit, raises a critical issue: Singapore’s defamation laws need reform. These laws must not be weaponized to silence individuals.
by Alexandar Chia
This week, we hear the tragic story of the suicide of Geno Ong, with Ong citing the financial stress from the defamation lawsuit against her by Raymond Ng and Iris Koh.
Regardless of who’s right and who’s wrong, this Koh/Ng vs Ong affair raises a wider question at play – the issue of Singapore’s defamation laws and how it needs to be tightened.
Why is this needed? This is because defamation suits cannot be weaponised the way they have been in Singapore law. It cannot be used to threaten people into “shutting up”.
Article 14(2)(a) of the Constitution may permit laws to be passed to restrict free speech in the area of defamation, but it does not remove the fact that Article 14(1)(a) is still law, and it permits freedom of speech.
As such, although Article 14(2)(a) allows restrictions to be placed on freedom of speech with regard to the issue of defamation, it must not be to the extent where Article 14(1)(a)’s rights and liberties are not curtailed completely or heavily infringed on.
Sadly, that is the case with regard to precedence in defamation suits.
Let’s have a look at the defamation suit then-PM Goh Chok Tong filed against Dr Chee Soon Juan after GE 2001 for questions Dr Chee asked publicly about a $17 billion loan made to Suharto.
If we look at point 12 of the above link, in the “lawyer’s letter” sent to Dr Chee, Goh’s case of himself being defamed centred on lines Dr Chee used in his question, such as “you can run but you can’t hide”, and “did he not tell you about the $17 billion loan”?
In the West, such lines of questioning are easily understood at worse as hyperbolically figurative expressions with the gist of the meaning behind such questioning on why the loan to Suharto was made.
Unfortunately, Singapore’s defamation laws saw Dr Chee’s actions of imputing ill motives on Goh, when in the West, it is expected of incumbents to take the kind of questions Dr Chee asked, and such questions asked of incumbent office holders are not uncommon.
And the law permits pretty flimsy reasons such as “withdrawal of allegations” to be used as a deciding factor if a statement is defamatory or not – this is as per points 66-69 of the judgement.
This is not to imply or impute ill intent on Singapore courts. Rather, it shows how defamation laws in Singapore needs to be tightened, to ensure that a possible future scenario where it is weaponised as a “shut-up tool”, occurs.
These are how I suggest it is to be done –
- The law has to make mandatory, that for a case to go into a full lawsuit, there has to be a 3-round exchange of talking points and two attempts at legal mediation.
- Summary judgment should be banned from defamation suits, unless if one party fails to adduce evidence or a defence.
- A statement is to be proven false, hence, defamatory, if there is strictly material along with circumstantial evidence showing that the statement is false. Apologies and related should not be used as main determinants, given how many of these statements are made in the heat of the moment, from the natural feelings of threat and intimidation from a defamation suit.
- A question should only be considered defamatory if it has been repeated, after material facts of evidence are produced showing, beyond reasonable doubt, that the message behind the question, is “not so”, and if there is a directly mentioned subject in the question. For example, if an Opposition MP, Mr A, was found to be poisoned with a banned substance, and I ask openly on how Mr A got access to that substance, given that its banned, I can’t be found to have “defamed the government” with the question as 1) the government was not mentioned directly and 2) if the government has not produced material evidence that they indeed had no role in the poisoning affair, if they were directly mentioned.
- Damages should be tiered, with these tiers coded into the Defamation Act – the highest quantum of damages (i.e. those of a six-figured nature) is only to be reserved if the subject of defamation lost any form of office, revenue or position, or directly quantifiable public standing, or was subjected to criminal action, because of the act of defamation. If none of such occur, the maximum amount of damages a plaintiff in a defamation can claim is a 4-figure amount capped at $2000. This will prevent rich and powerful figures from using defamation suits and 6-figure damages to intimidate their questioners and detractors.
- All defendants of defamation suit should be allowed full access to legal aid schemes.
Again, this piece does not suggest bad-faith malpractice by the courts in Singapore. Rather, it is to suggest how to tighten up defamation laws to avoid it being used as the silencing hatchet.
Current Affairs
Man arrested for alleged housebreaking and theft of mobile phones in Yishun
A 23-year-old man was arrested for allegedly breaking into a Yishun Ring Road rental flat and stealing eight mobile phones worth S$3,400 from five tenants. The Singapore Police responded swiftly on 1 September, identifying and apprehending the suspect on the same day. The man has been charged with housebreaking, which carries a potential 10-year jail term.
SINGAPORE: A 23-year-old man has been arrested for allegedly breaking into a rental flat along Yishun Ring Road and stealing eight mobile phones from five tenants.
The incident occurred in the early hours on Sunday (1 September), according to a statement from the Singapore Police Force.
The authorities reported that they received a call for assistance at around 5 a.m. on that day.
Officers from the Woodlands Police Division quickly responded and, through ground enquiries and police camera footage, were able to identify and apprehend the suspect on the same day.
The stolen mobile phones, with an estimated total value of approximately S$3,400, were recovered hidden under a nearby bin.
The suspect was charged in court on Monday with housebreaking with the intent to commit theft.
If convicted, he could face a jail term of up to 10 years and a fine.
In light of this incident, the police have advised property owners to take precautions to prevent similar crimes.
They recommend securing all doors, windows, and other openings with good quality grilles and padlocks when leaving premises unattended, even for short periods.
The installation of burglar alarms, motion sensor lights, and CCTV cameras to cover access points is also advised. Additionally, residents are urged to avoid keeping large sums of cash and valuables in their homes.
The investigation is ongoing.
Last month, police disclosed that a recent uptick in housebreaking incidents in private residential estates across Singapore has been traced to foreign syndicates, primarily involving Chinese nationals.
Preliminary investigations indicate that these syndicates operate in small groups, targeting homes by scaling perimeter walls or fences.
The suspects are believed to be transient travelers who enter Singapore on Social Visit Passes, typically just a day or two before committing the crimes.
Before this recent surge in break-ins, housebreaking cases were on the decline, with 59 reported in the first half of this year compared to 70 during the same period last year.
However, between 1 June and 4 August 2024, there were 10 reported housebreaking incidents, predominantly in private estates around the Rail Corridor and Bukit Timah Road.
The SPF has intensified efforts to engage residents near high-risk areas by distributing crime prevention advisories, erecting alert signs, and training them to patrol their neighborhoods, leading to an increase in reports of suspicious activity.
-
Singapore7 days ago
Minister K Shanmugam transfers Astrid Hill GCB to UBS Trustees for S$88 Million following Ridout Road controversy
-
Politics4 days ago
Dr Tan Cheng Bock questions S$335 million Founders’ Memorial cost, citing Lee Kuan Yew’s stance
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Singapore woman’s suicide amidst legal battle raises concerns over legal system
-
Parliament1 week ago
Minister Shanmugam rejects request for detailed information on visa-free visitor offences: Cites bilateral considerations
-
Diplomacy2 weeks ago
India PM Narendra Modi meets with PM Lawrence Wong; Four MoUs signed
-
Parliament1 week ago
PAP MPs attack WP Gerald Giam in Parliament over NTUC independence from ruling party
-
Politics2 weeks ago
PAP adopts SDP policies after criticizing them: Dr Chee urges Singaporeans to see through tactics
-
Politics2 days ago
Lee Hsien Loong warns of limited political space if election margins narrow