~ By Wong Wee Nam ~

Recently 44 (and more) people were charged in court with having sex with an under-aged girl. One was allowed to go overseas to do his business and another was allowed to leave the country to get married. Indeed this show of sympathy by our judiciary is something to be applauded.

Yet I cannot understand why our country cannot be equally generous with their sympathy for people who are deemed to be “political”.

Dr Ang Swee Chai is an orthopaedic surgeon who was arrested under the ISA on 15th of March 1977. She was not charged for anything and was later released to join her husband of two weeks, Francis Khoo, a lawyer who had escaped to and exiled in London.

During the years in London, Dr Ang became internationally well-known for her humanitarian work in Palestinian refugee camps. She also founded “Medical Aid for Palestinians”, a charity established in the wake of the 1982 Sabra Shatila massacre in Lebanon. This is a Singapore lady who has done Singapore proud. Not many Singaporeans have achieved such honour. If she had been a British citizen, she would probably have received an award on Her Majesty’s birthday.

She has spoken extensively in the UK, including the British Parliament, and in Europe, and yet she was not allowed to come back to her country, not even for her parent’s funeral some years back. It was only in February this year that she was finally given permission to bring the ashes of her late husband back home.

Dr Ang has given countless of interviews overseas, including the British Broadcasting Corporation, and yet when she was here in Singapore none of the local media was interested in her.

When I had the privilege of meeting her, I tried to ascertain her feelings for her country and the home she had yearned for 35 years to return to. I asked her if Singapore should ever fall into a situation like Palestine, would she come back with the same fervour to do the same humanitarian work. She replied in no uncertain terms that she would. In fact, she and her husband had often discussed fondly the Singapore that had been left behind. She recalled once when she took a beautiful picture of a Lebanon beach and showed it to Francis, her husband replied that our Changi Beach was more beautiful than that.

Yet in spite of being honoured for her humanitarian work and as an orthopaedic surgeon who could contribute a lot to Singapore, she is still not free to come in as and when she likes. In February this year, she was only given a single-entry permit to bring her husband’s ashes back. This means that she still needs to apply for a permit when she next wants to come back to Singapore. Why, I wonder, cannot Dr Ang be given a passport like all our other citizens?

A person who is sentenced to a 30-year imprisonment often gets his sentence shortened for good behaviour. Why is a person, who has not been charged for anything and who has been punished for 35 years in exile, not treated with the same magnanimity? To Dr Ang, who loves Singapore, being in exile is very painful. As she said, “You do not know what it is like to be homeless until you do not have one.”

By joining the Facebook community, Mr Lee may be progressive, but he still needs to overhaul some of the outdated mindsets in the government machinery in order for it to move in tandem with him.

__________________

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Student's unsanctioned artwork to honour former teachers removed by SOTA

Three days ago, a report about 70 percent of School Of The Arts (SOTA)…

Stern written warning, fine of $300 or charge in court for anyone in breach of safe distancing measures, starting from 9 April

The people who are found to be in breach of elevated safe…

要小贩营业超过12小时? 读者批社企“现代奴隶制”

从2015年开始,国内至少有七座小贩中心,以社会企业模式经营。 本地有114做小贩中心,在2027年前,还会增减13座小贩中心。不过根据卫生部兼环境及水源部高级政务部长许连碹博士,日前在拜访淡滨尼综合站小贩中心时,曾对媒体表示,未来是否会继续沿用社企模式,还有待评估。 早前有小贩反映,他们在这些社企经营的摊位,被征收附加费用,例如高达1千200元的中央清洗碗盘费。而一般社企小贩中心,管理层所征收的中央洗碗盘费用,约介于600-800元。 淡滨尼综合站小贩中心,也被誉为首个24小时营业的小贩中心。 事实上,就有读者在两年前,在咖啡店集团旗下子公司OTMH,于2016年11月正式接管淡滨尼小贩中心前,致函本社申诉,有关社企管理层对小贩们的要求,形同要落实“现代版的奴隶制”。 当时,有关读者有意申请该小贩中心摊位,于是联系社企OTMH公司,被告知业者需至少营业12个小时,最长24小时。 鼓励小贩经营超过12小时 这意味着,要实施现代咖啡店24小时不打烊概念,管理层可以要求摊主们拉长经营时间,也更倾向于把摊位租给愿意长时间工作的小贩,最好是能24小时、每周七天都营业。 读者认为,小贩和其他辛勤工作的新加坡人一样,也需要休息和休假,他们也要陪家人子女。压榨小贩们的劳动和时间,剥夺他们应有的休息,藉此最大化小贩中心的盈利。 该读者也质疑,为何审核小贩申请资格的不再是环境局,而全权交给有关社企公司。 他认为,完全由该公司自行决定而不是公开招标,有欠公平。这是因为小贩中心是用公款建设,政府才是拥有者,社会企业只是管理小贩中心的代理人。 “为何他们(指社企)可以被赋予如此多自由,在不公布遴选过程的情况下,来自行选择小贩?”…

SBS reports increase in profit in second quarter compared to last year

SBS Transit reported on Wednesday that their profits in the second quarter…