The following is a media release by SOS Bukit Brown in response to Minister of State Tan Chuan-Jin’s note 'Bukit Brown…work in progress':

In response to Minister of State, Mr Tan Chuan-Jin’s note posted on Friday, 3 February 2012 at 17:42.

SOS Bukit Brown stand by the position of our petition and we reiterate the need for a fundamental review and open dialogue about the future of Singapore.

We are glad that Mr Tan Chuan-Jin managed to spend time on Bukit Brown with the documentation team.

Mr. Tan has also highlighted the need for land for more housing and this has opened up the debate about overall land needs in Singapore, as well as the increased demand for more land/space that arises from a rising population.

We are sorry to hear that Mr Tan still prioritises construction and the ultimate destruction of Bukit Brown.

The proposed highway will only serve the small and possibly declining population of car owners in Singapore while the whole of Singapore will have to live with the negative consequences resulting from the destruction of Bukit Brown. SingStat notes that there are only 111 cars per 1000 people in Singapore and the government has announced plans to control the car population.

Urbanisation of Bukit Brown will contribute to the devastation of Singapore’s natural environment. It will have potential environmental consequences such as increased flooding, higher local temperatures and contribution to climate change. The recently released “Report by the Expert Panel on Drainage Design and Flood Protection Measures” states that urbanisation is a key cause for the recent spate of flooding in Singapore. The report further notes that Bukit Brown is in the Marina Basin drainage area – the same as the flood-prone Bukit Timah and Orchard Road areas. Building up Bukit Brown will be deadly to the wildlife, including the 13 species of endangered birds that inhabit the wooded area there.

Destruction of Bukit Brown will also contribute to the loss of the Singapore identity and heritage. As the first municipal cemetery of Singapore, 100,000 members of our pioneering generation are laid to rest there from as early as 1830s. These people have helped to make the success of Singapore today and Bukit Brown is the last place ordinary Singaporeans can collectively venerate them.

It is important that Singaporeans treasure our natural environment and history as it is what makes us Singaporean.

Simply creating more highways and housing estates is not the ideal long-term solution towards a more sustainable future for Singapore.

We are happy that Mr Tan has been open about his views. We believe it is now necessary for a fundamental review and open dialogue with all Singaporeans about the future of Singapore.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

社媒发布死讯 儿子证实寻获女尸是母亲

到马来西亚泛舟后失踪女商人的儿子,于今早(8月15日)在社交媒体上公布母亲的死讯。 女商潘玉珍的23岁儿子彭明毓(Louis Pang)在Instagram story和脸书上帖文写道,“你经历了美好且光荣的以上。直到最后一刻,你都做着自己最喜欢的事情。安息吧,妈咪。我爱你。” “你现在可以展翅飞向自由。我保证会把你安全带回家。” 女商26岁的女儿 Ranie Pang也在Instagram分享了其胞弟的帖子,并写道“你永远活在我们的心中”。 他们的帖子是在马来西亚官员于周三,证实在登嘉楼州海岸附近寻获一具尸体的数小时后发出。 马国海事执法机构针对《新加坡雅虎新闻》的询问时指出,尸体被议员寻获时身穿救生衣,在距离两人失踪地点约100海里(185公里)的登嘉楼州瓜拉甘马挽海域,被一名渔夫发现。 惟,今日凌晨彭明毓在数十名亲友的陪同下,抵达甘马挽殓尸房认尸后,证实死者就是其母亲。 女商人潘玉珍和62岁的陈永顺是于上周四,随着13名泛舟团友到柔佛州丰盛港海域泛舟后,遇上强风大浪,被迫离队临时改道。同舟的两人随后在傍晚5时40分被队友发现失踪了。…

Court allows alleged TRS editor to leave S’pore to visit critically ill father

One of the alleged editors of website, The Real Singapore (TRS), has…

骤逝德士司机无法索赔HPS 公积金局:”健康状况严重本不符资格“

德士司机佘春华心脏病骤逝、却被指未呈交病历而无法向家庭保障计划(HPS)索偿。此事也引起中央公积金局关注,特别在《联合早报》交流站回覆佘春华遗孀李悦的投函。 李悦在上周(27日)投书《早报》交流站,以题为《我们家的悲凉中秋》一文,阐述已故丈夫被指在申请家庭保障计划时,没有呈报本身患有糖尿病和心脏疾病,故此无法索偿。 李悦一家还要偿还组屋每月1100元的房贷,还有女儿上大学的费用和生活开销要应付,没有了HPS赔偿,一家陷入困境。 对于李悦一家面对的处境,公积金总署长(通讯署)江佩佩和建屋发展局处长(住屋财务)徐伟强,特别撰文回覆。 “我们谨就李女士丈夫的逝世,向她和她的家人表示深切哀悼。我们正协助李女士家人,并会联系她,看我们如何通过建屋局的财政援助措施,帮助她渡过这段经济困难时期。” 申请HPS需全面披露健康状况 江佩佩和徐伟强阐明,HPS是索取保费支付索赔的保险计划。为维持低廉保费,以及让申请程序简单,会员在申请HPS时,需全面披露健康状况。若在表格填写身体健康的公积金会员,一般无需进一步呈报,就会得到HPS保障。 文中指出,李悦的丈夫佘春华在1998年买了组屋,没有动用公积金储蓄来偿还每月房屋贷款,因此HPS 属非强制性,那个时候佘春华还没有申请HPS。 2013年,佘春华因严重健康问题入院。出院不久,他向建屋局申请购买HPS保险。 跟每个申请HPS组屋屋主一样,建屋局工作人员会向他解释,必须在申请表格上,完整填写健康状况。 文章指出,佘春华在表格中宣称自己在过去五年,没有动过任何手术或住院治疗,也没有申报他住院的医疗状况。HPS…

防假消息法有违《东盟人权宣言》

“政府于今年4月1日提呈新草拟的《防止网络假信息和网络操纵法案》,令我感到震惊,当时真希望那只是愚人节玩笑。” 人权律师张素兰,在功能八号氏族会的脸书专页分享,虽然多方人士都高呼,要求政府重新考虑,或修改或撤销这个防假消息草案,但很显然政府这次是“玩真的”!“ “政府宣称坚持自己的立场,更指我国要成为打击假新闻传播的先锋,难道他们没注意到,自己也是这类问题的最大肇因?” 没公布“罪魁祸首”刑法 张素兰指出,李显龙总理在前日举行的第29届太平洋律师协会大会开幕仪式上,提到反假新闻法案一事。李显龙表示,一旦有关法案起跑,网络媒体会变得更负责任,政府有权对散播假新闻的网络媒体发布更正令,甚至是删除令。 不过,总理却说漏了,那些落网“祸首”又会面对何等严苛的罚款或监禁。国内外的相关组织或单位,该好好警惕! 没公布假新闻界定 她也披露,有关草案并没有界定什么是“虚假的事实陈述”,可以说是一切取决于部长们的想法,“他们觉得是,那么就是了”。这几乎成了一言堂,却是新加坡律法,包括在内部安全法令中,通用的语言。她批评到,“行政部门简直被赋予无可比拟的权利了”。 她也对总理谈及要如何遵守法治一事的认真语气,感到惊讶。惟,这也是让她感到可悲的部分。“对我而言,新加坡颁布了许多法律,取消了我们的人权,与其说是法治,更正确来说是”依法而治“(rule by law),这是马来西亚在巫统失去政权前,常用的术语之一。任何违法成文法的行为,均属犯罪。根据法律,一个人的游行或抗议都属犯罪。” 对此,她亿述曾有脸书网友问道,为何艺术家施兰和社运分子范国瀚这样的人,明知道我国法律禁止个人抗议或游行,却还故意违法?…