the following is a brief report of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’a speech in Parliament today on Ministerial salaries:

Speaking in Parliament today, PM Lee said that the issue is not just whether salary is “correct” or “incorrect”, but if the basis is proper and legitimate.  He said that the key is to find right balance between idealism and pragmatism; and to find a formula that is acceptable to citizens and one that will work well.
He also said that the Ministerial salary issue should not be just about the amount of money, but also about Singapore’s future; to ensure that Singapore always has a good government.  In selecting a team of MPs and ministers, the overriding priority is to build the best team for Singapore.
PM Lee also stated that many good officers, now in the civil service, would have been lost to the private sector, if the civil service did not pay well. If one chooses to become an MP, the PM reminded, there is no certainty of success, you may lose your job-specific skills and there is also no turning back.
If money had been a consideration they would not even have been fielded as MPs, said the PM, let alone be brought into the government.
The MPs have come in to serve Singapore and for them salaries are not a make or break issue. Although some did decline to be MPs but not because of pay.
Heng Swee Keat, a former top civil servant for example declined (due to children) when first approached.  But he agreed subsequently taking a substantial pay cut.
PM Lee said that he had grappled with the salary issue his entire career, from SAF in the 80s to adjusting civil service pay, when it lagged behind the private sector.  He agreed that ministerial pay remains an issue with Singaporeans who feel that Ministers’ salary were too high and that it should not pegged to private sector or that ministers are deciding their own pay.
The concerns of Singaporeans are reasonable said the PM. No government can function without the interests of people at heart, he acknowledged. He said that this issue cannot be resolved in the heat of election.
PM Lee reiterated that salary is critical but what’s more worrisome is the ability to assemble the best team to serve Singapore, which remains a constant worry for him. The government needs people of different backgrounds and aspirations, but cannot afford to have our entire system based on this, he said. He also emphasised that bigger monetary sacrifice won’t deter more public-spirited Singaporeans from coming forward to serve and that there have been Singaporeans who have come forward.
He reminded that there is a need to be pragmatic. Overall this approach has worked for Singapore and today we have a strong committed team, he said.  It may not be perfect, but it works.
PM Lee emphasised that we are a little red dot and that our survival and success will always be based on our ability to be extra-ordinary.  And he also stated that there is no one to bail us out.
Touching on the suggestion to follow other countries in the Ministerial salaries issue, PM Lee said that we need to be realistic. Others have their own problems and are not in same situation as Singapore, he said.
Some foreign leaders have also privately expressed to him that they wished to follow Singapore’s model on salaries, but cannot because of politics, and that they are impressed with Singapore’s Ministers. PM Lee said that a good government will remain critical to Singapore which will face different challenges and that it cannot work on auto-pilot.
He said that a country cannot be run by technocrats and that Singapore politics is changing and so it will be more difficult to find potential Ministers.  And if ministerial salaries are uncompetitive, it will just add another obstacle to people who have something to contribute to Singapore.
The ‘Pink’ identity card is a Singapore dividend said PM Lee, as many have high regard for Singapore and Singaporeans.  If people stop having high regard for us, we will be in trouble, he reminded.
PM Lee said that ultimately his responsibility is to ensure that individually each minister is performing up to expectations and that Cabinet delivers the best Government.  Ministers must be held accountable no matter what they are paid.  A good minister does not do what the PM tells him to do but is entrepreneurial, he said.
A minister’s responsibility cannot be a formula, PM Lee emphasised, because not every Minister is equal. Some are different in judgement and ability, he admitted. But they are all in one team, the PM stressed.
In conclusion, PM Lee said that he does not expect his speech to be the last word on the issue of Ministerial salaries, but that he needs the right system to help the next team to succeed.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

网商“坐地起价” 网购平台:恶意抬价就下架!

自新型冠状病毒(前称武汉肺炎)疫情爆发以来,我国口罩成为民众抢购物品,甚至一度出现“口罩荒”,也有一些网卖商家纷纷抬高价格,从5倍至20倍左右。网路购物平台旋转拍卖(Carousell)与Qoo10欲请卖家勿“坐地起价”。 旋转拍卖与Qoo10认为在疫情爆发之际,抬高口罩价格的卖家乃牟取暴利,因此要求卖家停止高额出售口罩。 旋转拍卖营运副总裁陈素玲向媒体表示,近期内将和卖家取得直接联系,并建议他们为口罩合理定价,公平分发口罩,若发现定价不合理的口罩将要求卖家纠正,而卖家如不遵循,将可能会被撤下。 Qoo10的总经理涂家林则与旋转拍卖持有相同的观点,表示将对“坐地起价,试图引发公众忧虑与恐慌,借此牟取暴利的商人采取行动。“ 他表示,“一经调查后,若发现商家借此恶意抬高价格,将可能会被停止在本平台出售任何商品。” 自疫情爆发以来,全球亦开始陷入恐慌,据卫生部的消息指出,我国目前确诊病例已达10例,患者正接受治疗,而口罩也成了必备的防御工具,为能避免受到感染,许多民众也纷纷抢购口罩,其中最抢手的即是高防御性的外科口罩。 尽管卫生部再度劝导目前身体状况良好的民众无需用到外科口罩,但仍然陷入“口罩荒“。在职总平价合作社(NTUC FairPrice)的官网上可见,外科口罩与N95口罩目前已缺货中;而在屈臣氏的网站上亦可见,至少四种类型的口罩已卖光,而网络上有许多网民也拍下为口罩排长龙的的照片和视频。 而零售商也表示,他们目前也正与供应商合作,引进新的口罩库存。 对此,当局也呼吁,外科口罩对于感到不适,出现咳嗽或流鼻涕,或有呼吸道疾病的民众才有效,若身体状况良好,民众是不需要戴上口罩的。 尽管如此,也仍无法阻止口罩抢购一空。 口罩价格竟涨至5至20倍…

The Singapore Government Doublespeak Dictionary

By Masked Crusader Understanding what the government really means when they say…

两车相撞毁大厦外墙! 所幸两名司机仅轻伤

今日(6日)上午,莱佛士广场地铁站的AIA大厦外发生骇人车祸,两辆轿车相撞并撞毁大厦墙壁,墙瓦脱落,其中一辆车子更是侧翻,场面如同动作电影场景。 所幸两名司机均属轻伤,62岁德士司机在意识清醒下被送往新加坡中央医院,而另为男性司机则被现场医护人员救治,惟拒绝进一步到医院接受治疗。 该起车祸发生在今早10点前,车祸发生后,立即被路人拍摄下来上传至网络,迅速引起网民疯传。 从照片上可见,一辆蓝色相信是德士的轿车与银色的私家车撞上,德士内已弹出安全气囊,而银色车子侧翻,救难人员需从车子的另一边将受害者救出。 此外,大厦的状况也可见损毁不少,墙瓦脱落,可见当时冲击力不小,但目测并未伤及大厦的主要架构。 警方表示,事故仍在侦办中。 网友EstherTan :我的天啊!我希望他们都能够平安,AIA大厦要再次检查,万一内部有裂痕呢 部分网民则形容整个场景如同香港电影般刺激,有些人更称像是看了一场成龙的电影 网友Eric Chia :很赞的场景,好像那些香港电视剧…

公积金局称申诉老翁已领出14万 网民非议当局公开会员财务个资

七旬私召车司机申诉,自己每月只能从公积金领取575元,无法负担自己和妻子的生活。但开私召车,又被要求要填补保健储蓄。对此公积金局在昨日在脸书发声明,这名司机在55岁时已领出14万元,更指如果当初他没领钱,每月领入息可超过1千元。 然而,公积金局的答复仍引来网民非议,有者质疑当局公开会员的财务私隐是否妥当?再者,这名司机质问的重点是,为何保健储蓄已有钱还要填补,否则将无法更新私召车执照? 事缘上月24日,名为克里福德(Clifford Theseira)的72岁私召车司机申诉,自己的公积金储蓄只能每月领入息575新元,由于不足以承担夫妻俩生活费用,自己只好开私召车营生,不过上了年纪又不能开太久,实则收入有限。 他提到自己的保健储蓄(medisave)户头还有6万元,可是仍被要求要填补保健储蓄保费,而来自公积金局的信函也提到,若不填补将无法更新私召车司机执照。 “(保健储蓄)里我有6万元,如果我在这笔钱动用前离世,我的钱会怎样?我自己的钱为何我不能用。 如果我的执照吊销了,我能不能申领福利?哎呀,这里是新加坡,是没有免费的。” 公积金局公开克里福德公积金个资 对此,公积金局在昨日的脸书贴文声称克里福德“未反映事实的全部”,指他在55岁那年已领出14万元,如果当初没这么做,如今他每月领入息能超过千元。 “再者,克里福德还联名拥有一座已还清的五房式组屋”。 公积金局称当事人可以透过财路(GIRO)分期填补自己的保健储蓄户头,每月缴付额估计不超过月入的1巴仙。“只要他和其他雇员一样缴交,他仍能在明年7月到期前更新执照。” 公积金局更扬言,克里福德作为建国一代,已经从政府度援助措施受惠。仅在今年就已收到保健储蓄补贴和终身健保的特别保费津贴,也获取超过2300元包括现金和公积金在内的就业入息补助。…