the following is a media release by Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA) and Think Centre at the 18th Regular Session of the UN Human Rights Council Item 6: Universal Periodic Review (UPR) Plenary on Singapore:


Thank you, Madam President. The government of Singapore’s central argument during the UPR Working Group session on 6 May 2011 was that a “balance” between economic prosperity and restrictions on fundamental rights and freedoms are necessary in the Singaporean context,[1] yet the outcomes of the General and Presidential Elections held in May and August 2011 indicate that the Singaporean society no longer accepts this rhetoric. FORUM-ASIA and its member Think Centre welcome Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s editorial in the People’s Action Party magazine, Petir, which acknowledged that politics must “evolve to become more consultative and inclusive”.[2] As a concrete first step towards adjusting policies to serve the people better, we urge the government to genuinely and meaningfully engage with a broader selection of civil society in the UPR follow-up process.

In line with the growing sensitisation of Singaporean society with regards to promotion and protection of human rights, we urge the government to sincerely revisit its positions on capital punishment and preventive detention laws by engaging in open consultations with civil society and the general public. We reiterate the recommendations posed by Canada, the Czech Republic, Finland and France that the government impose an indefinite moratorium on the death penalty, with the view towards its complete abolition, to enable the time and space for Singaporeans to engage in open and robust debate on the application of the death penaltyand to explore alternate sentencing options which are in line with international human rights norms and standards. Furthermore, we maintain our call to repeal the Internal Security Act (ISA) and the Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act (CLTPA), which impair the right to due processand judicial protection. These draconian laws are pointless since the Criminal Procedures Code as well as the Penal Code stipulate necessary measures for national security.

Madam President, while the government provided the UPR Working Group with assurances of its policies on migrant labour in Singapore, no efforts are being made to bring the current regulations fully in line with international standards to protect the rights of migrant workers in the country. We highlight the recommendation put forward by Indonesia and appeal to the government to ratify the International Convention of the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Their Families (ICMW) without delay as well as to review and amend all applicable legislations in this respect, particularly the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act, the Employment Agencies Act and the Employment Act. Though no recommendations were put forward by the UPR Working Group with regards to minimum wage for foreign and local workers in Singapore, we view it as an integral component of the rights of all workers to attain a decent and adequate standard of living. As such, FORUM-ASIA and Think Centre strongly urge the government to look beyond the pure economic perspective and adopt arights-based approach in the consideration of a minimum wage legislation. Thank you, Madam President.


[1] FORUM-ASIA and Think Centre,Press Release, “UN’s Human Rights Review of Singapore: All Rights AreDerogable Upon National Context?”, 7 May 2011

[2] People’s Action Party, Petir,“New Phase in Politics”, July/August 2011

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Pragmatitis

This article was first posted on The Offline Citizen. by Joshua Chiang…

无视马路上野鸡群直驶而过 网友怒批驾驶者冷血

网友看到一辆车子无视在马路上觅食的野鸡一家,直接开过去,几乎导致“家破人亡”,愤而在脸书上帖文怒骂,也引起其他网民的议论纷纷。 在脸书群组All Singapore Stuff昨日(12日)有网民上传了一段视频,写到“怎么能够这样驾车(赶)走鸡群”。 短短只有九秒的视频中,只见一辆黑色轿车自惹兰柏民宾(Jalan Pemimpin)的Mapex大楼驶出,无视马路上正在觅食的野鸡一家,包括一只公鸡和母鸡以及九只小鸡,就直接开过去跑了。野鸡群看到车辆驶来时纷纷逃避,所幸无“鸡”受伤或死亡。车子开走时,一名站在马路中央的老伯目睹整个过程,甚至呼喊了黑车司机,要求对方注意。 大部分网友都炮轰轿车司机没良心、冷血、驾驶技术有问题,因为出路时并没有左右观察就出路了。“若连路上这么多鸡仔都看不到,到底怎么考到驾照的”。 但是也有部分网民敦促他人不要看图说故事,也有可能是老伯在路上喂食,导致鸡群聚集在路中央,危及驾驶者。

马国首相:若人民认为有需要,或探讨重新落实消费税

马来西亚自去年国阵政府败选后,新政府上任随即宣布取消消费税,以销售与服务税(SST)取代。但近日,政府却表示,若人民认为有需要,或探讨重启消费税(GST)。 首相敦马今日出席内政部安全与公共秩序推介礼,有记者提出马国经济研究院(MIER) 曾指应该重启消费税,并将税率调整至3巴仙,敦马针对此事作出回应。 “如果这是公众需求,我们会探讨会对此进行研究”,他表示。但敦马也表明,该项目不会列入2020年的财政预算案。 据悉,销售及服务税(SST)是只针对特定对象,如生产商或进口商及一些服务业者,但消费税的征税对象几乎涵盖所有人,只要有消费就必须缴税。换言之,从生产商、批发商、零售商、进出口商到最终的消费者,每个层面都必须缴税。但销售及服务税只针对特定对象,如生产商或进口商及一些服务业者。 但SST落实后,许多人仍投诉物价并因此下降,因此民怨四起。日前,《诗华日报》报导,大马经济研究院(MIER)也呼吁政府在2020年财政预算案中,以3%的较低税率,重新落实物品及消费税(GST)。经济智囊机构主席丹斯里卡玛沙烈(Tan Sri Kamal Salih)形容消费税反而更显公平,而且该系统也在2015年原油价格下跌至每桶36美元时,平衡了政府的收入来源。 对此,马国消费人联合会(FOMCA)则表示,消费税已给予众人许多负面形象,例如以往6巴仙税率,特别是在必需品上,已经给人民带来很重的负担,故若要重启恐怕不易实行。

Government to ease circuit breaker restrictions gradually, expects citizens to be "very careful" to avoid new clusters

As the circuit breaker is being set to end on 1 June,…