by: Leong Sze Hian/

I refer to the article “When a charity’s business does too well …“ (ST, Aug 1).

It states that “Charity organisation The Helping Hand’s business, which includes selling teak furniture made by residents at its halfway house, did so well it now has to charge customers goods and services tax. About 100 charities are already GST-registered“.

In developed countries like the United Kingdom, I understand that charities and religious organizations are generally exempt from taxation.

I would like to suggest that the tax regime for charities in Singapore be reviewed, with a view to reducing or exempting them from taxation.

Taxing charities

The 7 per cent Goods and Services Tax (GST) and 18 per cent corporate tax rate, if waived for charities, may go a long way towards enabling them to do  more for their beneficiaries.

This may particularly be of greater significance and impact to the smaller charities.

Whilst the 2.5 times tax deduction for donations to charities that have Institution of Public Character (IPC) status encourage individuals and corporations to donate to charities, reducing or waiving taxation on charities may encourage more people to set up and run charities.

As to “Among the guidelines is one that states that the income of a charity’s business subsidiary is subject to income tax, and that profits have to be ploughed back to the charity as dividends, not donations”, I would like to suggest that this be reviewed, as it may discourage charities to set up subsidiary social enterprises, as in effect, the subsidary paying dividends is less favourable than any other entity paying the same amount to get a charitable tax deduction.

Taxes vs Help payouts

What is the total GST and income taxes paid by the charity sector in a year?

In contrast, how much does the Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports (MCYS) spend on helping needy Singaporeans in a year?

When GST was last raised from 5 to 7 per cent, the reason given was that it was to help needy Singaporeans.

Shouldn’t there be an accounting of how the estimated $2 billion GST increase has been utilised to help the poor?

With the Mayors of the Community Development Councils (CDCs) raising funds on their own to help residents who don’t get enough help from existing assistance schemes, the question is why, in spite of the GST increase revenue?

Moreover, arguably, the taxation of the charity sector may also have increased with the growth of the sector in recent years.

People generally feel good when they do something charitable.  Perhaps having no taxes may make them feel even better.


Support TOC! Buy Leong Sze Hian’s book here!

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Chee Hong Tat now says he supports learning of dialects – in private

New People’s Action Party (PAP) candidate, Chee Hong Tat, says it is…

Three men imprisoned for abetting illegal departure from Woodlands Checkpoint

Three men has been sentenced to jail for arranging the illegal departure…

SRC makes initial $50,000 contribution for relief and recovery efforts in Nepal and appeals for contribution

The Singapore Red Cross (SRC) will be disbursing SGD $50,000 worth of…

令建制派辗转难眠的陈、李早餐会

前总统选举参选人陈清木医生,与建国总理李光耀次子李显扬,于昨早9时,在金文泰2街第726座的西海岸坊饮食中心熟食中心共进早餐。 陈清木较后在脸书贴文声称,由于已一段时间没见,所以想与李显扬聚聚。 陈清木说与其到豪华餐厅,不如到小贩中心吃早餐,而李显扬也极为同意。“李显扬相当怀念本地小贩美食,我们叫了粥、咖啡和油条。这是很赞的早餐,不只是美食,还有我们对当今全球和本土时局相互交流表达看法。” 他提到由于是周日早晨,小贩中心挤满前来用餐的家庭,他们也受到很多民众热烈欢迎和支持,并要求合照。“居民的热情和鼓励令我们很感动,我会多来” 陈清木也是1980-2006年的亚逸拉惹区国会议员,上述小贩中心也位于其选区。亚逸拉惹目前并入西海岸集选区。 他曾在2011年竞逐总统,不过以7382票(0.34巴仙)的微差败给陈庆炎。2017年的总统则因为选举资格保留给马来族,而错失参选资格。 而在今年7月28日,陈清木受邀出席本土七个反对党的聚会,商讨组成联盟事宜。当时陈清木曾在个人脸书坦言“现已78高龄,引导这团队为国服务的时光或许有限,但这是眼前的一线机遇,是“乌巴(ubah,即马来语“改变”)”的时机,我愿在我有生之年,将我生平从政的经验传承给下一代。” 他强调,如果看到改革的转机却什么都不做,他将感到后悔。 至于李显扬则曾在新加坡民航局任职九年,于今年6月30日正是卸任。作为现任总理李显龙的弟弟,曾因欧思礼路38号故居的去留问题,和哥哥失和。 有网民呼吁陈、李一同“参政救国” 虽然陈清木已明言,只是想和许久未见的李显扬聚聚,不过许多网民揣测两人见面的意义远大于此,而网路的言论也一面倒给与两人支持,甚至呼吁二人参政。 有评论则指出陈、李二人吃早餐,可能吃出更长远的政治意义。首先,陈清木选择在西海岸坊饮食中心吃早餐,以实际行动给力近期陷入社企管理风波的小贩们。…