by: Ghui/

Many have called Mr Wang Pei Fei a foreign “talent” who insulted Singapore. While it’s true that Wang’s ‘foreign’, it’s not true that he is a ‘talent’ (in the sense we understand it).

Wang was an overseas student. He was not a scholar who had been offered any favours by the Singapore government. He was a paying student attending a private school. We were actually making money from him.

While I deeply abhor his comments, I cannot help but question if he is a scapegoat for a deeper issue.

Some have commented that had Wang been a Singaporean, he would have been questioned and/or detained by the authorities and implied that he was permitted to flee because he was a Chinese national.

Singapore is a multiracial country and of course no form of racism, especially on a public platform should be tolerated. But that being said, I doubt the assertion that Singaporeans would have received greater censure than Wang.

There are many remarks made along racial lines in Singapore everyday. Phrases such as “ah nei”, “turbanator”,”prata man” are but some of the derogatory racist terms hurled at the minority races in Singapore. Most notably, comments of this nature were used liberally to criticise Vikram Nair and President Nathan.

I have yet to see any Singaporean prosecuted for that. Nor have these comments attracted the furore that this video clip generated.

I am not defending Wang. All I am saying is that his comments are no worse than many racist and ignorant statements that have been uttered by Singaporeans against Singaporeans!

Perhaps, the majority are oblivious to these offensive taunts because it was not directed at them. Wang’s tirade on the other hand was; for not only did he make jibes at the Malay and Indian community, he also took pot shots at Chinese Singaporeans by making fun of their command of Mandarin. His comments on Singaporeans’ command of English likewise affected all Singaporeans, including the Chinese community.

If we demand for action to be taken against Wang, then action must also be taken against all Singaporeans who have made and who make hateful remarks along racial lines in a public forum. Punishment must also be equal for all perpetrators regardless of nationality. There cannot be one set of rules for Singaporeans and another set for foreigners who are legitimately in our country.

While there are arguments against foreigners taking up jobs meant for Singaporeans, Wang is not such a foreigner at the time the video was made. He was a fee paying student attending a private school. There is no evidence to suggest that he was working in Singapore at the time the video was made.

In our justified anger at insulting comments made about our country, we should not confuse the issues. Foreign talents taking up jobs meant for Singaporeans is a separate issue from fee paying students studying in Singapore.

Wang’s video was indeed offensive but it was no more offensive than comments that have been made by Singaporeans to other Singaporeans along racial lines. Before Singaporeans condemn Wang, we should also reflect on our own prejudices against other races within Singapore. If it is not acceptable for Wang to make such comments, it is even more unacceptable for Singaporeans to make comments of such nature against other Singaporeans. The knife should cut both ways.

Perhaps the massive reaction that Wang’s video garnered is the manifestation of the frustration of Singaporeans against the large influx of foreigners. In our frustration however, we should not confuse the issue of Wang with the issue of foreign talents. While Wang’s video is deplorable and does deserve censure, the colossal backlash it has generated is perhaps an overreaction.

His student visa has been cancelled, he has lost $10,000 and fled the country. Let’s not make this a Singaporeans versus foreigners issue.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

毕丹星被指定为国会在野党领袖

工人党秘书长毕丹星表示,将会竭尽所能履行应尽职责,成为在国会的在野党领袖。 上周五大选成绩宣布,工人党一举拿下10个国会议席,三个选区,成为我国首次有双位数民选在野党议员的政党。 总理李显龙也在此后提出将正式认可毕丹星为在野党领袖,并将会提供适当的人员和资源,以便他履行职责。 委任在野党领袖,也与奉行英国西敏寺式国会制度的其他国家相仿,例如英国、新西兰、澳洲等。 不过尚未知是否新加坡工人党有意推出影子内阁,惟该党仍继续放眼取下国会三分之一议席为中期目标。 毕丹星早期已在脸书上回应,将会竭尽所能履行应尽的职责。 “针对李显龙总理的记者招待会一事,对于反对党领袖一职感到非常期待,并将尽我所能履行我的职责。我会确保工人党在我的领军下能够继续忠于新加坡和所有国人。” 不过,他也提醒行动党仍会竭尽所能重夺盛港、阿裕尼和后港。该党须加倍努力,以诚信和真诚服务选民。 工人党在本届大选取得优越成绩,不仅高票守住后港和阿裕尼,也一举拿下盛港集选区。对此,李显龙在记者会上表示,该成绩也反映了年轻选民的诉求,除了希望执政党持续,也希望国会内有更多反对党的声音出现。 因此,李显龙表示,执政党也会携手和反对当一同维护国家利益。 李总理表示:“这也取决于反对党的表现,才能说服投资者,让他们相信新加坡拥有负责任的反对党,不仅了解国家利益,也把国家利益摆在政党政治之前。”

电动滑板车禁令影响生计 约30名快递员集体申诉

电动滑板车禁令于周一颁布后,直接打击到我国将近7000名外卖快递员的生计,约30名快递员到宏茂桥3到的人民行动党支部,希望能够在李显龙总理与民会面的地点,向总理当面申诉有关禁令所带来的不便,希望能够获得解决方案。 这群快递员于昨日(11月6日)晚上8时,到宏茂桥3到第322座组屋集合请愿。其实这并非他们首次做出申诉,这周以来,他们及其他同行都向部长申诉,希望能够看到一线生机。 据悉,虽然快递员们似乎有些愤怒,但是现场秩序良好。 现场负责接见选民的义工们将快递员的申诉记录后,建议他们进行联名请愿,让政府了解受影响的人数和情况等。 有快递员申诉道,他们选择当快递员实属不得已,但是面对政府在过去陆续颁布的指示行事,包括要求符合UL2272防火标准、行驶速度、重量等,他们都一一遵循了。但是,现如今却要禁止在人行道上行驶,简直加剧了他们的困境。 “现在所有人都因为电板车使用者撞死人,就要求禁用,但矛头应该针对肇事者才对,不要打翻我们的饭碗。” 蓝彬明尚穆根会见快递员 除了当局,其他的部长也接见了快递员的申诉,其中包括内政部长兼律政部长尚穆根,以及交通部兼卫生部高级政务部长蓝彬明医生。 蓝彬明指出,他曾向申诉者解释实施有关措施的考量,并且给出一些建议,如改用其他工具等。“我尝试了解他们家庭所受到的影响,若有必要,福利委员会也能提供援助。” 尚穆根也在其脸书上帖文指出,他约30名骑电板车的快递员会面。他起初遇见三人,随后就要求和其他的人见面,因此大家都来了。“当时我们在空旷的地区会面,所以我请他们靠近一些,方便我们互相聆听。” 他指出,会面现场一切顺利,他解释了自己的离场后,快递员们也分享了各自立场和困境。尚穆根表示,他也承诺会将快递员们的反映和观点,转达给交通部和内阁,此举令快递员们非常感激。 他也指出,将会针对此事再次召开会议。…

【冠状病毒19】本地死亡病例增至16例 60岁本地公民病逝

根据卫生部昨晚(5月1日)发布的文告,一名60岁新加坡男子,感染冠状病毒19后,不幸因并发症病逝。这意味着本地死亡病例已累计16例。 有关男子是第2728例确诊病患,是在上月13日确诊,同时也有高血压和高脂血症病史。他在昨日不幸病逝,国家传染病中心已联系其家属提供协助。 昨日本地新增932例确诊,累计确诊1万7101起。不过与此同时,也有一名102岁确诊老妇战胜病毒,康复出院。该老妇也是李亚妹安老院的住户。 本地目前累计康复病例增至1268例。 社区感染病例增11例 在昨日新增932例中,其中11例属于社区感染病例,六人为工作准证持有者,五人为本地公民或永久居民。