by: Leong Sze Hian/
with contributions from: Ravi Philemon/

The Ministry of National Development’s (MND) replied today in a letter titled, “Ministry to review DBSS housing option” (Straits Times, 22 June 2011) to another letter in the Straits Times Forum, “Four questions on DBSS” (dated 21 June 2011).

In her reply Ms Lee May Gee, Deputy Director, Housing Division, MND said that “Land for DBSS flats is sold via open tender to private developers.” This statement begs the asking, “how much money has been made from selling such ‘HDB’ land to private developers?”

Ms Lee goes on to say in her reply that “DBSS flat buyers are indeed subsidised by the Government, but (that) they receive their subsidy directly through the Central Provident Fund housing grants.” Since not everybody may be eligible for such grants, can the MND give the breakdown of how many people actually received such housing grants, and how much it was?

While MND’s at it, please do also let us know how much was the total money made from such lands sales, compared to the total housing grants?

By saying “so far, 5,500 DBSS units have been built and sold (and that) they make up a small proportion of public housing, but are well appreciated by the buyers“, Ms Lee seems to have given a clue as to how much more the private developers and HDB may have made from Design, Build and Sell Scheme (DBSS).

The article ‘Prices slashed after DBSS flats uproar‘ in The Straits Times (dated 22 June 2011) says that the private developers are lowering the prices of its Design, Build and Sell Scheme (DBSS) flats at Centrale 8 in Tampines by more than $100,000 because of the public outrage.

What this would suggest is that, even after slashing the selling price, the private developers may make a tidy profit from DBSS.

If we do a simple calculation and multiply the excess profit made by the private developer of this development being $100,000, by the 5,500 DBSS flats sold, it may mean that buyers have ‘overpaid’ by over 550 million dollars for these DBSS flats.

Would MND please clarify how much profits in total have HDB and the private developers made from DBSS so far?

Singaporeans have been complaining about the issue of DBSS pricing policy for years. It is good that the Minister for National Development has now heard the public outcry on this issue, has stopped making statements like “DBSS is not HDB“, and has agreed to review the DBSS housing option as part of the overall review of housing policies.

Let’s hope that in this overall review of housing policies, MND would re-focus HDB back to its roots; that of providing subsidised and affordable housing for all Singaporeans.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

资媒局要求STR部落格删“不实文章” 《砂报告》:克莱尔未被咨询

资讯通讯媒体发展局(IMDA)指出,时事部落格States Times Review(STR)一篇誌期本月5日的文章“不实和含诽谤成分”,要求该部落格在今日5时前撤下有关文章。 资媒局经评估后认为,该文章已破坏了公众对新加坡政府的信心,同时抵触《互联网运作准则》(Internet Code of Practice)中“被禁止内容”(prohibited content)条款 若STR未删文,该局将指示互联网服务提供商,限制公众访问该网站。 有关文章标题为“李显龙成为一马公司弊案关键调查对象”,指马来西亚和新加坡签署了数项不平等协议,作为换取新加坡银行替一马公司资金洗黑钱的代价。 STR拒绝删文  “恭候总理起诉”…

Govt Borrowings: Benefit S’poreans?

by Leong Sze Hian I refer to the Accountant-General’s Department’s report –…

PM Lee Hsien Loong wishes speedy recovery for Malaysian PM's surgery

Malaysian Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak successfully underwent a minor surgery…

砂商家获准证卖鞭炮 仅限十五种

在新加坡,政府自70年代就制定《危险烟火法》,严禁民众使用和拥有烟火,民间团体若要燃放,也许获得政府核实安全标准是否合格才能批准。 不过在马来西亚砂拉越,当地有商家获得准证,在佳节期间公开贩售鞭炮。 根据马国《星洲日报》采访古晋警区主任,证实该警区约发出了十余张售卖鞭炮烟花的执照,不过仅限佳节期间如农历新年、开斋节、达雅节和圣诞节时使用。 这些执照有期限,执照有效期至元宵节,且只限出售十五种鞭炮,包括传统顺利红炮和烟花。商家要向内政部批准的代理公司申请,待对方批准后,商家再向警方申请执照。 不代表民间能公开购买 不过,马国总警长弗兹在受媒体询问时又表示“毫不知情”,又强调不是所有鞭炮都可以合法售卖,即使持有准证也不例外。 不过,也有当地律师认为,即便商家有合法准证卖烟火,不代表民众可以公然购买。许多社团组织举行庆典,其实都是在无准证情况下燃放,实际上警方也是“睁一只眼闭一只眼”。他劝民众还是不买鞭炮为妙,以免惹麻烦。 就在去年,吉隆坡一家得易购(TESCO)商场公开售卖鞭炮,虽然声称获得警方批准许可,不过最后仍受警方取缔。理由是马国可公开贩售的烟花,仅限“POP-POP”和“HAPPY BOOM”两种,但要贩卖仍需向地方警区申请准证。 在马国,1996年就已出台《鞭炮与烟花禁令》,燃放鞭炮罚款100令吉或监禁不超过一个月,生产“爆炸物”就罚款2000令吉,收藏“爆炸物”就罚款700令吉,拥有“爆炸物”罚款300令吉。