(Part 3 of the Singapore Census 2010 series)

by Leong Sze Hian

Going by the volume of postings, comments and debate on the internet, the one statistic in the recently released Singapore Census 2010, that is arguably the most contentious, is that the number of single Singaporeans is on the rise.

According to the article “Number of single Singaporeans on the rise” (ST, Jan 13) , “one in three residents – or one million of those who call Singapore home – is single”. In percentage terms, the figure has gone up from 30 per cent a decade ago to 32 per cent today.

If this statistic is broken down into Singaporeans and permanent residents (PRs), it would be interesting to know how many Singaporeans, relative to the total adult citizen population are single.

HDB: New hope for singles?

One of the perennial issues that singles lament about, is their housing predicament. Singaporean singles have to wait until they are 35, before they can buy a resale HDB flat.

Before the recent clarification by the HDB, hardly anyone knew that two Singaporean siblings below 35 whose parents are not in Singapore and do not own a HDB flat, can apply to buy a resale flat, on a case-by-case basis.

In contrast, it was widely known that two PR siblings below 35 can buy under the same conditions.

So, with the HDB new flats’ Minimum Occupation Period (MOP) raised from three to five years in August last year, and the construction of Build-to-order (BTO) flats getting longer to about five years now, it would take a total of about 10 years before the ramped up offer of BTOs last year and this year, becomes available in the resale market, for singles to buy.

By that time, with resale prices continuing to escalate, many singles may not be able to afford one.

It’s like a double whammy – more singles and a longer period before new flats can be sold in the resale market.

BTO: 32 months to build?

Whilst on the subject of BTOs, I would like to refer to the article “Shorter wait for BTO flats” (ST, Jan 12). 
It states that “Flats under the build-to-order (BTO) scheme in the last two years were completed in 32 months on average”.

According to the HDB’s web site, the Estimated Delivery Possession Date (EDPD) for the last four BTOs in December, November and October, is 66, 58, 53, and 60 months, respectively.

The EDPD dates for the subject four BTOs are 31 May 2016, 30 September 2015, 31 March 2015 and 31 October 2015, respectively. So, why is the BTO EDPD getting so much longer?

Since Mr Mah said in August last year that the waiting time for BTO flats launched after the middle of this year would be “about 2-1/2 years, or 30 months”, why are BTOs now about 60 months?

Finally, why is it that when the HDB built very little flats, the average BTO was 32 months, and now that it is building 38,000 flats in two years (“HDB to roll out more BTO flats in 2011”, BT, Oct 22), which is more than the total number built over the last 10 years or so, the time to build is getting so much longer?

Whilst all the above seems rather confusing, perhaps there is one thing that we may be certain of – the Minister of National Development obviously never read the HDB web site’s BTO information sheet which contains the EDPD data.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

AHPETC responds to MCCY minister's article on town council financial matters

In a statement released by Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC) on 10 December,…

One country, two systems

Is the capitalist free market system best for a country? By Tan Kin Lian.

Nigerian national set to be hanged at dawn tomorrow for trafficking of Cannabis after Apex Court dismisses last ditch appeal

Chijoke Stephan Obioha, a Nigerian graduate who first came to Singapore for…

马国警方煽动法逮捕批评者 元首后对拘捕行动失望

本月11日,马来西亚元首后东姑阿兹札突然关闭推特账号,结果引起网民议论,社交媒体甚至盛传元首后被“网络霸凌”,结果引来马国警方援引煽动法,逮捕“批评者”。 据了解,马国警方援引《1984年煽动法令》第4条文,并在13日晚上,逮捕社会主义党前青年团长卡立伊斯玛,后者被指曾批评元首后。 警方这一举动也引来马国社运组织痛批。元首后不得不在今早重启账号,澄清自己关闭账号,是基于个人因素,根本与那些批评留言无关。 东姑阿兹札在帖文中称,自己是得到女儿提醒,才获悉警方为了批评言论而逮捕两人,只好重启账号作出澄清。 “当我得知警方拘留有关批评者时,我感到伤心和愤怒。我重申,我停用账号不是因为他们(批评者)。” 她也指出,这些年来她和马国国家元首,也从未对那些批评人士采取过法律行动,因为马国是自由国度。 她续指已请王宫官员,转告警方不要采取行动。 至于卡立此前则否认,自己没有发表过任何有关元首后的推文;社会主义党副主席阿鲁,则批评警方晚上拉人的恐吓性举动,理应可避免,只要把当事人青岛警局协助调查即可,再者,他重申马国希盟政府应履行承诺,废除被视为违反人权的煽动法。