The following is a letter sent by Leong Sze Hian to the Straits Times’ forum:

Source: flickr.com

THE Housing Board’s clarification (‘HDB clarifies rule on siblings’; Monday) that unmarried siblings below age 35 – be they citizens or permanent residents (PRs) – can apply to buy HDB resale flats if their parents live overseas and do not already own a public flat, is odd.

The public and real estate industry are largely unaware that unmarried citizen siblings below age 35 can apply and be considered on a case-by-case basis.

By contrast, it has been common knowledge that two PR siblings below 35 years of age can buy a resale flat. How would citizen siblings apply when few citizens know about it?

Could the HDB publish the statistics as to how many citizen siblings have applied and how many cases were approved?

In the article, Dennis Wee Group director Chris Koh was quoted as saying that less than 5 per cent of HDB resale flats sold fall into the siblings category. Can the HDB reveal how many PR siblings have bought resale HDB flats?

It is hard to agree with the HDB’s view that its rules treat citizen and PR siblings similarly.

For instance, it is almost a given that the parents of most PR siblings would be overseas and do not already own an HDB flat, whereas much fewer parents of citizen siblings would be abroad and do not own an HDB flat.

Even with this latest clarification from the HDB, on its website, the criteria to buy resale flats still do not state anything about unmarried citizen siblings, under age 35, being able to apply if their parents live abroad.

Leong Sze Hian

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Survivor calls out ministers who “deflect” from issue of police “mishandling” sexual assault cases

When debating a motion in parliament on empowering women on Tuesday (3…

Staying connected to customers in digital banking: The power of empathy

Michelle Huff, CMO at UserTesting shares how empathy is crucial for customer retention in digital banking. She points out that financial institutions should prioritize personalization, transparency, senior customer needs, understanding customer pain points, and balancing self-service with human interaction to provide better customer experiences.

【2020财政预算案】增加学前教育津贴至每年逾20亿元

政府将增加学前教育津贴增至每年逾20亿元。 副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰表示,在学前教育方面,为了能够让更多国人将孩子送到学前教育中心,今年起政府将增加学前教育津贴,从2018年10亿元增至每年逾20亿元。 王瑞杰透露,目前政府资助的学前教育中心学额占了所有学前教育中心学额额度五成,且预计将在2025年提升至八成。 此外,政府每年将投入多900万元,达5200万元在教育经济援助计划,因此也会用于加强对低收入家庭的援助,其获得教育部经济援助的高中生将每年享有的900元助学金额增至1000元,让国人能够负担得起教育费用,同时交通津贴与学校餐食津贴也会增加。 同时,政府也会调高工艺教育学院助学金,符合资格的低收入家庭学生除了可获得助学金之外,将可完全免付学费;来自中低收入家庭的学生也将每年获得多达200元现金的助学金。

“新加坡被颜色革命的人盯上?” 为何吴俊刚对非暴力逆权如此恐惧?

上周,耶鲁—国大学院临时取消一门名为《新加坡的异议与抵抗》的课程,院方给的给的理由是,课程“未批判性地接触多元观点”,课程建议的活动和选取讲员,也有损该校不把政党政治利益带入校园的承诺。 昨日,前资深报人暨前国会议员吴俊刚,也对于耶鲁-国大学院的这项决定,在《联合早报》专栏发表评述。 在这篇题为《新加坡不需要颜色革命》,吴俊刚显示介绍课程的背景,由本地剧作家亚菲言和课程经理Tan Yock Theng负责。 根据课纲内容,课程活动之一,包括观看独立制片人苏德祥制作“光谱行动”纪录片《1987解开阴谋》(1987: Untracing the Conspiracy)、有关香港抗争活动代表人物黄之锋的纪录片。课程也安排了学生与苏德祥对话。 同时,也邀请资深老报人巴吉尔(PN Balji)、历史工作者覃炳鑫、社运分子范国瀚、艺术家施兰(Seelan Palay)以及自由新闻工作者韩俐颖等人,与学生交流。…