By Tunku Abdul Aziz (for Mysinchew.com)

FOUR years ago, on 18 October 2006, I wrote an opinion piece from my 30th floor office in the UN Secretariat, New York, for the New Sunday Times. The title, Singapore is simply a neighbour too far, I thought fairly described my assessment of the state of our relations with neighbouring Singapore. It upset a great many Singaporeans; it also made many realise that “what’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.”

A Singaporean behaves too much like an insecure lover, forever seeking assurance that she is the fairest of them all and that she is much admired and loved. The insatiable craving for praise and adoration would, in normal circumstances, point to a serious flaw in the national character. This much I remember from the Child Psychology lectures I attended in college all those long years ago. How else can you explain their supercilious behaviour towards us, the Japanese and Indians, all falling into the category of “stupid?”

Singapore is not an unknown quantity to us in Malaysia. In a sense it is of us, but not part of us. Forget the so-called historical ties that are supposed to underpin our relations because they amount to nothing in practice.

To view them through rose-tinted spectacles as is our wont would distort even further a relationship that has never been known for its convergence of views on even the most pedestrian of issues. Rather, it has always had all the makings and attributes of a potentially protracted and acrimonious future.

Singapore has no time for sentiments; emotion is anathema to its national make-up. So, do not use that tack because it simply will not wash with it. Singapore is brutally clinical and rarely takes prisoners in any engagement with it.

Being small is not always easy, especially when you are trying to flex your muscles and punch above your weight. To be constantly reminded that you are nothing more than a little red dot on the face of the earth as President B.J. Habibi of Indonesia once did, somewhat insensitively, must touch some raw nerves, especially for a country that can justifiably claim a string of successes on so many fronts.

Now, even the Minister Mentor has doubts if his creation is really a country. For a “country” that has yet to establish an identity, Singapore is overbearingly obnoxious.

Read the rest of the article here.

The writer is a former Special Adviser to the United Nations Secretary General.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Hong Kong police denies allegations of collusion with triad following delayed response to violence on Sunday

Hong Kong Police chief admits that officers arrived 35 minutes late after…

夹娃娃机活捉螃蟹搞噱头? 防虐待动物协会直呼残忍

近年夹娃娃机如雨后春笋般出现在各地,其内容物从一开始的夹娃娃到各式各样的东西如电器用品等,而许多业者跟随这股风潮,将自家商品放入其中,吸引顾客。但近日却有一家海鲜餐馆业者为了吸引顾客眼球,竟将活生生螃蟹放入其中,任由顾客夹起,遭防止动物虐待协会(SPCA)批评残忍。 海鲜之家(House of Seafood)榜鹅店日前以夹娃娃机,将生螃蟹放入其中以每次5元让顾客自己活捉斯里兰卡螃蟹。消息一出也立即引起网民注意,纷纷斥责行为的残忍,并应好好对待自己的食物。 周三(23日)防止虐待动物协会于脸书上表态,直指行为的残忍,认为螃蟹是生物,并非玩具,因此呼吁民众不要参与这样残忍的活动 “我们对于这种为了人类娱乐而生的想法,以及对待动物手法感到相当惊讶与不安。” 防止虐待动物协会执行董事雅珀(Jaipal Singh Gill)表示。 他补充,应该立即停止这样的行为,而且已经向国家公园局辖下的动物与兽医事务组(Animal and Veterinary Service,简称AVS)通报,希望能够迅速采取行动。…

21 May 1987

Andrew Loh / On 21 May 1987, a group of social workers…

心脏衰竭无力工作 男子欲申请公积金维生被拒

拿不起超过五公斤的物品,外出四小时就会感到身体疲累,站了15分钟就会开始头晕。患有心脏衰竭,右心房只剩下37巴仙功能的五旬男子,感叹工作难找之余,更令人心寒的是,当他向中央公积金局申请领取公积金以支持日后的开销时,当局却以他不符合资格为由,拒绝其申请。 事件主人公,56岁的沈佳泉只有小六毕业程度,之前曾工作一段时间,也有3000新元收入,但是在2011年开始,他的身体健康状况出现了问题。 公积金局指条件不符合 根据《新明日报》报导,事主目前身体无力工作,只能靠着妻子养家糊口,还要妻子给零用钱,实在觉得不忍心,因此才想领出公积金,期望能减轻家中的负担。 只是,公积金却表示沈佳泉的情况“并不符合提款条件”,因此拒绝了他的申请,令后者感到求助无门,不能理解为什么他拥有的钱财却不能在需要时使用。 手术后无力维持长时间工作 他指出,在2011年,他开始翻覆发烧,有时体温甚至烧到40度,康复后就开始发现身体容易感到疲惫,走路或久站都会气喘吁吁。 他那时还不以为意,一直到一次在太太陪同下要过天桥去找中医检查时,在过天桥途中就差点因为喘不过气而昏厥,才惊觉身体状况应该出问题了。 当时中医就有建议沈佳泉去看西医,但他并不在意,一直到他有一次差点喘不过气来被紧急送院后,才发现心脏有问题。 他指出,当时医生指他的心脏出现衰竭现象,且不能提重物,否则心脏会痛。医生也劝他进行手术,以提升原本只剩下27巴仙功能的心脏到32巴仙。 经过手术,虽然心脏功能提升到了37巴仙,但他体力已不如前,而3000多元的工作因为三四个月就要去医院一次,以及身体的状况,就已经无法工作了。 他在手术的两年后,重新开始工作,也尝试了开私召车等兼职工作,但是因为心脏问题,也无法赚取过多收入。…