Community
The financial burden for families with autistic children (Part 1)
ASD refers to a spectrum of psychological conditions characterized by abnormalities in social interactions and communication, as well as severely restricted interests and highly repetitive behavior. ASD includes autism, Asperger syndrome, and atypical autism. Close to 30000 Singaporeans have varying degrees of autism.
by Jonathan Koh
Mrs Sng, 35, has three children. Her youngest son, JY, turning 3 this year, is diagnosed to be Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD).
“JY is fascinated by moving things such as the standing fan and the stove. And he will climb close to these objects to touch them, without fear of injury. It is extremely dangerous,” Mrs Sng says. She is a stay-at-home mother.
Early intervention in the window of opportunity
Experts believe that there is a window of opportunity in autistic children’s preschool years, ranging from age two to five. During this period, autistic children are best able to learn socially acceptable behaviors. The most cost-effective approach for the family is thus to focus on early intervention, not late rehabilitation.
This belief drives parents like Mrs Sng to send their children for early intervention therapies. Research shows that for early intervention to be successful, it has to take at least 35 to 40 training hours a week. This works out to around 6 hours a day.
JY is attending a government-run Early Intervention Program for Infants or Children (EIPIC). A check with MCYS shows that there are “12 government-funded Early Intervention Programme for Infants and Children (EIPIC) centres that cater to children from birth to six years old who have special needs.”
Gripes with government-run EIPIC
Another parent feels that some early intervention centers are not targeted to meet the needs of children diagnosed with ASD. One such parent, Mr Ong, says that the curriculum is not structured in a “comprehensive or targeted way to meet the needs of autistic children”. The centre which his son attends is “typically attended by children with varied conditions – e.g. Cerebral Palsy or Down Syndrome, which make it difficult to have customized programmes for autistic individuals,” he says.
According to Mr. Ong, while there are other early intervention centres that do have an ASD-specific programme, the cornerstone of such government-run centres is about teaching such children to be independent, which in his opinion is not enough. Some centres also bring children out to play, or hold outreach programmes with members of the public. He believes that this period of window of opportunity for autistic children is short and critical and should be better spent.
Going private – the huge financial costs
As such, Mr Ong enrols his 4-year old son Michael in private therapy.
Michael is attending private speech therapy (around $600 a month); private Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) therapy that focuses on reinforcing right behaviors (which cost $2000 per month); and normal childcare on some days. This is a huge financial burden on Mr. Ong who is the sole breadwinner of his family. He earns around $4000 per month. “As middle-income parents, we are just able to afford some therapies for our child. I have no idea if lower income parents are able to cope,” he says.
Government-run EIPIC centres, on the other hand, charge only $120 per month, after MCYS subsidies. With just 6 hours of intervention in EIPIC, parents are told to carry out the bulk of intervention themselves. However, most do not know how. “No one tells us what courses are suitable or where to get trained.” Mrs Sng says.
She knows of parents who are forced to give up their jobs to spend more time training their children or to be available to bring their kids for various therapies. The financial situation of a family becomes a critical issue overnight, with parents facing the extra costs incurred by having a special needs child coupled with the loss of an additional income.
Clutching at straws
Mrs Sng also pays for home therapy for her son JY. This costs $45 per hour.
Her main concern is that some of these home therapists are not MOH-accredited; – for instance, some of them are on the Filipino employment pass. However, many desperate parents usually still go ahead regardless of reliability, due to the scarcity of such trained personnel here in Singapore.
“It puts us in a vulnerable position as we could be wasting not just money but the precious time of our kids too,” Mrs Sng says, alluding to the limited window period.
She likens that to clutching at straws, and claims that there have been cases where parents have met unethical therapists. Also, other parents resort to unorthodox therapies like special diet or acupuncture, which are all not supported by MOH.
“After spending close to $10k in 5 months over JY’s home therapy, and seeing how the therapist does not attempt to stretch him but keeps doing the same things, I’m really feeling distressed now over the time and money wasted,” she says.
Community
Singapore performer impersonating Sivaji Ganesan dies after collapse during live show
Asokan S/O Muniyandy, a Singaporean performer famed for his impersonation of Indian actor Sivaji Ganesan, passed away on 12 October at the age of 60. Dubbed the “Singapore Sivaji,” he collapsed after a performance. His final rites will take place on 15 October at 5 pm.
SINGAPORE: Singaporean performer Asokan S/O Muniyandy, renowned for his impersonation of Tamil cinema legend Sivaji Ganesan, passed away on Saturday (12 Oct) at the age of 60.
Known as “Singapore Sivaji” for his uncanny resemblance to the iconic actor, Asokan was a regular performer at cultural events in Singapore and Malaysia.
He reportedly collapsed and died at the end of a live performance, leaving the audience in shock.
Videos circulating on social media show Asokan dancing moments before he suddenly collapsed face-first as the emcee spoke to the crowd.
The sudden incident left onlookers stunned.
Seithi Mediacorp reported that Asokan’s final rites will take place on Tuesday (15 Oct) at 5 p.m.
Animals
Controversy erupts as NParks sets traps for wild chickens following resident complaints
A video showing NParks contractors trapping wild chickens in Yio Chu Kang has sparked online controversy. Many netizens criticize the agency for targeting harmless chickens while ignoring more disruptive animals. They argue that chickens contribute to the local charm and should be preserved instead of culled, raising questions about the complaints received.
SINGAPORE: A video showing contractors hired by the National Parks Board (NParks) laying chicken traps has ignited controversy online.
The incident occurred in the Cactus estate, located in Yio Chu Kang.
The video, first uploaded on 9 October to the Facebook group Singapore Wildlife Sightings, shows two men in green vests kneeling on a grass patch and setting up what appeared to be traps for wild chickens.
According to the original post, the contractors were responding to complaints from local residents.
In response to media inquiries from MS News, Mr How Choon Beng, NParks’ Group Director of Wildlife Management, confirmed that both NParks and the Cheng San Grassroots Organisation had received numerous complaints about free-ranging chickens in the Cactus and Sunrise estates over the past year.
The complaints cited issues related to disturbances caused by the chickens, referred to as “dis-amenities.”
Mr How explained that NParks is currently conducting “population management measures” to address the growing number of chickens in the area.
He emphasized that NParks adopts a science- and community-based approach to managing animal populations, including free-ranging chickens.
These efforts include studying the birds’ population ecology, conducting biosurveillance programs, and implementing a variety of management strategies such as public education and habitat modification.
Mr How noted, “There is no one-size-fits-all management approach when it comes to addressing the multi-faceted issues related to free-ranging chickens.”
In addition, NParks collaborates with Grassroots Organisations to promote best practices in population control and engages residents by sharing tips on managing disturbances caused by the chickens, including the removal of eggs.
NParks also reminded the public to avoid feeding the chickens, as this contributes to their overpopulation and exacerbates the problem.
Netizens criticize NParks for trapping and culling wild chickens
Under an MS News Facebook post, many netizens expressed their opposition to the trapping and culling of wild chickens, arguing that they are harmless creatures.
Some users commented that they enjoy the presence of chickens, as they contribute to a “kampong” atmosphere in the neighbourhood.
One user mentioned that it is always nice to see chickens roaming around, helping to create that nostalgic vibe of home.
Another user shared their fondness for the sight of chickens, stating it feels reminiscent of the kampong days.
They suggested that instead of targeting chickens, NParks should focus on managing more disruptive animals like pigeons and otters, which can be a nuisance.
Several commenters questioned why NParks would catch harmless chickens while allowing other animals that pose more significant issues, like otters and pigeons, to remain unchecked.
One user criticized NParks for wasting time on chickens, emphasizing that they do not pose any threat to the public, unlike otters or wild boars that have attacked people.
Another commenter pointed out that chickens play a role in controlling harmful insects and pests, while otters contribute to the removal of pet fish in local ponds.
Others urged NParks to prioritize addressing the pressing issues posed by crows and pigeons rather than focusing on roaming chickens.
Many argued that NParks should aim to preserve nature by leaving harmless chickens alone and managing genuine pests instead.
A frustrated user criticized the authorities for succumbing to complaints rather than making decisions based on what is right.
They recalled a personal experience at Alexandra Village hawker centre, where they admired a group of wild chickens with a Malaysian worker, only to learn that authorities planned to cull them due to complaints.
One user questioned the nature of these complaints, urging NParks to clarify what is so problematic about having chickens in the neighbourhood.
They argued that these animals are harmless, self-sufficient, and do not bother humans.
As urban development continues to encroach on their natural habitats, many believe it is unjust to deny them the right to coexist with people in their own neighbourhoods.
-
Comments2 weeks ago
Netizens push back on Ho Ching’s 8-10 million population vision and call for more foreigners
-
Comments2 weeks ago
Dr Chee Soon Juan criticises Ho Ching’s vision for 8-10 million population
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
PM Lawrence Wong reaffirms government’s commitment to integrity after ex-minister Iswaran’s jail sentence
-
Singapore6 days ago
Media presence at Lee Wei Ling’s funeral contradicts family’s request for privacy
-
Comments5 days ago
LHL’s 15-minute visit to Dr Lee Wei Ling’s wake raises eyebrows among Singaporeans
-
Opinion5 days ago
Police say LHY and LSF free to return, but risk of arrest and passport seizure remains
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Property tycoon Ong Beng Seng to be charged for abetting graft and obstructing justice
-
Singapore3 days ago
PM Wong’s budget flight homecoming via Scoot makes headlines, but why?