Below is an excerpt of an article published in The Nation on the book “The Singapore Miracle – Myth and Reality” by Rodney King.

You can read the rest of the article here

_________________________________

“The Singapore Miracle – Myth and Reality” casts doubt on the city-state’s claims of cutting-edge efficiency, global competitiveness, economic freedom and transparency. Most Singaporeans are not as affluent as their government makes out, King says in his extensively documented, 500-page tome.

“Books about Singapore usually praise its achievements or criticise its authoritarian rule,” he writes. “But few ever probe its widely publicised claims that it is a brilliant success that other countries should follow.”

King argues that Singapore’s workforce productivity is often mediocre and well below that of the West and Asian economies such as Hong Kong.

“The country also displays endemic inefficiencies at both macro and micro-economic levels. The performance of the construction, financial and service sectors is second-rate, while Singapore Airlines does not deserve the top rankings it receives.”

Singapore, he says, has “a dependent and underdeveloped economy”. Multinational companies and state enterprises predominate, and the economy has “low entrepreneurial and innovative capacities and an under-educated workforce”.

The city-state’s supposed affluence is also largely a myth.

“About 30 per cent of the population still lives in poverty by Western living standards,” he says. And Singapore’s Housing Development Board, Central Provident Fund and state-run health schemes have severe shortcomings.

What Singapore has been good at, he says, is marketing itself.

The book is available at Amazon

____________________________________________

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MOH Group Director: No Singaporean will be denied medical care if they can't pay

A member of the public Tan Keong Boon wrote to ST Forum…

Desmond Lee: No proposal from Malaysian govt for third link to Singapore via Pulau Ubin

Minister for Social and Family Development Desmond Lee stated that Singapore has not…

“This proceeding itself scandalises the judiciary” – M Ravi

Defense counsel for Mr Alan Shadrake, Mr M Ravi, said in his…

因路线意见不同 司机乘客争执不断

透过第三方进行召车服务,有时会遇到司机说要“要跟我的路”,而乘客说“我还钱要听我的”的情况,但是网民认为其实大家要多体谅和互相尊重,更不应该故意刁难司机,“他们的收入在这困难时期已经变的更少了”。 网民Kenneth Chan昨早(9月28日)在脸书上帖文,分享发生在德士上的司机和乘客之“公说公有理,婆说婆有理”事件。 Kenneth指出,乘客当时通过德士公司或第三方的召车程序召车,虽然车费便宜,但是必须根据GPS导航系统所制定的路线,非常复杂。 帖文中,网民分析道,类似情况对乘客来说较为有利,因为车票便宜,可以最大限度地“驱使”司机,路途长。但是对司机而言,却是花时间和汽车燃料的。“看看这乘客如何欺负德士司机……就因为是他付款……他其实可以不用这样要求的,可以很好的询问是否能够解决问题。” Kenneth Chan表示,他了解司机的状况,他若通过第三方应用程序或召车应用程序接受载客,就必须遵守导航上的中央高速公路(CTE)路线。但是,德士司机在接到这名乘客之前,似乎刚刚经过中央高速公路时看见该处塞车或交通拥挤,因此决定在接到乘客后,因意见不合而发生争执。 乘客要求使用中央高速公路,完全不考虑司机的意见,就算司机已经尝试解释说该处塞车。“很显然的,乘客并没有将司机的困难放在眼里,对司机而言,时间就是金钱,而塞车将导致司机付出沉重的代价。” “如果是现场召车或用德士计程表计费,或许乘客就会同意司机所建议的,没有堵车的路线了。这能造就双赢局面,乘客提早抵达目的地,而司机也能够有时间赚取更多收入。” 网民同时批评道,似乎很多本地人都有这种态度,都是‘我’、‘我’、‘我的’的心理。而且对于短片中乘客的“我付钱,我有权拒绝”一席话,他认为司机在面对如此无礼对待时,也有权利取消订单,拒绝任何付款方式并请乘客下车。 他希望司机能够获得和一般人同样的对待和尊敬,更何况若他一天下来都面对类似的刁难客,心情怎么不会差?“最重要的是,他们需要注意路况,还要面对其他的无礼驾驶者和乘客、长时间待在车龙中,尤其是人有三急的时候,这些种种都是为了应付房租和车油费,收入也因这困难时期而变得更少。” 他坦承难以责怪这些脾气暴躁的司机,因为他们都受困于这些烦躁的框架中。“他们之中,有些也是很友善的人士,甚至是很好的谈话对象。”…