On the 26th of April, 2009 there was supposed to be a Central Executive Committee meeting at 11 pm and on the Attendance List were ten names of CEC members.

They were Ng Teck Siong (Chairman), G Prabhakaran (Vice-Chairman), Jeremy Lim (member), Mohd Affendy B Abdul Rahim (member), Kenneth Jeyaretnam (member), Quek Teow Chuan (member), Balraj Naidu (member), Edmund Ng (member) and Abdul Rahim B. Osman Arbo (member).

Abdul Rahim B. Osman Arbo and Mohd. Affendy B Abdul Rahim were not present on that day. Only G Prabhakaran, Jeremy Lim, Balraj Naidu, Edmund Ng and I had signed the attendance list to register our presence for the CEC meeting. The rest including Kenneth Jeyaretnam, did not sign the list.

What is more important to note is that, even if you counted the CEC members who did not sign the attendance list, there were only 8 CEC members present on that day; five officially and three unofficially.  But certainly not 9, as claimed by Kenneth.

At the meeting, two of the members who did not sign the attendance list, Kenneth and James Teo submitted their resignation to me.

But these letters were snatched from my hand by Balraj Naidu (the man who was later extradited to the United States of America on two terrorism related charges).

Those that did not sign the attendance list, misbehaved, refused to take their seats and banged the door before they left the meeting. They came back to the meeting a little later but left again soon after, but came back in again, each time speaking in raised voices.

At some point in this mayhem, James Teo who was only a member in the CEC called in a locksmith to change the locks to our office, without my information nor instruction.

Sensing that there is no way a proper CEC meeting can proceed under such circumstances, I exercised my rights as Chairman, subjected to the Party constitution and called off the CEC meeting.

The fact remains that I was still the chairman of the party on 26th April 2009 and that only the meeting I called will be effective on that day.

I resigned from the Party on the 27th of April, 2009, but was surprised when a minutes of the April 26, 2009 CEC meeting surfaced. My signature was conspicuously absent from it.

The truth remains that in the rush to take-over the Party’s helm, the CEC meeting where Kenneth was ‘elected’ as secretary-general was not held in accordance to the party constitution.

Is that the reason why Kenneth wanting the episodes of that day to come to a quick end, refused to answer any questions about it?

I am now forced to lay bare the happenings of that day as I have to defend not only my reputation and credibility, but also the credibility and honesty of the other members who left the Party with me.

And even if I do not bring it up now, truth of such nature will always be revealed.

I went through a painful process even writing that letter of resignation because I love the Party.

Mr J B Jeyaretnam (JBJ), G Prahbakaran and I were the three main pioneers of the Party.  Since, the demise of JBJ, it became G Prahbakaran and my responsibility to ‘rope-in’ honest and capable people into the Party.

We wanted to groom these people as leaders and prepare them for the rigours of working the ground and the General Elections. With the right guidance, we felt they would one day even be able to form the next government – a government which is based on the rule of law and not on the rule of man.

We took exceptional care in searching and recruiting such men and women of calibre.

The unconstitutional coup within the Party unfortunately happened when these few good people we approached were seriously considering joining the Party.

By: Ng Teck Siong

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SMRT sends emails to staff, defending its decision to dismiss two staff involved in fatal accident on 22 March

Defending the decision it made towards the dismissal of its 2 employees,…

租房不符安全距离需搬离 客工却面对租金涨两难处境

我国过去几周内确诊病例暴增,其中大部分的感染患者皆为客工。为抑制病毒持续传染,政府也于4月7日开始实施阻断措施(Circuit Breaker),然而在阻断措施实施期间,疫情仍未见好转,近日政府再度宣布延长阻断措施直至6月1日。 截至14日,我国累计确诊达2万6098例,其中共有2万3758人皆为客工,对此人力部也加强了客工宿舍的措施,除了为客工设立临时客工专用宿舍与工厂改建宿舍,以确保社交距离能够有效实施。而客工宿舍的条件也称是卫生条件良好的。 然而,针对仍住宿在外的客工而言,有者却不那么幸运,尤其是住在店屋的客工。 新加坡客工组织情义之家(HOME)的个案管理经理Luke Tan表示,一些客工被迫从他们的居住地搬走,当局在检查后发现他们的房间内过于拥挤,不符合条例。 “许多客工已搬离,因为房间被发现太拥挤。” 房东还要加租金 他表示,尽管是为了安全着想,但此举也让许多客工被迫露宿街头。更糟糕的是,有房东还试图起租金,使得客工的处境举步维艰。 此外,向来关注客工课题的维权人士柯基拉(Kokila Annamalai)也为客工的不公平的对待打抱不平。她表示,这也显示客工面临不公平对待的铁证,应同时也必须设法安置客工。 她认为,若更多客工无家可归,致使他们更易感染冠状病毒19,同时调高房租更促使他们背负更多的压力。…

Diluted Justice – protection and redress for trafficked fishermen in Asia

In December 2012, a migrant workers’ rights NGO Transient Workers Count Too…

申请法援挑战政府假消息裁定 人权律师质疑可行度

政府将在下月于国会寻求通过《防止网络假消息和网络操纵法案》。然而该法被指赋予部长过多的权力、制衡机制不足,也引起公民社会的质疑和忧虑。 在上周四(4月3日)律政部兼卫生部高级政务部长唐振辉出席管理大学对话会。针对一名与会者质疑若假消息来自政府又如何处置,对此他打包票指出,政府并不会凌驾于法律体系之外,完全不受到监督。 反假消息法也被指透过法律刑责,来制造寒蝉效应,造成民众因担忧招惹官司而被高昂诉讼费缠身,而不敢再批评政府政策。 对于官司费的担忧,唐振辉认为,目前国内已有充足的经济和法律援助供有需要者申请,对部长的更正指示作出上诉。 不过,人权律师M拉维就在脸书发文,质疑上述申请法律援助来上诉的实际可行性。 “老实说,我不曾听闻有人申请法律援助来挑战政府的决定。就算可以,还有大部分人都不符合申请法律援助条件,没办法这么做。” 在新起草的防假消息法案下,部长若判断某消息为假消息并可能威胁公共利益,就可下达指示要求更正或撤下。 然而,令拉维感到不安的是,假设政府本身,涉及借用官方媒体散播假消息,有关法案却没有明确途径让公民挑战政府。在该法案第61条文下,部长还能发出“免死金牌”给特定人物或机构,比如说,可以发出指示,豁免某部门或官方媒体,不受法案的对付。 他质疑,普通老百姓怎么可能负担得起动辄至少八万元的诉讼费,到高庭去挑战部长对假新闻的裁定有误。 去年担任蓄意散播假消息特选委员会主席的张有福曾指出,若对政府的裁定有不满,应有足够的管道,且上诉过程不会太繁琐。 他在昨日也接受《联合早报》采访,认为尽管新法案赋予部长权利,迅速采取措施以维护国家利益,但高庭可对其决定进行审核,而不是由政府全权定夺。 他同意,应允许不满者尽快做出申诉,而不是让他们耗费数年和上千元庭费来打官司。“既然部长有权迅速介入,要求个人或网络平台更正或撤下信息,那另一方上诉时也理应获得加速审理,以确保公平。”…