Ravi Philemon

The arrests began in the early hours of the 21st of May 1987. Within a span of a few hours, 16 men and women, most of whom were social workers, dramatists, Roman Catholic Church welfare workers and lawyers, were arrested by the Internal Security Department for being part of a ‘Marxist Conspiracy’. The government then said that the conspirators had links with Filipino leftists and proponents of ”liberation theology,” as well as with European Marxists and Sri Lankan separatists. The detainees were then accused of trying to use Roman Catholic, student and other groups to build a legal front as a cover for political sabotage.

The ‘threat’ was so real that in 1988, then Prime Minister designate Mr. Goh Chok Tong addressing a conference of the National Trade Union Conference and stressing that political stability was an essential ingredient for wage increases; pronounced that should the political conspiracy have succeeded, “you can kiss your wage increases for this year goodbye”.

But how real was the ‘threat’? For merely five weeks after the initial arrests, the Foreign Minister, Mr. S Rajaratnam complained that over 200 organisations from around the world had sent protest letters to the government indicating that they do not believe there is an internal Communist threat in Singapore.

A Statement from Lawyers Rights Watch Canada states that some of the ‘conspirators’ did not even know each other prior to the arrest. The only opposition Member of Parliament at that time, Mr. Chiam See Tong, called them “innocent young idealists.” And even the then Home Affairs Minister, Mr. Shanmugam Jayakumar who said that “critics abroad, if you want to understand the action, you must also understand Singapore’s unique circumstance and problems”, admitted that the detainees were mere novices.

If the ‘conspirators’ were mere novices, what was the real reason for the arrest and subsequent detention without trial for these ‘Marxists’?

The International Commission of Jurists, who continually called the then Singapore government “to prove this alleged ‘conspiracy’ in open court, and give those detained a fair trial”, deduced in an investigative report that the real motive for the arrests and subsequent detention without trial of the ‘conspirators’ is to quash internal opposition and criticism of the Singapore government, not to protect the security and welfare of Singapore society against a Marxist conspiracy.

Whatever the real reason, the arrests and detention without trial of the ‘Marxist Conspirators’ repressed an entire generation of young Singaporeans from involvement in any activity that could be termed “political”.

“Repression, Sir is a habit that grows. I am told it is like making love-it is always easier the second time! The first time there may be pangs of conscience, a sense of guilt. But once embarked on this course with constant repetition you get more and more brazen in the attack. All you have to do is to dissolve organizations and societies and banish and detain the key political workers in these societies. Then miraculously everything is tranquil on the surface. Then an intimidated press and the government-controlled radio together can regularly sing your praises, and slowly and steadily the people are made to forget the evil things that have already been done, or if these things are referred to again they’re conveniently distorted and distorted with impunity, because there will be no opposition to contradict.”

(Mr. Lee Kuan Yew as an opposition PAP member speaking to David Marshall, Singapore Legislative Assembly, Debates, 4 October, 1956)
—-

Read also:

Operation Spectrum – 22 years later

Remember May 21st

Passion for activism extinguished… but not for long

May 1987 – A conspiracy un-proved

TOC Exclusive: Teo Soh Lung – In her own words (Part One)

The Marxist Conspiracy – Not forgetting the evil things that have already been done (Ravi Philemon)

——-

Also:

“Marxist Conspiracy” revisited

——

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SMRT fined S$400,000 for safety lapses in Pasir Ris accident

Singapore Mass Rapid Transit (SMRT) Trains was fined S$400,000 on Tuesday (28…

泰国军政府取消政治禁令 明年二月举行大选

泰国军政府于今日取消政治活动禁令,选举委员会宣布在明年2月24日,举行推迟已久的全国大选。 全国维持和平秩序委员会(NCPO),日前与该国75政党代表开会,会议由首相巴育主持,商谈在明年明年举行选举。 根据《曼谷邮报》报导,竞选活动预计将在明年1月2日开始。 自2014年掌权以来,泰国军政府以需在大示威后恢复秩序为由,实施多项管制,管制直到今年九月才部分解禁,允许政党活动、招募党员等,可是仍禁止举行政治集会、进行政治筹款和进行宣传造势等。。 而今,随着禁令解除,政党可自由活动、参与竞选和宣传政策。 估计来届选举,仍会是支持前首相他信的”红衫军“以及军方和保皇派政党之间的对决。 他信阵营自2001年以来就多次胜选,但他信和妹妹英叻的政权,也分别在2006年和2014年被推翻。 2013年11月,反对党支持者聚集曼谷,抗议前首相英叻和执政党为泰党。 2014年五月,泰国宪法法院八名法官指控英叻滥权,后者被迫下台,结束两年九个月的首相生涯。 去年,泰国最高法院审理英叻的渎职案,英叻在审讯期间潜逃出国。军政府则寻求将她从英国引渡归国。  

“恐有损总理形象” 《砂拉越报告》非议总理律师团对梁实轩穷追猛打

得理不饶人?早前,时评人梁实轩因误传一篇假新闻惹祸,但即使已经撤下文章并作出道歉,总理的律师团队仍坚决对后者提告,此举亦迎来国际爆料网站《砂拉越报告》的非议。 梁实轩是在11月初,分享了誌期11月5日的State Times Review(STR)文章,标题为《李显龙成为一马公司弊案主要调查对象》。 有关文章指《砂拉越报告》主编克莱尔,针对一马弊案接受访谈,但较后《砂》已澄清有关文章内容不实,要求STR纠正。 故此,梁实轩本身也是假新闻的受害人,在不知情情况下误传失实报导。梁实轩也收到资讯与媒体发展局(IMDA)来函,要求他在在六小时内撤下有关文章,梁实轩也照做无误,并作出道歉。 《砂拉越报告》访问了梁实轩,后者告诉《砂》,他自愿删除有关失实贴文,也承认文章内容不实,但即使这么做,还是被总理律师团队诉诸法律行动,令他感到惊讶。 《砂》形容,如今梁实轩的处境如处在夹缝中进退维谷,无论庭外和解或自我辩护,对他都不利,总理的律师团队似乎要索讨巨额赔偿。 何以要对已道歉的普通老百姓穷追猛打? 对此,《砂》质疑既然资媒局已经对梁实轩采取严厉行动,总理的律师团队还要对这名普通新加坡百姓,采取强硬手段对付? 《砂》质问,梁实轩和他人一样,被假新闻误导,也为此删除贴文并道歉,但何以他还是成了“新加坡最有权势者”的眼中钉,被施以“毁灭性的报复”。 不利总理在民间形象…