TOC would like to specially thank Ms Lynn Lee for allowing us to publish the following story.

Lynn Lee / Dhaka, Bangladesh

Odud Sayed Ahammed was a hopeful man. So hopeful, he gave his one piece of land to his neighbour, so the neighbour could go find him a job in Singapore. A year passed, and there was no job. The neighbour said, “It’s getting more expensive to secure work in Singapore. Give me another 100,000 takas, and I’ll be able to do something.”

Odud thought hard about it. His neighbour had told him stories about Singapore – that magical place where you could make up to 50,000 takas in a single month. With a bit of luck, and plenty of hard work, Odud thought he’d be able to earn enough money to cover his investment and eventually buy back that piece of land. So he took out a loan for 100,000 takas and handed the cash to his neighbour.

This time, the neighbour made good on his promise. Odud left for Singapore early last year. Several weeks later, he was sent home to his wife and kids – in a coffin. His death certificate says he had collapsed behind a bus-stop along Boon Lay Way. Cause of death: pneumonia. A friend who was with him has a slightly different story. He says Odud died of diarrhoea.

This is Odud’s wife, Maloti. She could barely stop crying long enough to tell us her story. She had said goodbye to her husband, fully expecting him to come home a rich man. He’s dead. She’s destitute. Her two older kids live in an orphanage. Odud’s Singaporean employer didn’t bother with an explanation, let alone any compensation.

This is Odud’s grave. It lies just a short distance from the land he gave away. Maloti cries every time she sees it. 

Was Odud’s death preventable? No one knows. Odud worked for a company called Ree Engineering. Were they negligent? We do not know. Do they owe Maloti some kind of an explanation, if not compensation? Definitely.

What did they do instead? They put Odud’s body in a box, and shipped it back to his family, along with an embalming certificate, a death certificate and a document from the National Environment Agency with the heading:

“PERMISSION TO EXPORT A COFFIN CONTAINING A CORPSE.”

Because you know, Singaporean employers are world class, that way. No condolence note. No explanations. Nothing.

Nothing to show for a man, whose biggest mistake, was to hope.

——-

If you would like to make a donation to the family of Odud, please contact TWC2. The cheque should be made out to “Transient Workers Count Too” and indicate at the back of the cheque that it is for the family of Odud.

——-

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Partial closure of Marina South Pier for emergency preparedness exercise

Marina South Pier will be partially closed to the public between 0900hrs…

Vivian Balakrishnan meets M’sian Foreign Minister at S’pore-Johor Causeway

Minister of Foreign Affairs Vivian Balakrishnan met Malaysian Foreign Minister Hishammuddin Hussein…

公民蔡秀菱非议 当年本地中文报指“还我公积金”游行队伍有意吓唬小孩

回溯2016年6月,新加坡民运人士、90后博客韩慧慧,与两名参与“还我公积金”集会的公民被指控公共滋扰罪等成,韩慧慧被罚款3100新元。 新加坡初级法院向24岁的韩慧慧作出宣判,她被指2014年9月27日在芳林公园举行的”还我们公积金”集会滋扰基督教青年会活动,并且非法集会罪成。 当时,韩慧慧向《自由亚洲电台》表示,她是第一次因集会被控告及判罚款,按照新加坡法例,罚款超过2千元,将没法参加国会大选,因此她要提出上诉,希望罚款少于2千元,不想被剥夺参政权利。 她被控两项罪名,因为当局视她为主办人,指参加者看了她的脸书及博客才出席,集会期间,她是主要的演讲者。 她指出,2013年新加坡政府控告她诽谤,因为她质疑教育政策,自始之后,她发现政府政策有问题,每月在芳林公园举办集会讨论各项议题。2014年9月27日当天讨论退休政策﹐集会约6千人,期间一基督教团体在公园进行活动,并邀请劳动部长出席,韩慧慧认为,可能因为集会讨论退休政策,触怒官员,其后约30人被警方问话,六人被告上法庭。 公园局何以批准两个活动同时进行? 六人中其中一位也被指控公共滋扰罪的公民蔡秀菱,接受本社采访,忆述当时事件。她非议当初国家公园局的安排,怎么能容许两个活动同时在同一天同一场地进行?当局大可建议韩慧慧把活动改期,不让两个活动同时进行。 而公园局和警方当时发表联合文告,指由于预计两场同时举行的活动将吸引不少人,公园局决定为活动划出不同的场地。然而,当公园局与警方人员昨午3时许到场要求集会主办方、学生博客韩慧慧(22岁)使用有关当局分配好的草坪时,对方却不愿合作。 而媒体也打出标题《芳林公园两活动撞期 示威集会“踩过界” 儿童与表演者受惊吓》,志在非议游行队伍行为,而执政党领袖则乘机群起攻击,表示对集会者行为失望、不尊重现场年长者和没顾虑到特殊儿童需求等。 然而,此事件反而展示了当时公园局欠缺敏感度,如果当初事先做好沟通安排,根本不会造成任何不愉快事件,当然,包括蔡秀菱等参与集会者也不会被牵累。…