Uniquely Singapore

Leong Sze Hian

With headlines in our local papers screaming “S’poreans in line for $3b payouts” (TODAY, April 15), “$3b payout over the next six months” (Straits Times), “2.4m S’poreans to get $3b in benefits this year” (Straits Times), one would be hard pressed to find anything amiss.

The Ministry of Finance’s (MOF) press release that some 2.4 million Singaporeans stand to get $3 billion in benefits this year, to help them cope with the rising cost of living, is laudable.

Until you sieve through the $3 billion help package itself.

Skewed examples in MOF’s press release

In its press release, the MOF says:

“For example, a family of three living in a three-room HDB flat could receive benefits of about $5,000, which is about six times the estimated increase in their cost of living (Annex A), and a family of five living in a 5-room HDB flat will get about $4,900 – about 2.5 times the estimated increase in their living costs (Annex B)”.

The above two examples given may be skewed towards higher benefits, because they both have retirees and older low-income household members, who receive relatively higher benefits and the Workfare Income Supplement (WIS) than the average household.

If we take for example, a typical family of a couple with two children, and household income of say $4,000 ($2,000 each working member), the direct cash benefits would be $1,100 ($700 Growth Dividends and $400 GST Credits).

Thus, the benefits may not be 2.5 times the estimated increase in living costs in 2008, but only 0.56 times ($1,100 divided by $4,912 (Annex B) divided by 2.5).

What percentage of households has a combination of both retirees and older low-income workers in the same household? This may probably be the exception, rather than the norm. Thus, the examples given by MOF are not terribly accurate or representative of households.

Offsetting inflation?

Further, despite claims by the government that the handouts will help combat inflation, this may not be completely true.

For example:

Medisave top-ups which can only be used in the future when one is hospitalised. Also, MediShield premiums will be increased this year. According to the Straits Times, “basic MediShield insurance are set to increase – by about $120 for most people… They will go up for everyone, with older policy-holders bearing higher increases, and younger ones most likely paying just a few dollars more.” In another ST report, “For older people who are likely to require more hospital care, the premium is set to increase by less than $40 a month. Their current premiums range from $600-$705 a year. The change will push it to more than $1,000 a year for them.”

The Post-Secondary Education Account (PSEA) can only be used when children enter university. How many households have children that enter universities annually? (Universities have also announced, in February 2008, an increase in tuition fees by between 4 per cent to 20 per cent – Straits Times.)

The Property Tax Rebate may be negated by the increase in property tax for all HDB flats from 1 January 2008

The U-Save Rebate may be eroded by increased utility tariffs. (Channel NewsAsia)

The S & CC Rebate may be offset by the previous years’ increases.

The Income Tax Rebates may not benefit the lower and middle-income, as over 60 per cent of Singaporeans do not pay income tax.

By the way, The PAP Community Foundation (PCF) has just announced that the fees at its kindergartens will increase by up to 100 per cent in July. (“Sharp hike in kindergarten fees”, Today, Apr 25).

It is important to note that the GST Credits are meant to offset the GST increase last year, and is not a new or extra measure to cope with the 26-year high inflation.

In the example given of a family of three living in a 3-room flat, with two retirees and a son earning $1,000 a month (Annex A), even after adding the direct cash benefits, the per capita household income would still be only about $449 (see below [1]), which is still below the criteria of $500 which is generally used to define a needy family in Singapore.

I feel that it may not be very appropriate to describe the so-called “benefits” as “six times the increase in their cost of living”.

Medisave top-up keeping step with healthcare inflation?

As to the claim of giving about 60,000 elderly an extra $100 top-up to their Medisave in September (“Over 80s to get extra $100 Medisave top-up”, ST, Apr 18), the total one-time ad-hoc top-up amount is only enough to pay for about one to one and a half years of the premium increase.

Remember that, according to news reports, Singaporeans aged 81-85 will need to pay between $30 and $40 more a month in premiums – or up to $480 more a year.

What’s the point of ad-hoc top-ups, when medical costs and premiums keep rising? How can the Medisave top-up be included as “benefits to help Singaporeans cope with inflation”?

To facilitate analysis and policy review of the impact of the benefits package, I would like to suggest that a breakdown of the different amounts for each benefit category for different households by income be made available to the public.

Raising wages not an option, depending on govt handouts is?

So, what else can be done to help Singaporeans cope with another 26-year high inflation of 6.7 per cent in March 2008? Raising wages?

Well, according to the acting Minister of Manpower, Gan Kim Yong:

“Raising wages to address the issue of rising costs may be an enticing option but that is not the right solution… He said adjusting wages upwards to meet rising prices would only result in a “price-wage spiral” and Singaporeans should look at the bigger picture.” (Channel NewsAsia)

It would thus seem that Singaporeans will have to regularly and constantly depend on the government for handouts in order to ‘fight’ inflation. Yet, such ad hoc top-ups will only be given “provided we have the surpluses in the budget”, according to Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong. (Channel NewsAsia)

Perhaps the more important – and puzzling – question is: Why have Singaporeans, with one of the highest savings rates in the world, become so dependant on government handouts to even just get by?

One shudders to think what would happen to the poorer Singaporeans if there were no “budget surpluses”.

Click on pictures to enlarge.

Special thanks to Grace Toh.

Additional contribution from Andrew Loh.

———————-

[1] $4,150 Growth Dividends + GST Credits + WIS plus $12,000 income, divided by 12 months divided by 3 persons.

Read also: The Relentless Rising Cost Of Living.

————————-

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

RE-ORGANISATION OF WORKERS’ PARTY CEC

Press Release/ The Workers’ Party (WP) held its first Central Executive Council…

Yale-NUS College student is all praise for renowned Singapore historian Dr Hong Lysa for her years of “invaluable contributions” in Singapore’s past

On Tuesday (10 September), NUS-Yale sophomore Faris Joraimi took to his Facebook…

Pwee Foundation kick-starts pilot program with Boys’ Town

By Terry Xu The Pwee Foundation has helped kick-start Boys’ Town WRAP (Work Readiness Attachment Program),…

陆续有学员怒斥遭一教练非礼! 瑜伽教室急灭火

本地瑜伽教室Trust Yoga爆出学生遭非礼丑闻,涉及一名瑜伽教练。虽然瑜伽教室尽快站出来“灭火”,甚至指涉案教练已寻求法律途径解决,但是在8月26日,再次有网民分享被非礼经过,甚至爆出涉案教练,还指教室管理层的处理方式非常让人不满。 自本月初有学生做出指控后,陆续有人挺身而出,分享他们在该瑜伽教室经历过的性侵事件。 瑜伽教室回应有关揭秘事件时表示,当局会根据学生的反馈和要求,跟新中心内的安全系统和标准作业程序。 一受害者于7月31日在推特上发帖,细说她于7月11日在Trust Yoga瑜伽教室上课时,遭涉案教官打了她的左臀部,抚摸她的私处和胯下约三秒。她当时正在倒立,即在进行一种将心脏高于头部的瑜伽动作时,遭到该教官如此对待。 据称,她事后曾向工作人员投诉,然而却被告知该教官并非首次这么做。而受害者的推特账户在之后,就转为仅供私人参阅。 受害者表示,她和父亲于12日回到瑜伽教室,和教师经营者商讨。但是,经营者表示首次听闻有关事件,并且会采取严厉行动。 惟,在8月2日,受害者在Instagram限时动态中分享到,涉案教练仍然被安排在8月3日至9日的一周瑜伽课程中。 瑜伽教室增设CCTV Trust Yoga瑜伽教室于8月3日在脸书发声明,表示当局已知晓有关的非礼案指控,涉案教官也同意在当局进行内部调查期间停工休假。…