This is an extract from the blog, DailyKos.

Meet some of the citizen reporters of OhmyNews, a South Korean venture that in 2000 became the first online newspaper in the world to accept, edit, and publish articles from its readers.

It was established by Oh Yeon Ho, who has earned his credibility in the student pro-democracy movement of the 1980s, including having served a prison term for his activities.

OhmyNews was instrumental in bringing down the previous South Korean president in 2002, and the election of current President Roh Moo Hyun. Not only did OhmyNews garner the first media interview from new President Roh, but the president himself addressed the opening of the conference:

“The media has to change if our society is to advance. The most powerful force that raises the standards of the media is no other than the participation of alert citizens.

The standards of the media and quality of its products can improve when more citizens participate in the production and distribution stages and use their responsible criticism to act as a check against the possibility of the media morphing into a political power.

Moreover, solidarity between the media organizations that are actively participated in by citizens will greatly contribute to advancing democracy globally.”

 To read the full article, click here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

预计需2至3周完成检讨巴蒂案 尚穆根下月才发表部长声明

有鉴于警方和总检察署预计需二至三周时间,完成检讨前女佣巴蒂案,内政部长兼律政部长尚穆根也表示,将在11月才在国会针对此事发表部长声明。 尚穆根是在今日(2日)告知媒体,在警方和总检察署完成检讨后,才会在国会对此发表部长声明。他在上月16日表示,多名议员将在国会复会时,针对前女佣案件提问,为此他也准备提供部长声明回应。 有鉴于此,工人党主席、阿裕尼集选区议员林瑞莲,也暂时不会再申请休会动议,将待部长声明和合适的期间参与辩论。 工人党认为,尽管内部检讨仍在进行,对于巴蒂案件反映刑事司法制度更广泛的问题,有必要采取适当的措施去回应相关缺失。 前女佣巴蒂,被前樟宜机场集团主席廖文良一家指控偷窃,幸在本月初获高庭法官翻案,沉冤得雪。巴蒂一案近两周来引起国人议论,并关注女佣在整个审讯中处于弱势的地位。高庭法官陈成安判决中,更形容廖家父子报警可能存在“不当意图”,被告有充分理由投诉人力部,而廖家“先下手为强”将他开除。 高庭法官陈成安,在判决中也点出所谓“赃物”移交警局过程存在疑点。包括廖家声称开箱检查女佣留下的三大箱子,并报警后,警方未立即取走证物。由于高庭法官的判词,也针对警方的调查工作,这也致使警方需出面回应此事,表示将展开调查。 尽管早前巴蒂有意对两名主控官发起纪律研讯,惟在本周二却又提呈撤诉的申请。 巴蒂代表律师阿尼尔(Anil Balchandani),今午(10月1日)在法庭告知大法官梅达顺,过去一个月来发生的事件,令巴蒂负荷不来,再者被官司缠身四年,巴蒂希望能早日返乡,这是巴蒂有意撤诉的原因之一。 不过,巴蒂仍坚信,两名副检察司(Deputy Public Prosecutor),仍需要针对她的指控作出交代。…

Event report – “Post-Elections: Perspectives and An Analysis” forum on 15 May 2011

The following is an excerpt of an article posted on MARUAH.org. One…

国会的角色 既是辩论最可行方案

盛港候任议员林志蔚直言,国会的角色就是去辩论最可行的政策方案。“理想情况下,国会议员选择支持或反对某政策,将选区选民和全国的利益作整体考量。” 政策依据整体的优劣,固然“魔鬼藏在细节里”,制定政策者某种程度上该去盘点这些细节,但也要充分理解较广泛的考量因素,如对预算财案的潜在影响、整体社会经济的影响等。 林志蔚曾在世界银行工作七年,也曾参与不同经济体(不管是民主或较不民主政体)的政策制定,对于民主政策决策有感而发,在脸书表达个人看法。 拥有美国哈佛大学历史学硕士、美国加利福尼亚大学圣克鲁兹分校国际经济学、哲学博士资历,目前也是ESSEC商学院经济学副教授。 林志蔚也在近期获委新加坡经济学会公布最新理事会成员。坊间期许更多在野党议员入国会, 能激起更诚挚的辩论,但如果国会没有足够的在野党声音,这样的辩论根本不会出现。 他指出,由大多数人(或大多数代议士)制定的决策(不论好坏)都会在全民之间落实,在此前必然需经过一番辩论,但若通过成为法律,全民只能遵守。而如果法律仅是针对特定群体,亦是缺乏民主和歧视性的,当然针对性的法律,例如妇女产假、最低薪金制等则属例外。 不过决策者需谨慎非自愿排斥或包容的风险,带来偏驳或差别待遇的看法,有别于原子或化学,若人们知道政策怎么对待他们,人是会改变他们的态度的。 国会的角色,正是去辩论最可行的方案;较精细的细节可以交给有能力且非政治性的官僚,将笼统的转化为更具体和实用的事物。在好些民主政体,通常都是公共体系的高层随着换政府更迭。 林志蔚也提醒,评估的黄金标准固然是做实验,但是要这么去对国家政策做实验显然不切实际,那就反倒把人们都当成白老鼠了。所幸统计科学之进步,使得人们可以用较不侵害权益的方式来进行评估。 “现代化的公共服务,理应有擅长此法的专业人士服务。理想上还应进行独立的评鉴(例如学术机构),而这亦需要出于公共利益的数据共享。” 那么政策有没有效的评估,就反映给国会,来决定有关政策是否还值得进行下去,或哪些部分可能失败。

Majority of HDB owners expected to pay around S$38 and S$400 more in 2024 for property tax after annual value revision

SINGAPORE — Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) is revising the Annual…