The Government held a motion in Parliament on Monday to congratulate Joseph Schooling on the Olympic gold medal he won on 13 August in the 100m butterfly final at the Rio Olympics 2016.

Parliament Secretary, Ministry of Culture, Community, and Youth Baey Yam Keng, MP Holland Bukit Timah GRC Christopher de Souza, MP for Aljunied GRC Sylvia Lim, and the President of Singapore National Olympic Council Tan Chuan Jin gave words of felicitation to Joseph Schooling and his family, Colin and May Schooling.

Ms Sylvia Lim said that “the winning, which may seem effortless to us, was the result of a lifetime of discipline, training, and sacrifice. However, Joseph parents’ took a big part of his winning for giving him the security to enable him to pursue his dreams, supported his passion for the sport, and tirelessly fought for his cause. They did not take the easy course of asking him to abandon his passion and buckle down to more conventional paths of success.”

Mr Baey said he was glad that the spexScholarship and Race to Rio programme have helped Joseph and the rest of the Olympians fly the country’s flag.

He also stated that in a few weeks the largest-ever Paralympics contingent, 12 athletes across 6 sports, will be sent to Rio.

Mr Christopher said that Singaporeans of all races, Chinese, Malays, Indians, and others, were cheering to see his winning and were proud to see the Singaporean flag on Joseph’s cap.

However, netizens lambasted the motion held by the government. Most of them criticised the act and said that it was only riding on Schooling’s victory.

Schooling’s father had spent more than S$1 million of his own money for his son to come to this stage in his sporting career. However, the government only came in to help just before the “finishing line”, while Baey in his speech emphasized on how the SpexScholarship awarded to Schooling in 2013 helped him to further his success.

Bear in mind that the motion does not hint in any way that efforts to support sporting individuals will be in improved.

The motion was shown live on Channel News Asia.

Min Zheng wrote, “hello CNA can do better editing or not? This is supposed to be a proud moment for the Schooling family and you didn’t even show them in the end but focused on all the MPs only?”

Here are some of the comments written by netizens criticizing the action by Parliament:

  • Chris Loo wrote, “Of course! They are riding on his achievements and claim credit if not for them to defer pls la it’s his Mother who fight relentlessly for issac not the Mindef!”
  • Robert Tan said that Schooling has proved to the Govt and its leaders that locally bred Sporeans can bring glory to SG n not necessary FTs. It is a good gesture to acknowledge his achievement publicly in parliament but pls don’t claim credit.
  • “Standing Ovation from a bunch of ministers that doesn’t know anything about sports and athleticism, doesn’t believe in Sports and probably still don’t,” wrote Bernard Sim.
  • Danson Ong said, “Best actors and actress not from Mediacorp Leh! But the whole parliament is the best actors and actress!! Haha Wayang kings and queens! Hahh”
  • “Ya ya but where were the govt when Joseph was working hard on his mission to be the Gold medalist? He look so tired, let him go home & have his much deserve rest. CONGRATULATIONS JOSEPH SCHOOLING. The govt should exempt you from NS!” wrote Lydia Ziqri.
  • Kovs Sky Chai said that American and Russian politicians would have developed a palmful of blisters if they were to do that to their gold medal athletes. We live in a bubble. He’s done well, but there is no need for such dramatic treatment. Not when his father was the one who funded his son entirely for his trainings.
  • Skye Chuan Hui wrote, ” Congrats Schooling n his family. His family did the most in supporting him, not the government. Pls wake up Singapore government!”
  • “They did nothing to assist in his achievement, and only when he won, and they tried do stuff to celebrate and ‘claim ownership’ on his victory,” said Ken Koh Hsien Ming.
  • Staley Tan said, “Despite not much support given to him, not much aid and financial support was given to him compare to others. And with his parent strong and capable background. He manage to pursue his dream. Despite all this, he didn’t turn his back against his country and bear no grudge. He proved he can do it. I only hope, everyone also bear no grudge, leave it behind. Although I know they only like to wayang wayang. Hope relevant department win look into this on the local youngster who have the potential but come from a weaker background.”
  • Gov should sponsor his education and training for promising sports men like Schooling and scholarship said Ceril Chan.
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

日做近15小时!菲女佣被非法调派四户家庭打扫

因为印尼籍前女佣巴蒂成功翻案,女佣被非法调派其他地点工作的问题,亦开始引起关注。 人力部在本月8日的文告,显示只有24巴仙的女佣,会自行揭发雇主非法调派的恶行。至于女佣巴蒂在四年前,只因为向前雇主廖文良一家申诉将举报人力部,便被廖家解雇,廖家两日后报警指控巴蒂涉嫌偷窃近5万元财物,包括名表、包包等。 不幸的是,近期职总家庭佣工中心(CDE),亦揭发一名菲籍女佣,被不当要求到另外四户家庭打扫,每周一次还要打扫办公室,平均每日工作,都要长达14至15小时! 然而,这名女佣即使知道这是非法的,但碍于害怕失去工作,只能哑忍长达三年,都不敢向人力部等机构举报。 根据职总家庭佣工中心的脸书贴文,除了繁重的工作,女佣的睡眠和休息时间很短,该中心在介入此事后,协助向人力部举报。不料得知此事的雇主,还企图遣返女佣,所幸在中心介入下未能得逞。女佣最终找到可共事愉快的雇主。 根据规定,除了工作准证列明的住宅地址,雇主是不能非法调派女佣到其他地点工作的。 至于本地客工组织情义之家,也提及在疫情期间,尽管打扫公共组屋的工作量增加,但一些外籍清洁工友的薪资却没有提升,他们有者甚至要工作15至16小时。 即使有,有者仅领取每月区区50至100元的加班费,也缺乏休假和年假。而根据情义之家的估计,这些孟加拉籍的清洁工友,可能每小时工时仅仅二元。   We previously published…

SBF: Business climate worsened over the last 12 months with further decline expected

Two-thirds of businesses in Singapore say that the business climate has worsened…

2012年提议 七年后无障碍斜坡才落成? 毕丹星再吐槽行动党基层组织权限

“一个简单、数月就可完工的无障碍斜坡,却搞到要几年才完成。有多少乐龄人士、行动不便人士或康复者,无法从这类设施受益?然而行动党怎么决定,人民协会在反对党选区运作?至于反对党议员对于社区提出的提案,往往都被人协忽略。” 昨日,工人党阿裕尼集选区议员毕丹星,分享在勿洛蓄水池路第108组屋的无障碍斜坡“千呼万唤始出来”。2012年底,就有群众向阿裕尼后港市镇会提出,要增设有关无障碍斜坡。但方案提出的七年后,才在昨日中午由人民协会移交给市镇会。 毕丹星指出, 每年政府约拨出4000万元,给所有市镇会进行社区翻新项目,但是议员都需通过基层顾问建议提案和批准。 在阿裕尼和后港这样的反对党选区,在上届选举失利的行动党候选人,就成为基层顾问。 他认为,败选的前行动党候选人,可以继续透过这类提升项目与居民保持关联性,甚至可以说是在大选前的拉票,作为基层领袖他们也有权通过分配大笔纳税人公帑。毕丹星说,早在2015年大选,他就已非议行动党实施的这种政治双重标准。 毕丹星指出,行动党第四代领导人一再强调包容性社会、协作式政策等等,然而他们又是否敢于去检讨,正是行动党在政治上制造的分化,才是导致新加坡趋向政治两极化社会的肇因? 他以前总理吴作栋的第二代领导团队的做法作比较。1981年行动党丢失安顺选区,当时吴作栋等领导团队还曾想过将安顺民众俱乐部等基层组织,交给工人党议员惹耶勒南管理,不过年长议员不同意。 荣誉国务资政吴作栋在《高难任务》一书中忆述,年长议员当时认为,交给惹耶勒南,后者将巩固地位,行动党就再难收复安顺。 毕丹星认为,简单的无障碍斜坡却要数年才完成,导致许多居民无法从中受惠,究竟行动党如何决定人协该怎么管理反对党选区? “这是无法接受的,无论是谁当政府还是反对党,新加坡人理应值得更好的。” 事实上,这已不是毕丹星首次吐槽本身选区内的亲行动党基层组织。在2015年大选,毕丹星曾非议人民协会的基层组织并不是“无党派”,而是行动党的“政治工具”。社区设施改进委员会的款项得通过公民咨询委员会批准,但公民咨询委员会却只是照顾人民行动党的选区。…

竞消委会称职总创优收购Kopitiam不违反竞争法令

新加坡竞争与消费者委员会今日宣布,职总创优企业合作社(NTUC Enterprise)收购Kopitiam集团的举动,不触犯竞争法令。 在文告中,竞消委会指经咨询利益相关者,评估所有相关讯息后,认为上述新加坡餐饮市场的竞争,会因为上述并购而大幅减少。 竞消委会认为,职总创优和Kopitiam都不算是最相近的竞争对手,仍有其他强大竞争者如口福集团、Food Junction、美食共和国、金味和大路(Broadway)等餐饮业巨头。 竞消委会也指出,在环境局的监督下,职总创优和Kopitiam个别管理着2011年后建设的其中四家小贩中心,但全国有114间小贩中心。 对此,竞消委会认为由两家合并公司管理的小贩中心对比全国小贩中心总数“相对较少”,故此削弱小贩中心摊位租赁市场竞价能力的“可能性微乎其微”。 竞消委会也不认为,两大集团合并后,有能力阻拦其他竞争对手进入市场,或者有能力强制其他业者或小贩,使用他们的中央厨房和供应链网络。 职总创优在今年9月21日,宣布拟议收购本地咖啡店和小贩中心运营商Kopitiam集团。竞消委会对此曾邀请公众对上述并购提供反馈,公共咨询活动直到10月12日结束。 至于职总创优也在今日发文告,欢迎竞消委会的裁定,并透露预料将再明年一月完成并购计划。 据了解,收购完成后,职总创优旗下的职总富食客和Kopitiam,将个别独立运营,现有管理团队和员工不会更动。Kopitiam客户也能继续在各分行使用优惠卡。 职总创优企业合作社也有意扩大禾园(Rice…