The Government held a motion in Parliament on Monday to congratulate Joseph Schooling on the Olympic gold medal he won on 13 August in the 100m butterfly final at the Rio Olympics 2016.

Parliament Secretary, Ministry of Culture, Community, and Youth Baey Yam Keng, MP Holland Bukit Timah GRC Christopher de Souza, MP for Aljunied GRC Sylvia Lim, and the President of Singapore National Olympic Council Tan Chuan Jin gave words of felicitation to Joseph Schooling and his family, Colin and May Schooling.

Ms Sylvia Lim said that “the winning, which may seem effortless to us, was the result of a lifetime of discipline, training, and sacrifice. However, Joseph parents’ took a big part of his winning for giving him the security to enable him to pursue his dreams, supported his passion for the sport, and tirelessly fought for his cause. They did not take the easy course of asking him to abandon his passion and buckle down to more conventional paths of success.”

Mr Baey said he was glad that the spexScholarship and Race to Rio programme have helped Joseph and the rest of the Olympians fly the country’s flag.

He also stated that in a few weeks the largest-ever Paralympics contingent, 12 athletes across 6 sports, will be sent to Rio.

Mr Christopher said that Singaporeans of all races, Chinese, Malays, Indians, and others, were cheering to see his winning and were proud to see the Singaporean flag on Joseph’s cap.

However, netizens lambasted the motion held by the government. Most of them criticised the act and said that it was only riding on Schooling’s victory.

Schooling’s father had spent more than S$1 million of his own money for his son to come to this stage in his sporting career. However, the government only came in to help just before the “finishing line”, while Baey in his speech emphasized on how the SpexScholarship awarded to Schooling in 2013 helped him to further his success.

Bear in mind that the motion does not hint in any way that efforts to support sporting individuals will be in improved.

The motion was shown live on Channel News Asia.

Min Zheng wrote, “hello CNA can do better editing or not? This is supposed to be a proud moment for the Schooling family and you didn’t even show them in the end but focused on all the MPs only?”

Here are some of the comments written by netizens criticizing the action by Parliament:

  • Chris Loo wrote, “Of course! They are riding on his achievements and claim credit if not for them to defer pls la it’s his Mother who fight relentlessly for issac not the Mindef!”
  • Robert Tan said that Schooling has proved to the Govt and its leaders that locally bred Sporeans can bring glory to SG n not necessary FTs. It is a good gesture to acknowledge his achievement publicly in parliament but pls don’t claim credit.
  • “Standing Ovation from a bunch of ministers that doesn’t know anything about sports and athleticism, doesn’t believe in Sports and probably still don’t,” wrote Bernard Sim.
  • Danson Ong said, “Best actors and actress not from Mediacorp Leh! But the whole parliament is the best actors and actress!! Haha Wayang kings and queens! Hahh”
  • “Ya ya but where were the govt when Joseph was working hard on his mission to be the Gold medalist? He look so tired, let him go home & have his much deserve rest. CONGRATULATIONS JOSEPH SCHOOLING. The govt should exempt you from NS!” wrote Lydia Ziqri.
  • Kovs Sky Chai said that American and Russian politicians would have developed a palmful of blisters if they were to do that to their gold medal athletes. We live in a bubble. He’s done well, but there is no need for such dramatic treatment. Not when his father was the one who funded his son entirely for his trainings.
  • Skye Chuan Hui wrote, ” Congrats Schooling n his family. His family did the most in supporting him, not the government. Pls wake up Singapore government!”
  • “They did nothing to assist in his achievement, and only when he won, and they tried do stuff to celebrate and ‘claim ownership’ on his victory,” said Ken Koh Hsien Ming.
  • Staley Tan said, “Despite not much support given to him, not much aid and financial support was given to him compare to others. And with his parent strong and capable background. He manage to pursue his dream. Despite all this, he didn’t turn his back against his country and bear no grudge. He proved he can do it. I only hope, everyone also bear no grudge, leave it behind. Although I know they only like to wayang wayang. Hope relevant department win look into this on the local youngster who have the potential but come from a weaker background.”
  • Gov should sponsor his education and training for promising sports men like Schooling and scholarship said Ceril Chan.
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Maid sentenced to 8 months in prison for throwing a 5-year-old child to the ground twice

The 24-year-old Indonesian maid who was arrested earlier this year for throwing…

Court of Appeal: Yong Vui Kong’s case has no merit

Kirsten Han / The Court of Appeal, made up of Chief Justice…

三行动党议员认为自动领入息年龄在70岁合理

《亚洲新闻台》在上周的25日,访问国会议员针对中央公积金自动领入息年龄的观点。其中有三名行动党议员,认同公积金局当前把自动领取入息年龄定在70岁的做法。 他们认为,应维持现状,会员若要在65岁就开始提取入息,应向公积金局申请。 其中,巴西立-榜鹅集选区议员再纳(也是职总助理秘书长)认为,上述决策“非常逻辑和有效”,因为会员可以自行选择,要在65岁至70岁之间任何一年申请领取入息。 “如果把自动入息定在65岁,可能有些会员会忘记,而错过申请延迟领入息的时限。” 早前,有网民转载分享,一名即将迎来65岁生日的公积金会员,收到了公积金局的来信。信函通知他,如有意在65岁就开始提取存款,就必须另行通知当局,否则,就要等到70岁才能自动入息。 此事引起群众热议,更讥笑公积金局含糊其辞,不如直接把自动入息定在65岁,简化程序。 不过,凤山议员陈慧玲和蔡厝港集选区议员余家兴,却认同再纳的观点。陈慧玲的正职是林德集团二级产业(企业战略与市场情报)负责人;余家兴则是联昌银行凯利板首发证券(IPO)业务负责人。 陈慧玲认为,两种方案都会有人赞成或反对,对于那些选择延迟入息的人,如果他们忘记而错失申请延迟时机,也会不高兴。 余家兴则补充,随着再就业年龄已经提高到67岁,让民众延迟入息很合理。“会员可以选择在65岁就领入息。但是如果65岁就自动给付,但是如果那时他们还继续工作,就违背了退休金为保障退休生活的目的。” 他也认为,随着人们的寿命增长,如果他们还有工作,应该延迟领入息,来保障他们晚年生活。 但,很显然余家兴忽略了,有好些老人从事的都是清洁工和保安等低薪工作,还要一直很努力地维持他们的生计。

AWARE denounces hosts of OKLETSGO podcast for their misogynistic language used to describe women

Gender-equality organisation AWARE took to its Facebook on Monday (15 June) to…