[vimeo id=”120986312″ align=”center” mode=”normal”]

By Terry Xu

In recent days, fish farmers off the coast of Pasir Ris have seen almost all their fish stocks die off. Death of the fish stock in alarming numbers started from 16 February and have persisted since.

The fish farmers have been working furiously for the past few weeks to salvage their fish farms, but the scene at the farms remains one of devastation, with a sea of dead fishes floating in the fishnets.

Many of the fish farmers have given up. Mr Philip Lim, a fish farmer and Chairman of Singapore Marine Aquaculture Cooperative lost $50,000 worth of his fish stock at his farm.

Cause of death for the fishes – suffocation or toxins?

In a statement, AVA said that post-mortem of fish samples collected from the affected farms indicated the fish had died as a result of gill damage caused by a kind of plankton. These are micro-organisms are found in seawater and they bloomed or multiply quickly in a very short time, draining the seawater of oxygen. AVA also declared that there were no marine biotoxins detected in the waters to have caused the death.

It would appear that while AVA concedes that there is algae bloom, it has decided that it was not Harmful Algae Bloom (HAB), which would might lead to the production of marine biotoxins that could kill fish.

Mr Lim disagreed with the verdict. From his many years of experience as a fish farmer, he said that he would be able to tell if a fish died from suffocation or poisoning. “If a fish is suffocating, it will swim to the surface, and can be kept alive with an air pump. However, if it is suffering from poisoning, it will die in a very short time. This is what has happened.”

Pointing to the dead fishes in one of his nets, he was convinced that there was something toxic in the water. He also pointed out that the fishes that were transferred into water tanks with the air pump eventually died.

Mr Lim also asked if AVA has the in-house marine biology expertise to make such a conclusion, and noted that he has not personally seen the report from the laboratory tests that AVA has done.

In the previous occurrence in February 2014, a seminar was held subsequently in May at AVA’s auditorium at Lim Chu Kang about HAB soon after the death of the fishes in February. The seminar was presented by Dr Sandric Leong from Tropical Marine Science Institute, National University of Singapore (NUS).

[youtube id=”-guoNZK2Z24″ align=”center” mode=”normal”]

Replying to TOC’s enquiry about whether HAB was the cause of mass death in the fish stocks of the coastal fish farms last year. Dr Sendric said that it was not conclusive to say that HAB was the cause.

Mr Lim felt that Dr Sandric was not forthright in his reply to TOC. In the latest occurrence, AVA also said that no marine biotoxins were detected in the waters and that bewildered Lim .

“It was clearly HAB”, said Mr Lim. “If the deaths were not related to HAB, why would AVA make such arrangements and not on other potential causes?”, He also stated that that was also the first time the fish farmers were asked to attend such a seminar.

He stated that AVA specifically arranged the NUS professor to make a speech on HAB to the fishermen affected by the fish deaths.

 

No action by AVA despite early warning

In its statement on 27 February, AVA said it would monitor the situation, and work closely with the fish farmers to mitigate the problem. AVA also said that it had warned the farmers early last week after detecting elevated plankton levels in the area.

However, Mr Lim said that it was he and the others at the coastal fish farms who had first alerted AVA about potential HAB along the Johor Straits on 27 January 2015.

A fish farmer for more than 10 years, Mr Lim had created an early-warning system to monitor water conditions and track signs of HAB. He complained that AVA did not respond to his alarm although they replied that they would look into the matter.

“This time the problem is graver than the episode last year, as even the wild fishes are affected. Wild fishes are more resilient as they are in the open sea and are able to swim away from the affected area instinctively.”

Photographs by nature enthusiast Sean Yap last week showed Pasir Ris beaches with a huge quantity and variety of dead marine life washed up on the shores.

Cause of HAB a result of mulitple factors

Mr Lim, who is currently involved in an Urban Redevelopment Authority’s (URA) project to enhance the natural habitat to support recovering of species of plant and animals in Palau Ubin, said that HAB is caused by three main factors – rising sea temperature, dumping of palm tree seeds from neighbouring countries, and the damage of the ecology due to reclamation and coastal activities.

He believed that, beyond environment controls, there must be political will to protect the livelihood of the fish farmers and ensure food safety and security.

No assistance for independently run fish farms

AVA said that it deployed waste disposal vessels to assist farmers in the disposal of dead fish at the East Johor Straits caused by the elevated plankton levels.

However, Mr Lim said that AVA only sent the vessels to industrial fish farms and not small independent fish farms run by local Singaporeans like him.

“So far, AVA only sent technicians down to collect dead fishes and water samples,” he said. “They did not even have the courtesy to provide the results of their laboratory tests to us.”

He has another grouse with AVA: The differential treatments received by the industrial fish farms.  “AVA sent boats to help pull the industrial fish farms to safer areas behind Tekong Island, where the HAB has yet to spread. But we independent fish farmers are caught in a bind. Without AVA’s authorization we are unable to take similar appropriate actions. We would be fined if we were caught by AVA.”

TOC has written to AVA for their response on Monday and will include its comments when they reply.

Toxin in fishes?

AVA said, “Laboratory tests conducted so far did not detect marine biotoxins in the fish,”.

“Says who?” asked Mr Lim. According to Mr Lim, AVA does not have an in-house marine biologist and ask if there is any 3rd party laboratory which AVA is basing their report on.

According to Amercia’s Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

“Harmful marine algae, such as those associated with red tides , occur in the ocean and can produce toxins that may harm or kill fish and marine animals.

…In addition to killing fish, brevetoxins can become concentrated in the tissues of shellfish that feed on K. brevis. People who eat these shellfish may suffer from neurotoxic shellfish poisoning, a food poisoning that can cause severe gastrointestinal and neurologic symptoms, such as tingling fingers or toes.”

Mr Lim feels that AVA should have the sale of seafood at the Pasir Ris fish farms suspended till the reports from the laboratory certify that it is safe to do so.

In fact, that was what AVA did in the mass fish deaths incident in February last year by sending letters to fish farmers when the fishes started dying and instructing them to stop the sale of fishes until it is safe to do so.

Some of the fish farmers had already sold their fishes since 16 February when the fishes started dying and still are. Mr Lim said he did not sell any fishes from his farm even if it meant making a loss.

[youtube id=”Zeg6t5FK3Ps” align=”center” mode=”normal”]

In an interview with Channel 8, Mr Chan Wei Loong, Head of Department in Marine Science and Aquaculture of Republic Polytechnic said that fishes will remain unsafe for consumption if death is caused by poisoning, even if the fish is thoroughly cooked.

In addition, if the fishes are collected to be sold when they are dead, micro-organism may find its way into the fish bodies and produce toxins which cannot be removed through cooking.

Laboratory test supports fish farmers’ suspicion

In the laboratory test commissioned by TODAY, it is said that the species of algae behind the mass fish deaths off Pasir Ris likely belongs to the Gymnodinium group.

It is suspected to be Gymnodinium mikimotoi, according to the experts at DHI Water & Environment, but the exact species can only be confirmed through further genetic tests. Gymnodinium mikimotoi, also known as Karenia mikimotoi, is not toxic to humans, but has been associated with massive kills of wild and farmed fishes in Japan and Korea.

The test showed concentrations of the algae at 88,529 cells per millilitre – a “very, very high” concentration, according to Dr Hans Eikaas, head of environmental technology and chemistry at DHI, a not-for-profit group offering consultancy and water-modelling services.

However, Dr Eikaas said that the algae is not known to cause any effect to humans who have eaten affected fish if the suspected species is indeed the Gymnodinium mikimotoi.

Subscribe
Notify of
14 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

191 additional COVID-19 infection; 8th death confirmed and 119 untraceble cases

As of Saturday (11 April), 12 pm, the Ministry of Health (MOH)…

【2020财政预算案】明年一月起购电动汽车 可获高达45巴仙回扣

明年一月起,购买全电动汽车和德士的额外注册费,可获得高达45巴仙的回扣。 副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰于国会上公布新财政预算案时宣布,为了到2040年全面淘汰内燃引擎交通工具,政府推出三项方案: 政府将为轻型货车推出“商用车减排税务计划”;而购买全电动的车辆或德士的人士,在缴交”汽车附加注册费”时将享有45巴仙的津贴,最高可获两万元回扣。优惠将从2021年开始落实,为其三年。 将扩大电动汽车充电基础设施,目前我国有1千600个电动车充电点,而我国期望在2030年能够将充电点扩大至2万8千个充电点。 政府带头逐渐开始采购和使用环保交通工具。 王瑞杰说,政府将从明年1月起,在三年内分阶段对电动车辆征收一次性的路税,一些电动汽车车主需缴付的路税会更高,不过由于有了电动汽车附加注册费优惠,车主仍然可以节省一笔费用。 然而,王瑞杰也透露,燃油消费目前为我国带来至少10亿元的收入,但逐渐被电动车取代,因此,电动车辆不需要支付燃油消费税,就需要更新目前的交通税框架。 对此,政府将在明年1月起,为电动汽车征收一次性支付的路税。但距离我国全面采用该新系统仍有几年的差距,因此,政府将在这段过度期间,改以一次性征税的形式来弥补日后所失的燃油税,并于明年1月至2023年1月份段实施,不过,电动车车主仍能通过电动车附加注册费优惠计划,省下不少成本费用。

销毁不符防火标准个人代步工具 两周内接获2800申请

在短短两周内,陆路交通管理局已经接到超过2800份,有关销毁不符合防火标准的个人代步工具之申请。 交通部高级政务部长普杰立医生在今天的国会上,回答议员提问时指出,自上个月23日到本月3日,当局也在这两周内,回收了超过940台不符合标准的个人代步工具。 陆交局自上个月开始,在指定地点收取民众不符合UL2272防火标准的代步工具,而符合资格的民众可获得100元的奖励金。 明年起每两年需强行检查 陆交局宣布,为了确保已经上路的电动滑板车符合安全规格,已注册的电动滑板车自明年4月起,必须每两年接受强行检查。 当局指出,在明年4月1日前注册,拥有UL2272认证的电动滑板车,都必须进行当局所安排的强制性免费检查。他呼吁持有者在接到通知后,将电动滑板车带到全岛九个检查中心中的任何一间进行调查。 而在明年4月1日之后申请注册的电动滑板车,则需要通过检查后才能注册。 持有者若没在期限内将电动滑板车送往检查,将有可能面对不超过1000元的罚款,或不超过三个月的监禁,或两者兼施。