Money Logging panel discussionBy Ghui

Transparency is of utmost importance in building a system whereby the ruled are not oppressed or browbeaten by their rulers. Transparency can be fostered in a number of ways – having robust opposition parties to question the incumbent to ensure accountability and a free press to keep the powers be in check.

Information is an essential commodity for answerability and he who controls information controls the crowd. That is how despots the world over have managed to maintain control over the populace, often times enriching themselves at the expense of the masses who have been kept ignorant through the machinations of a state controlled press.

This tight rein wielded over the media is beginning to loosen in our Internet age and the means of transmitting information is bringing about the winds of change both in the social and political arenas.

Closer to home in Sarawak, we witness how the alleged corruption and cronyism exercised by Chief Minister Abdul Taib Mahmud has attracted the interest of investigative journalists, bloggers and activists.

I was privileged to be able to attend the London launch of Lukas Straumann’s meticulously researched book “Money Logging, On the Trail of the Asian Timber Mafia”.  Prior to the launch, publishers and distributors of the book were slapped with letters alleging defamation. However, the author stood by his facts and both publishers and distributors have not reacted to the letters and the publication and distribution has gone ahead.

Taib was even invited to defend his wealth by joining a panel discussion made up of author Lukas Straumann, editor of Sarawak Report Clare Rewcastle Brown, director of The Borneo Project Jettie Word, lawyer and state legislative assembly member See Chee How, and Finance and Trade Campaigner for FERN Mark Gregory. Taib did not attend and a chair was left empty in his honour.

Money Logging cover 1The book read like a thriller with suspected murders, suicide, bribery, fraud, exploitation and disappearances. While engaging, one must be reminded that this is based on what has happened and what is continuing to happen in Sarawak. This is not a fictional John Le Carr novel.

The degree of sleaze and blatant disregard for the livelihood of masses of indigenous people highlighted in the book beggars belief. Evidence was provided by numerous whistle blowers and many years of sheer labour-intensive research, documenting the rape of Sarawak’s rainforests, the systematic destruction of a state’s natural resources to benefit only a few of those on top while riding rough shod over the heritage of the common people.

The ongoing debate in Sarawak is a stark reminder of how important having adequate checks and balances are. As Lord Action once said, “Absolute power corrupts absolutely”.

The book is as riveting as it is disturbing and is a living example of why those in power must always be accountable to the people who they rule. While it is about Sarawak, it has many parallels to many countries in the world where transparency is an issue.

Knowledge is power and the common people must never be denied knowledge of issues that affect them. The right to information is a crucial ingredient to democracy and is a right worth fighting for.

In the Sarawak example, it is believed that a lack of information through state sanctioned manipulation has led to the extreme destruction of its rainforests, which in turn enriched only a handful while rendering many others destitute. There is also the need to contend with the potential of many irreversible environmental repercussions that affect us globally.

Has all this happened because of a rampantly corrupt system lacking in transparency, which enabled one man’s greed to triumph over the common good?

A freer press and vigorous, effective opposition parties is the only way to safeguard against a misuse of power, which can have disastrous consequences. The possible pitfalls of absolute power are too great to risk.

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Government accepts all data security recommendations by review committee; to roll out 80% by end 2021

The government will be rolling out recommendations from the Public Sector Data…

【2020财政预算案】三行业S准证持有者比率 将逐年下调

副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰说,当局将S准证持有者比率分两阶段进行调整。从明年1月起,先把顶限调低到18巴仙。到2023年1月,再调低到15巴仙。 其中涉及的行业包括三大行业建筑业、海事造船业与加工业,因此在未来三年内将调低五个百分点。 王瑞杰说,为了能够让本地劳动力获得公平机会,政府也一直在与同业者和教育机构积极合作,培养本地劳动队伍。 过去两年,建筑业、制造业、海事造船业和加工业的S准证持有者每年增加3.8巴仙,未来几年可能还会显著增长。 政府去年已宣布,服务业S准证持有者比率顶限明年起从13巴仙降至10巴仙。目前各行业中只有制造业尚未受影响,但政府也会在条件允许时收紧该领域外劳配额。 王瑞杰表示,外籍劳工一直都是本地劳动市场的一部分,但随着本地劳动市场增长的放缓,外籍劳工也逐渐成为本地的劳动市场的重要支柱。

Hougang is not WP's own little fiefdom

~by: Ravi Philemon~ Should Hougang be reserved exclusively for Workers' Party (WP)…

英兰妮为唯才是举背书 为何不谈德才兼备?

上周四(18日),总理公署部长英兰妮席由国大文学暨社会科学院社会服务研究中心主办,探讨如何援助低收入家庭。期间她表示,第四代政府领导班子的任务,是为国人在每个人生阶段创造机会,确保一个人的成就不取决于出身。 英兰妮兼任财政部及教育部第二部长。她说,不平等和社会流动问题早在1965年的“新加坡独立宣言”中就已提到。不同的是当年大家一样穷,随着经济发展,不同收入的家庭累积资源不均,大家因此关注底层孩子的起跑点会越来越落于人后,妨碍社会流动。 不过,本地中文媒体未提及英兰妮针对“唯才是举”(meritocracy)阐述的看法。本地英语媒体都有报导,英兰妮为唯才是举制背书,认为重新审视唯才是举制不是正确的做法。 记者节译刊载于《海峡时报》的英兰妮致辞稿,在演讲中英兰妮指出,唯才是举根据个人表现能力委任职务,能遏制贪腐和裙带关系,如果废除掉唯才是举制度,就等同邀请那些弊端腐蚀国家的体制。 “每个人都想达成最佳成就” “哪个父母不想孩子成龙成凤?学生们也有自己的理想抱负。每一代人都希望能达致最佳的成就,阻止他们是不对的。” 英兰妮辩护,问题的关键并不是唯才是举制,而是虽然国家和政府已经尽力提供平等机会,但是来自低收入和弱势背景的群体,仍难以跻身获得这些机会。 “所以,我们的方针不应该是为往上爬设顶限;要缩减鸿沟让大家可以一起向上,应改善那些较弱势一群的机遇、提供充分的机会。让唯才是举制发挥作用。” 她补充,与此同时也需要有多元管道来追求事业和成就,确保持续的社会流动。“有些人脚步较快,有些较慢;有者可能走相似的道路,有者走较少走的小径。在他们自身的努力,如果需要政府或他人的支持下,大家最终都能取得好的结果–当然不一定是同样的成果。” 所以,政府的措施是双重的,英兰妮强调政府一方面继续加强对少数群体的支持,其次则继续建设在每个人生阶段“充满机遇的社会”。 政治精英对唯才是举制爱不释手 新加坡的政治精英始终舍不得唯才是举制。有多少年来,我们奉唯才是举之名,精英群体都被被行销成有才干、有智慧、有表现绩效的精英,因为他们闪亮的奖学金、受过英语教育、世家背景和一大串的奖项和(军事)资历,就更容易被纳入精英圈子中。…