Money Logging panel discussionBy Ghui

Transparency is of utmost importance in building a system whereby the ruled are not oppressed or browbeaten by their rulers. Transparency can be fostered in a number of ways – having robust opposition parties to question the incumbent to ensure accountability and a free press to keep the powers be in check.

Information is an essential commodity for answerability and he who controls information controls the crowd. That is how despots the world over have managed to maintain control over the populace, often times enriching themselves at the expense of the masses who have been kept ignorant through the machinations of a state controlled press.

This tight rein wielded over the media is beginning to loosen in our Internet age and the means of transmitting information is bringing about the winds of change both in the social and political arenas.

Closer to home in Sarawak, we witness how the alleged corruption and cronyism exercised by Chief Minister Abdul Taib Mahmud has attracted the interest of investigative journalists, bloggers and activists.

I was privileged to be able to attend the London launch of Lukas Straumann’s meticulously researched book “Money Logging, On the Trail of the Asian Timber Mafia”.  Prior to the launch, publishers and distributors of the book were slapped with letters alleging defamation. However, the author stood by his facts and both publishers and distributors have not reacted to the letters and the publication and distribution has gone ahead.

Taib was even invited to defend his wealth by joining a panel discussion made up of author Lukas Straumann, editor of Sarawak Report Clare Rewcastle Brown, director of The Borneo Project Jettie Word, lawyer and state legislative assembly member See Chee How, and Finance and Trade Campaigner for FERN Mark Gregory. Taib did not attend and a chair was left empty in his honour.

Money Logging cover 1The book read like a thriller with suspected murders, suicide, bribery, fraud, exploitation and disappearances. While engaging, one must be reminded that this is based on what has happened and what is continuing to happen in Sarawak. This is not a fictional John Le Carr novel.

The degree of sleaze and blatant disregard for the livelihood of masses of indigenous people highlighted in the book beggars belief. Evidence was provided by numerous whistle blowers and many years of sheer labour-intensive research, documenting the rape of Sarawak’s rainforests, the systematic destruction of a state’s natural resources to benefit only a few of those on top while riding rough shod over the heritage of the common people.

The ongoing debate in Sarawak is a stark reminder of how important having adequate checks and balances are. As Lord Action once said, “Absolute power corrupts absolutely”.

The book is as riveting as it is disturbing and is a living example of why those in power must always be accountable to the people who they rule. While it is about Sarawak, it has many parallels to many countries in the world where transparency is an issue.

Knowledge is power and the common people must never be denied knowledge of issues that affect them. The right to information is a crucial ingredient to democracy and is a right worth fighting for.

In the Sarawak example, it is believed that a lack of information through state sanctioned manipulation has led to the extreme destruction of its rainforests, which in turn enriched only a handful while rendering many others destitute. There is also the need to contend with the potential of many irreversible environmental repercussions that affect us globally.

Has all this happened because of a rampantly corrupt system lacking in transparency, which enabled one man’s greed to triumph over the common good?

A freer press and vigorous, effective opposition parties is the only way to safeguard against a misuse of power, which can have disastrous consequences. The possible pitfalls of absolute power are too great to risk.

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Parliament: WP’s Gerald Giam questions Government on its timeline to restore S$52 billion taken from reserves to weather COVID-19 pandemic

The Government must provide the “broad timeline” to restore the S$52 billion…

SPH appoints former NOL CEO as its new Chief Executive Officer

Singapore Press Holdings Limited (SPH) announced today that it will be appointing…

台湾前总统李登辉病逝 享年98岁

台湾前总统李登辉,于本月30日晚间7时24分,在台北病逝,享年98岁。 今年2月,因喝牛奶呛伤,引发吸入性肺炎,住院近半年,状况也起起伏伏;他生前也曾罹患大肠癌,有心脏病、糖尿病等问题。 他曾是台湾最有权势的政治人物。1988年,接替离世的蒋经国就任总统。直到1996年,在台湾首场民主选举胜选,继续当总统到2000年离任。 李登辉出生于日治时期的台北淡水郡三芝庄,为台湾客家人后代。自小在台湾接受日式教育,1943中学毕业前往日本就读京都大学农业经济系,日文名字是岩里政男。 1965年,李登辉赴美,于康乃尔大学工读农业经济博士,学成后返台回到当时的农复会工作,开始步入政坛,并受蒋经国赏识,此后政途平步青云,先后出任台北市市长,中华民国台湾省政府主席,并在1984年获蒋经国提拔,担任副总统一职。

陈振声:分享数据不是所有政策课题的“万灵药”

贸工部长陈振声认为,分享数据不是解决所有政策课题的“万灵药”,能赢得人民信任且确保数据获得客观分析也很重要。 然而,他又期望在挑战和政策议题上,能和国人有更深入的讨论。 李光耀公共政策学院政策研究所,于昨日举办2020年度新加坡透视论坛。陈振声在对话会上回答与会者提问时,这么表示。 当时人民力量党秘书长吴明盛在会上提出,政府应提供更多数据,以促进更有建设性的政策辩论。 他指出,如果对数据有先入为主的看法,就可能以特定的角度诠释之。 此前陈振声与工人党议员毕丹星,针对国内PMET就业课题在国会交锋。他以此为例,永久公民的就业数据看起来较好,结果有者就指“政府不关心公民”,或者偏好永久居民等。 指民主党对人力部数据“断章取义” 此外,民主党也被点名,该党此前被人力部发出指示要求更正网络贴文。陈振声指出,尽管都有提供数据,但被“断章取义”(truncated)。 他认为,有数据是好事,但也必须客观地看待,“如果人们都不相信你,你给再多的数据也无法赢得民心。” 此外,他也列举出对新加坡政治体系的三大愿望,其中之一就是希望对于国家挑战和政策议题,能和国人有更深层次的讨论。其二是希望新加坡人需对外部局势能更加了解,以及维持为下一代着想做决策的精神。