Yesterday, TOC shared on our facebook about a post by Ms Zarina Jaffar on Mr Suhaime Roa, visually handicap busker and is a father of 4 children.

She wrote that Suhaime is a prolific song writer and singers back in the 80’s. For the past few years he has been busking at Causeway Point and Civic centre, Woodlands. It is also written that he has a license from the National Art Council for his busking activities.

The problem highlighted by Zarina is that Suhaime has on several occasions been harassed by a SMRT officer, named Edmund Chong Kong Lum from Woodlands MRT. The officer is said to order Suhaime to move away from the usual place he used to play.

suhaime woodlands

Suhaime would comply at times and if not, the officer would call the police.

She then added that the harassment got so bad that a police report was lodged against the officer but it still continued.

His wife wrote to Zarina, “We’ve been tolerating this far too much. We did go to MPs to seek advice n help. As a responsible man, Suhaime just want to earn a living by trading his talent for the family. Insyaallah.”

In another message, she wrote, “He came again. Demand to see Suhaime’s busking license. He want to make report to NAC tomorrow. We refused to give. Told him that he got no right to see as we are not in his ground.
He said he will call the police. We told him to go ahead…”. “He call Transcom Policeman. They also agree that it’s not MRT ground.”

“Just now, he’s not happy when Transcom Police refuse to give Suhaime’s particulars because the policemen said that Suhaime is not MRT ground. He call NPC. NPC came n told him the same thing. Our friend still not happy:, when the Transcom Policemen refused to give Suhaime’s particulars to him, he took down the Policemen’s particulars? What was he up to? Is he trying to manipulate with the Police too?

“Even the CWP staff talk to him. He wants to show his power”

Zarina noted that the ground where Suhaime is performing is not under the SMRT premises.

In photo below, Zarina shared how the SMRT officer made life difficult for Suhaime by putting a barrier in front of Suhaime. It is said that this has been going on for 2-3 years by the same person.

smrt busker

In a response to enquries by members of the general public on its facebook fanpage, SMRT has posted a clarification over the incident.

We support buskers at our MRT stations.

At this point, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) has allowed busking at 5 designated MRT Stations. These are Raffles Place, City Hall, Jurong East, Eunos and Bukit Batok.

To perform at any of these 5 stations, buskers need to seek approval from both the National Arts Council (NAC) and LTA.

It is unfortunate that Woodlands is not part of the current trial. We hope that it is included soon.

And when that happens, we hope buskers at Woodlands MRT station will apply for licenses from both the NAC and LTA.

We all look forward to making our MRT stations more lively so that our journeys can be made more pleasant.
Thank you.

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Politics not your cup of Starbucks?

By Victoria – I wrote this article for the purposes of putting my…

PV’s Lim Tean: People want a gov’t that cares for them, instead of profiting from its citizens

On today’s (7 July) Facebook Live broadcast hosted by Peoples Voice’s (PV)…

议员国会重提组屋养猫议题 何晶隔空呛:狗能关家里,猫会串门子

组屋养宠物课题再次在国会中被提起,义顺集选区议员黄国光,曾要求允许在政府组屋住户养猫,然而总理夫人何晶却似乎认为,禁止养猫是理所当然的,让国民对此感到哭笑不得。 黄国光于周三(3月4日)在国会上,谈及组屋禁止养猫的课题时,表示该条例不可理喻。“既然公寓居民能够饲养猫咪当宠物,没道理组屋居民不行。” 黄国光指有办法管理 他指出,一些公寓单位甚至比组屋单位来的小,而且有些组屋允许居民养狗,甚至是体型较大的狗狗,为何要禁止饲养一只小猫咪。“这真的没道理。” 黄国光指出,有居民投诉,猫咪会随意“串门”和制造噪音,他认为组屋当局和居民可以合作,采取简单的防范措施,包括为宠物猫做结扎等。 他更表示自己手上持有“第一手防范措施资料”,希望国家发展部能够参考后,放行居民饲养猫咪。 内政部兼国家发展部高级政务次长孙雪玲回答表示,对于爱宠物和不欢迎宠物的两派居民,当局正致力和他们沟通;建屋局将和国家公园局合作,以商讨出更全面和平衡地重检和拟出新的宠物相关政策。 何晶:狗狗能关家中 总理夫人何晶对于黄国光的发言,也在脸书上贴文做出回应,只是她似乎不太赞成组屋养猫咪。 对于黄国光指组屋能够养狗却不给养猫,何晶在帖文中写到,“因为我们可以把狗放在屋子内,但是猫咪会闯进别人的家啊!”。 网民:主人责任心是关键 有关帖文迅速获得网民回应,有人赞成也有人反对。…

民主党要求撤更正指示:征询法律意见呈书面回应

人力部长对新加坡民主党,三则有关PMET(专业人士、经理、执行员与技师)课题的贴文发出更正指示,后者选择上诉高庭,诉讼本月16日审理。 在昨日(17日)的审讯,代表政府的总检察署指根据公开的数据,显示民主党作出的声明是虚假的,副总检察长哈里古玛认为一般理性读者都会认为,后者是在指当前本地PMET裁员有增长。 该党秘书长徐顺全则反问“谁才是理性读者、且谁能决定什么数据才算‘当前’的?”而是用这样的主观术语,又如何能确定该党做了虚假陈述?他重申这不能仅基于部长的诠释。 民主党选择自行辩护。基于双方论点牵涉技术和法律问题,法官同意让民主党征询法律意见,并在下周三(22日)前提呈书面回应陈词。目前法官仍保留判决,择日下判。 民主党主席淡马亚此前指出,实际上该党都是根据人力部公开的资料,作出的“合理诠释”。 徐顺全则指出,实则人力部的数据同样无误,只不过是选择使用不同时期的数据,却反指该党的数据是不对的,即便该党的资料也是来自人力部。 徐顺全强调,在法庭讨论的关键点,是一般理性人士会如何看待民主党发表的声明。