By Terry Xu
Mr Tan, (not his real name) was at Centrepoint on Good Friday, last week when he met with a very unpleasant incident involving a middle aged Caucasian man at the shopping mall’s carpark.
At about 7.10pm when Mr Tan entered the Centrepoint Car Park,  he noticed a car (Black Audi, SGC8430R) behind him in the left lane while driving on the right lane of the carpark towards the basement. However to reasons unknown to Mr Tan, the driver of the black Audi seemed to be annoyed by him as the driver horned loudly several times for an extended period.
After reascertaining that he was in the correct lane, he then proceeded to the basement. Mr Tan said that after proceeding down the ramp, the black Audi accelerated down the ramp as well and tailgated his car in the carpark.
Mr Tan then managed to find a lot and proceeded to enter the parking lot. At this time, the car stopped alongside his car as it was still within the access lane of the car park.
The driver, a western Caucasian looking man in his 50s got out of the car, opened his driver’s side door and started yelling at him, demanding an apology from him.
Video attached for a recording of this happening. (No earlier recording was made of the incident until the driver came over to open the door of the car)

Mr Tan refused to abide to the demand as he felt that he is not in the wrong. He added that the driver might have then realised that he was being recorded on video, and therefore tried to go to the passenger side door to open it (Which was then locked). Failing to open the door, the driver spoke vulgarities at the two and gave a hard tap to the car window before driving away from the scene.
When asked if Mr Tan can explain why the other driver was so angry and why was the man able to open the car door, he said,

“We totally did not expect him to do that. Hence doors weren’t locked.
No, he definitely did not signal. His lane is meant to turn to a ramp leading upstairs. My lane is meant to turn to basement.
He wanted to turn to basement and was behind our car in the wrong lane.
When I turned, he horned numerous times. I’m a paranoid driver so I stopped and checked if I was in the wrong lane. I wasn’t. I’m sure of that. Then I continued
He still wasn’t happy and tailgated me in the carpark until I found a lot, then the altercation took place”

Feeling intimidated and worried for his car, Mr Tan went to the Centrepoint mall security who then advised for him to move the car and make a police report.

police report
Police report made for the incident
When Mr Tan made the police report, the police took the details of the incident down but said it is a civil case.  The police advised him that he would have to take it up with a magistrate if he was keen on pursuing the case further. There was no follow up on the issue by the police but Mr Tan felt that the incident should have been considered as an act of criminal intimidation.
He added, “Him punching the car etc not enough to say intimidation? To be fair I don’t actually want the guy jailed or anything.” “Seriously he should get a warning at least.”
He further related to the xenophobia trend that locals are facing,  losing community spirit and caring values.  “I’m not xenophobic. And still think that this is just a case of one bad egg”
“But the increase of foreign appearing people behaving badly in the media is bound to affect the mindsets of the natives.”
This story has been sent to the police for further comments. 
*Update
The police replied and wrote,
We regret to inform you that the Police do not provide views based on examples of scenarios.
Please rest assured that the Police have taken cognizance of your feedback. We have alerted the relevant Police department for their attention. We would also like to take this opportunity to share that as all information relating to investigations is classified as privileged and confidential, and we acknowledge that you are not an involved party in the case, we regret that we would not be able to provide any update to you on our findings.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

穆仁理坚称组屋区已有现成“人行道” 惟网民反映怕“天降横祸”

民主党秘书长徐顺全,发文反映武吉巴督其中一座组屋,缺乏合适的人行道;该区议员穆仁理坚称,组屋区已有可供居民使用的现成步道,包括在组屋底层的空间。 惟一些网民也表达他们的担忧,不是他们不愿使用这些“步道”,实在是过往曾发生高空抛物案件,居民担忧“天降横祸”,才宁可远离组屋楼下。要鼓励居民使用现有步道,还需要遏止高空抛物的恶行。 徐顺全是在本月6日,在脸书上发文指出,武吉巴督第190座组屋缺乏人行道,许多居民走在路旁,车辆往来十分危险。 他也在脸书上晒出照片,照片中可见,妇女手牵着一名孩子,只能冒着危险在大马路上行走,而且车子与行人的距离非常小,很可能会发生意外。 “车子与行人的距离相当近,而且还有许多行人牵着小孩,冒着危险越过马路,因为这是他们唯一经过的道路。” 他也目睹了行人只能在车子经过时,将孩子拉向身边,而车子也尽量往外挪动,避免撞倒孩子。 基于行人的安全,徐顺全也向一些居民询问,不少居民对这种现象见怪不怪,因此也希望能够希望有安全的人行道。 甚至有居民向武吉巴督人民行动党议员穆仁理申述,但却被告知若一旦开始建人行道,可能又会进一步要求,增建雨盖步道等。 徐顺全敦促穆仁理和裕廊-金文泰市镇会市镇会,应该在意外未发生前着手处理,保障居民安全。 帖文发出后,引发网友的讨论,目前已获得2千900赞和295转载。对此,议员穆仁里也做出回应。 他表示,针对武吉巴督组屋内没有设置人行道一事在网络疯传,居民看似被迫在大马路上或草地上行走,也因此收到不少网友的提醒。 穆仁里也张贴一张当地居民的邮件回应此事。信件内容指出,居民林先生已在当地居住逾30年,而且一直都有遮屏的无障碍通道。与此同时,他也晒出武吉巴督组屋的无障碍通道。…

17 men arrested for smuggling duty-unpaid cigarettes

17 men, aged between 22 and 48, were arrested by the Police Coast…

PAP seemingly fulfills childcare needs of new families while pushing its political agenda

Families who live in Bukit Panjang, Sengkang, and Punggol will be able…

Man sentenced to 18 weeks imprisonments for each of two counts of animal cruelty

A 25-year old Singaporean man, Fajar Ashraf Bin Fajar Ali, was sentenced…