I refer to the article “Unions helping workers affected by closure of Five Stars Tours” (Channel NewsAsia, Jan 18).
Unions helping Five Stars Tours’ workers?
In a joint statement by Singapore Manual and Mercantile Workers’ Union (SMMWU) and National Trades Union Congress (NTUC), they said that the affected workers of Five Stars Tours will be informed of the avenues of assistance that are available to them.
The two union bodies will provide S$600 worth of vouchers to each of the union members to help them with the purchase of daily necessities.
Sometimes, when you read the news – you may feel that it may raise even more questions than what apparently the news may seem to want to inform members of the public.
Some rather obvious questions that come to mind are such as,  how many and what percentage of the tour agency’s workers are union members, who will be helped? Moving to an even larger picture of the issue, what percentage of workers in travel agencies in Singapore are union members?
Instead of just saying that affected workers will be informed of the avenues of assistance that are available to them, why not just state the “avenues of assistance”? As to “Members will be contacted on the details of these vouchers” – why not just give the details of these vouchers?

“Affected members can seek the help of SMMWU in their job search by contacting the union and providing their resumes for job-matching with other unionised companies of SMMWU.”

How many unionised companies are there in SMMWU? Are any of them travel agencies?

“Affected workers who are Singaporeans or PRs (but not citizens) can approach NTUC’s e2i (Employment and Employability Institute) for assistance with training and job placements.

So non-citizens can approach NTUC or SMMWU for assistance – I find this to be rather confusing.
Let me explain why.
If you are an affected worker from the travel agency – and you are a union member regardless of whether you are a citizen, PR or foreigner – you can contact the SMMWU.
But it also says that if you are a Singaporean or PR (union or non-union member, but not if you are a non-citizen), you contact e2i for training and job placements.
It appears that the SMMWU can only help you to find a job with other unionised companies of SMMWU, whereas e2i can help you to find a job with any company in Singapore, as well as for assistance for training.
And here’s perhaps the most confusing part – if you are a non-citizen, you can approach NTUC or SMMWU.
Now, why would NTUC and SMMWU help a non-citizen who is not a union member? Or does it mean that this “help” statement only applies to non-citizens who are union members? Or could it be that unions will now help non-citizens who are not union members too, as the statement seems to imply?
And what exactly does “can approach NTUC or SMMWU” mean? What exactly happens and what help can you expect – since you are not a union member as well as a non-citizen?
In the past, got help?
In the past, did the labour movement give $600 vouchers to union members whose travel agency employers or other companies closed down abruptly? Did the SMMWU help them to find jobs  in other unionised companies of SMMWU. If so, what has been its success rate?
Do the other unions provide the same job matching service as the SMMWU?
Good news first time?
Is this the first time that the union movement has issued a media statement to help travel agency closure workers in this way, as I do not recall ever reading something like this for the several travel agency closures in previous years?
How many and what percentage of travel agency closure workers have been helped with vouchers, and successfully placed in jobs by the unions, in the past?
Leong Sze Hian

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Dear PM Lee, what will your legacy be?

By Patrick Low Dear PM Lee, Very soon you will be stepping…

致函拒沈佳泉提取公积金 公积金局:健康评估未通过

日前, 本社报道56岁公民沈佳泉因心脏衰竭想透过申请公积金减轻负担而被拒,如今公积金局正式发函,拒绝他以医疗为由提取公积金的申请。 本月15日,本社报导沈佳泉因心脏衰竭身体出现状况,接受了手术后,左心室射出率(LVEF)竟只剩下37巴仙的功能,要知道正常人的左心室射出率(LVEF)在55至70巴仙。此外,医生也叮嘱他不能提重物,否则心脏会痛。 尽管经过手术后,沈佳泉也试着过上正常人的生活,尝试开私召车以及其他兼职工作,但因心脏问题,身体无法负荷。2017年,他以全面停工,家里仅靠妻子约1800元的收入过活,加上庞大的医疗费,家庭经济状况拮据。 然而,社会服务办公室认为家里妻子仍有稳定收入,故将拒绝他的申请。 根据公积金局官网指出,公民只有在四种情况下,能透过医疗理由申请提取公积金,即申请者因为丧失身体或心智能力、或寿命严重受损、或永久性缺乏能力、获得了绝症,而无法工作。 另一方面,公积金表示沈佳泉的医师两次鉴定声明证明与当局所邀请的医师,均证实沈佳泉目前的身体确实不适合就业,但仍然可以从事简单不累的工作。 为了能够说服公积金局让他能提取公积金,沈佳泉也去拜访了西海岸集选区议员郑德源寻求协助,郑德源随后也致函公积金委员会调查此案。 尽管郑德源提出上诉,以及沈佳泉不断提出申请,公积金局依然保持不变,拒绝沈佳泉领取公积金。 公积金局信中表示,成员在经医生(无论是政府医院、综合诊所或专科医生)鉴定,无法从事任何工作、寿命严重受损或身患绝症,均可依据MGS计划提取部分公积金储蓄。 然而,由于沈佳泉在经过国家心脏中心医师评估后,证明尽管他不适合就业,但仍然能从事不需耗费体力的工作。 当局邀请了两位医生评估沈佳泉的情况,也得出上述医生的结论,故此不符合以医疗理由领出公积金的条件。…

Did PAP activists break the law in distributing flyers?

By Ariffin Sha A team of activists from the ruling People’s Action…

Increasing number of bids in COE bidding exercise shows high demand for car ownership

By COE SG ChartsThe 2nd COE bidding exercise that ended on 18 March…