Amos Yee
Photo: CNA
Photo: CNA

16-year old blogger, Amos Yee, who was found guilty of the two charges brought against him by the Attorney General’s Chambers on Tuesday, 12 May has made an allegation of molest against his former bailor, Mr Vincent Law.

Amos was found guilty of the charge of obscenity and wounding the feelings of Christians in a YouTube video criticising former prime minister, Lee Kuan Yew.

Amos had said in his facebook page status that reporters have been gathering at his doorstep, seeking exclusive interviews and some photos of him.

In his facebook fanpage, he wrote,

Last night, and even today morning at around 11am, reporters gathered at my doorstep, wanting some exclusive interviews and some photos.

I told them to xxxx off.

But then after awhile, I started to contemplate, is this really…. The right approach in dealing with the mass media? And then I realized… no… it isn’t. It really isn’t.

And I have to admit, though you all might be tabloid creating xxxx….. you are diligent, and I have to say… I admire that.

So you know what… Fine.. Xxxx it! I concede to your requests, xxxx what Roy Ngerng says, you are the mainstream media, you have the responsibility towards the general public to provide news, you deserve information, and regardless of the risk that you guys will misquote me, you deserve the truth.

Therefore, today I have arranged a little meeting with a fellow visual artist I managed to converse with on Facebook, a humble fellow by the name of Dick Ow. And am to meet him at his residence in Pasir Panjang, at 7pm. I am heading to his house to collaborate with him on a few videos, would possibly have a sleepover.

I currently just finished my lunch at Brownice and am heading to Red Hill to run a few video game errands, so I’ll reach Pasir Panjang Mrt at around say… 3-4pm?

He then went on in his post to tempt reporters to turn up at Pasir Panjang MRT station where he will reveal information of how his former bailor, Mr Vincent Law allegedly molested him.

And if all you catch me as I go out of the Pasir Panjang MRT station, we’ll collaborate and find a little miscellaneous area, where we can all gather together, and I’ll clear the air and answer everyone of your queries: What happened in Prison, what my future plans are to fuck with the Government, I’ll even reveal that little tidbit of information on how my ex-bailor, Vincent Law, molested me.

I am reeling in excitement for our meeting, my fellow mass-media friends, I hope to see you there.

vincent law potrait
Mr Vincent Law

Mr Vincent Law, a family counselor, clarifies to TOC that Amos’ allegation against him is false and has no truth whatsoever.

Mr Law had bailed Amos Yee out from police remand on 21 April and subsequently discharged himself as bailor on 30 April, Wednesday.

Mr Law does not want to speculate on the reason why Amos is making such an allegation but clarified that all the meeting that he had with Amos were at public places.

The four occasions took place at Toast Box in Paya Lebar, Coffee and Toast in Cityhall, Citylink Mall, Toast Box at Somerset 313 and the performance for “Public Enemy”.

There were two other occasions where he met Amos at his home. The meetings between him and Amos took place in the presence of his own wife and children.

In the first occasion where Amos went to his home, his wife was there to prepare bread for him while his children chatted with him. While on the second occasion where Amos turned up at his house, his mother, Mary, was there to accompany him.

When asked about his feelings on Amos’ allegations against him, Mr Law said he feels disappointed that Amos has made such irresponsible allegation against him and that Amos did not think through the consequences in making such remarks online.

Amos’ lawyer Alfred Dodwell was quoted by media reports that the post took him by surprise.

“He’s never communicated this to me or my team.”

He added that he was not in a position to comment on the allegation, saying: “My job is with relation to his two charges and these other issues are his personal issues.”

It is uncertain if Amos has met reporters at Pasir Panjang MRT to give any evidence to support his allegation.

So far, no news outlet has reported anything on Amos’ allegation against Mr Law apart from quoting Amos’ facebook status update.

Also no photo nor video from the mainstream media has emerged from the supposed disclosure by Amos at 3pm this afternoon.

Update: Amos has clarified that the molest allegation against Mr Law is an act of “trolling” on the reporters from the Mainstream Media (MSM).

Subscribe
Notify of
75 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Lee Hsien Yang shares photo of late Lee Kuan Yew’s favourite carpet on his father’s fifth death anniversary

On Monday (23 March) morning, Mr Lee Hsien Yang (LHY), younger son…

圣诞老人才是选民心目中挑战执政党的理想人选?

撰文:许渊臣  北雁译 对于我国在野政党,普遍新加坡选民的抱怨都是,这些政党和候选人,都不是他们理想中的政党和政治人物类型。要么是觉得他们做得不够好、格局不够高、不常出现在选区,又或者他们提出的改革体制建议不够实际。 且不论这些选民的抱怨是否属实,让我们先来看看当今新加坡的政治环境。 大部分新加坡人都不会花钱资助那些政治事业或推动改革的政党(即便符合选民期许的改革) 大部分(即便不是全部)新加坡企业都受惠于政联公司或与之有关的机构如职总平价合作社 《经济学人》发表的2016年全球朋党资本主义指数(crony-capitalism index)排名,新加坡位居第四 对于那些被体制惩罚的人,很少有国人伸出援手。更甭论那些在香港、台湾和其他民主国家, 愿意为不公站在一起的公民 对于人民行动党派钱,特别是在大选之年,大部分国民感到感激,即便这些津贴援助,都是来自政府资源,而不是来自政党。 所以,如果选民的抱怨真得有道理,那么他们理想中的政党和政治人物(先不论政治意识形态)应该:…

新加坡超越美国成全球最具竞争力经济体

世界经济论坛昨日(10日)公布全球竞争力报告,新加坡超越美国,成为全球最具竞争力经济体。 世界经济论坛(WEF)去年開始以新的全球竞争评比4.0指标(Global Competitiveness Index 4.0),其指标包括有利环境、人力资本、市场及创新生态系统四大类,再分为12个指标。 今年新加坡得分为84.8分,超越美国的83.7分,其总分为100分。报告指出,新加坡总分共高出了1.3分,也使新加坡超越美国,位居榜首。 世界经济论坛说,我国在基础设施、人民健康平均寿命(共四国名列第一),以及劳动市场方面排名第一;在金融体系、市场效率以及宏观经济稳定方面也取得相当优秀的成绩。 “新加坡原本在不同指标中得分很高,如今再更进一步,比起其他经济合作发展组织(OECD),在每个指标中的得分平均高出4至19分”,报告表示。 制衡和新闻自由方面表现欠佳 不过,在制衡(Checks and balances)方面仅排名23,其中司法独立分项排名14,居首国家为芬兰;新闻自由排名124,居榜首国家为挪威。(截图自2019全球竞争力报告)…

本社申诉要求内政部撤更正指示 高庭保留判决

新加坡内政部于22日援引《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》(POFMA),对于马国捍卫自由律师团(LHL)、《网络公民》、雅虎新闻以及新闻工作者韩俐颖,发出更正指示。 本社已向内政部长尚穆根要求撤回指示,不过被部长驳回,为此本社在上月28日转向高庭上诉。即便准备法庭文件,都需要989元六角的费用,约占了本社运营成本的10巴仙。 高庭申诉定在昨日(6日)进行,高庭暂对本社的申诉,保留判决。 上月16日本社报导,捍卫自由律师团发表一篇新闻稿,指责樟宜监狱以残酷和不合法方式处决囚犯。包括本社、雅虎新闻以及马国主流媒体,都有报导上述律师组织的声明。 本社在申诉中强调,报导中已对资讯作出均衡报导,也强调那是来自上述组织的的第三方指控,且本社亦有向内政部求证,惟未获得后者核实。 本社也强调报导已“谨慎行事”,不少于六次强调那是来自马国律师苏仁德兰的“指控”。引述一方的指控,并向有关当局求证,在媒体编采作业中是常见的。 “例如报导仍在审讯中的诉讼,新闻稿也会涵括对被告的指控,尽管仍未在法庭证实。” 不过总检察署针对本社提呈的辩护宣誓书,则以此前高庭法官洪清福对民主党案例为例,重申更正指示并没有限制当事者的言论自由,例如本社的相关报导仍能继续在网络上人人阅读。 “只有当不遵守指示,当事者才会遭受刑事或罚款惩处。” 法官认为证明消息真假责任在政府 尽管法官此前裁决驳回民主党的申诉,不过他曾认为证明消息真假的责任,应在发布更正指示的部长身上。 法官也质疑,如果政府有更多资源来提供相关证据,那么当初国会是否有意让举证的责任,落在那些发声明者的身上。…