by Foong Swee Fong

This has to take the cake for stating an unfavourable fact favourably.

The Straits Times reported that Singapore residents (citizens and PRs) bought 99% of units sold at the Reserve Residences.

Of the remaining 1%, “three are foreigners from the United States, who are subject to the same additional buyer’s stamp duty (ABSD) rate as Singapore residents under a free trade agreement (FTA)”.

Did you catch the sleight of hand? The phrase should have been: “Unlike other foreigners, US citizens do not need to pay foreign ABSD”, rather than, “being subject to the same ABSD rate as Singapore residents” – Same same, but different.

Many readers, being too busy making a living and therefore not on top of current affairs, will get the impression that US residents being subjected to the same treatment as Singapore residents, as cleverly phrased by the reporter, as being fair, until they remember or realize that foreigners are subject to a 60% ABSD to put a lid on them chasing up property prices.

Of all the countries with whom we have signed Free Trade Agreements, and we have signed 27 to date, only the US-Singapore FTA (USSFTA) and the European FTA (as distinct from the EU-Singapore FTA), exempts it’s residents from paying ABSD.

Thus residents from the US, Switzerland, Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein will thus continue to chase up property prices here.

Just US alone will have enough rich residents to nullify our efforts to rein in foreign speculation.

All it needs is a shrewd marketeer to trumpet the 60% exemption that few foreigners enjoy, to have a piece of real estate in growth-at-all-cost-tiny-and-safe Singapore.

In fact, the number of Americans buying property here has been creeping up the ranks. It was way down the list before the signing of the USSFTA in 2003, but has crept up as ABSD was introduced, and subsequently increased, since they are not subject to it, and thus, perversely, enjoys a huge discount.

It is now in 4th place behind China, Malaysia and India.

The fact is that the clause in the two FTAs exempting the payment of ABSD diminishes our sovereignty, among other clauses, which the ST is trying to gloss over.

They put us at a disadvantage and are unfair to the majority of Singaporeans, and once signed, are extremely difficult to extricate.

This opinion piece was first published by Foong Swee Fong on his Facebook page and reproduced with permission.

Subscribe
Notify of
20 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

The collective threat of RISK countries: How Russia, Iran, Syria, and North Korea endanger world order and peace

by Dr Galyna Kogut As the world rang into the New Year,…

The sameness of cabinet ministers cut from the same cloth, straight from the same assembly line

Augustine Low, a Singaporean commentator, discusses in his latest op-ed how the “degree of training” that Singapore’s leaders go through before moving up the ranks sets them apart from leaders of other countries. However, he points out that to get the full story, we have to ask what purpose this training serves and to what end. According to Low, there is a sameness about the ministers in the cabinet, making it difficult to tell one minister apart from another. They are all cut from the same cloth, straight from the same assembly line, making conformity and groupthink their trademark.

The pitfalls of political blogging vs the pleasantry of travel, food and fashion blogging

About five years ago, in China, prominent online personalities were “invited” to…

Storm over PMDs – Reflections of a motorist, cyclist, pedestrian cum PMD user

by Yee Jenn Jong Personal Mobility Devices (PMDs) have grabbed the headlines…