Attendees at the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) special annual meeting in August will not be required to serve a Stay-Home Notice (SHN), but they will be subject to “rigorous testing arrangements”, said Senior Minister of State for Health Janil Puthucheary in Parliament on Tuesday (16 Feb).

Dr Puthucheary was responding to a question from Member of Parliament (MP) for Sengkang GRC He Ting Ru, who asked whether WEF attendees will be subject to serving SHN period as well as the measures implemented to prevent the gathering from turning into a super-spreader event.

The Minister stated that both local and foreign event attendees will have to undergo rigorous testing arrangements “in lieu of them serving stay-home notices”.

Safe management measures will also be implemented, such as mask-wearing, safe-distancing, and mandating the use of TraceTogether technology to minimize the risk of COVID-19 transmission, said Dr Puthucheary.

“In addition, a physical segregation of event attendees from the local community will reduce the risk of infection spreading from event attendees to local community at large and vice versa,” he added.

Subsequently, Sengkang GRC MP Jamus Lim asked if there are contingency plans in place to deal with a super-spreader event, and how would the public and providers be prepped if it turns into a super-spreader event.

In response, Dr Puthucheary said that Singapore is “already hosting and organizing events” and that the current protocol dealing with COVID-19 cases will be relied upon to deal with any spread of the virus.

“If there was indeed a case of COVID-19 at the WEF special annual meeting, the prevailing measures that we have for a COVID-19 case at any of the events that we are organizing will be in place and all the various measures as well as regulations around contact tracing isolation and subsequent follow-up will be followed,” he explained.

The special annual meeting was initially scheduled on 13 to 16 May this year in Singapore, but this was later pushed back to 25 May until 28 May.

The organization further postponed the meeting to 17 August until 20 August, saying that the change in timing was due to the “international challenges in containing the pandemic”.

Netizens slam Govt for exempting WEF attendees from SHN period, call it “double standards”

Penning their thoughts under the comment section of Mothership‘s Facebook post, many netizens described the Government’s move to exempt WEF’s attendees from SHN period as “double standards”, with some even asking if the attendees have “special immunity” to the COVID-19 virus.

One netizen wrote: “Why no SHN for WEF attendees while the rest of the mere mortals like incoming migrant workers and normal travellers have to be quarantined? Are WEF attendees immune to the virus?”

Another netizen commented that the decision by the Government just shows that “when it comes to profits and fame, people’s lives don’t matter”.

Others reminded the Government not to blame Singapore citizens if the COVID-19 community cases increase.

Subscribe
Notify of
37 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

公民质问:部长是否获全面医疗保险额外待遇?

Simon Lim撰文,林殊译 前几日我在公立医院接受治疗。住院期间,我曾目睹护士们如何24小时无休地工作,也让我重新省思有关医疗人员国籍问题、医疗费用、医疗保险与其他医疗津贴。 有关医疗费用和医疗保险,其中一个想法涌上心头。我确信大家仍记得交通部长许文远过去宣称自己做心脏绕道手术,只需缴付8元的故事。 我也相信大家对他这番言论感到非常不舒服,然而,我是其中一个相信他所说的,也是相信这代表着他或许拥有非常充足的医疗账户(Medisave),抑或是非常全面的医疗保险。 如果许文远是透过自己购买的医疗保险来支付的话,我会恭喜他,也会为他送上祝福。 不过,我有个疑问。 我不知道如果人民行动党的部长们,是否拥有全面医疗保险作为他们的额外待遇?两周前,我向民情联系组(REACH)提出我的问题,也得到他们回复,已将问题向相关单位寄出,但截至今日,我仍未收到任何回复。 如果人民行动党的部长们真得有享有全面的医疗保险保障,那就必须停止!我必须强烈谴责。为什么?容我解释。为符合裸薪(clean wage)需求,就连开车到学校上班的老师,都要缴停车费用。我们的部长领着让其他经合组织(OECD)国家都羡慕的高薪,而这些薪水是由我们人民支付给他的。 新加坡人理应有基本的认知、骨气和纪律,不应允许任何政党的政部长,私有这些福利,成本却由由群众共担(privatise the…

向女友求欢不成竟暴力相向 医生面五控状

向女友求欢不成恼羞成怒,医生抡起拳头打人,甚至按着她的头撞墙,还禁锢她不让她回家,一直到警察找上门后才罢休,被控蓄意重伤他人、非法禁锢等五项罪状。 身为一名代班家庭医生的被告张顺杰(35岁),昨日(11月4日)在国家法院面控,主要以蓄意重伤罪和非法禁锢罪进行审讯,其余的三项罪状暂时搁置,其中包括受害者曾经三次于2017年3月遭被告施暴后,报警备案。 他被控于2017年8月27日凌晨4时12分,在红山弄的一个组屋单位内,即在被告的住家中,对其前女友林恩慧(27岁)施暴。 据控方的开庭陈词指出,被告父亲当天听到被告和受害者的争吵声,因此报警求助。警方抵达现场时现要求被告开门,但是被告拒绝后,警方就破门而入。警方指出,当时只见被告和受害者在房中,受害者当时坐在一个角落哭泣,满脸鲜血且脸青鼻肿,而被告躺在床上,身上只穿着四角裤。 警方随后将被告逮捕,并将受害者送进医院。 蓄意重伤罪状指被告在案发时,多次拳打受害者,并按着她的头去撞墙,导致她脸部多处骨折,且手尾指骨折;而非法禁锢受害者,则是指他锁住房门,阻止受害者离开回家。 被告皆不承认这两项控状,并表示他在案发当时已经喝醉了,不记得发生了什么事情,也请陈其玉律师进行抗辩。 在昨日开审中,受害者率先供证,指两人是在2017年2月,透过交友应用程序认识,随后发展成为恋人,但是在案发后已经分手了。 她指出,两人在案发前一晚曾到卡拉OK和两家夜店拍拖,且都点了酒精饮料,一直到凌晨2时才回到被告住家。 她表示,当时被告曾两次向她求欢,但是都被拒绝了,她甚至想要离开房间避开,却因此激怒被告,将她拉回房间锁上门后,就开始对她施暴,甚至按着她的头去撞墙。 期间,辩方律师曾指出,受害者在回家路上曾对被告作出性暗示,还在车上为其口交,但是受害者中指出,两人只是在停车场,当被告停好车后才发生了关系,并没有在对方开车时帮他口交。 率先到场的两名警员在供证时表示,他们抵达现场时,被告父亲告知被告和受害者在房中争吵,他们当时曾先敲门,要求对方开门。但是在听到一名女子的求救声后,就决定破门入室。…

Housing Grants – Do They Really Help Singaporeans?

By Edmund Lim – With reference to Grant for Low-Income Housholds Enhanced,…