On Monday (23 November) it was announced that Singaporeans can begin redeeming their S$100 SingapoRediscovers vouchers starting 1 December online via authorised booking platforms, namely Change Travel Service, GlobalTix, Klook, Traveloka, and Trip.com.

The above platforms feature a range of activities that people can choose to spend their vouchers on from staycation packages to heritage tours.

Redeeming the vouchers requires SingPass at the point of checkout.

The vouchers can be redeemed at S$10 denominations.

However, there are certain terms and services to the vouchers, said the Singapore Tourism Board (STB).

Most notably, the vouchers cannot be combined with others for a single purchase. This means that a family cannot combine each individual voucher to book, for example, a single hotel stay.

The vouchers also cannot be sold or transferred to others.

STB said that this is designed to encourage Singaporeans to support as many tourism businesses as possible.

When asked by they chose to use booking platforms as a means of redeeming vouchers rather than working directly with merchants, TODAY reported STF as saying that this was the fastest, easiest, and safest way to get as many merchants involved as possible, owing to the fact that some businesses, especially smaller ones, do not have their own online booking system for patrons.

Netizens commenting on TODAY‘s Facebook page, however, were less than thrilled about not being able to stack or combine vouchers.

They opined that the government should not expect people to spend the vouchers on staycations and hotel stays if they cannot stack vouchers.

Several people pointed out that hotels have probably hiked up their rates now, rendering the vouchers moot.

A few people suggested calling them “discount vouchers” instead.

One person even said that it would be better to offer S$100 discounts for various hotel rooms and attractions instead of handing out vouchers.

One person said it was “stupid” to not allow at least family members to combine their tickets, while another wondered why the state is “afraid” of people using the vouchers that are meant to help the tourism industry.

One person suggested the S$100 vouchers be left open for people to spend on what they want or need, noting that it is not currently convenient for many people who have to fork out some of their own money to be able to use the vouchers.

At least one person expressed a more measured reaction, stating that the inability to combine vouchers means a loss for the hotel industry, as many people might not opt to use their vouchers on staycations.

The commenter then went on to say that the “government doesn’t want us to spend it all on staycations”, adding that those who could afford to top up the voucher should do it, while others can opt for more affordable attractions like trips to the zoo.

Subscribe
Notify of
22 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

杨莉明发律师信 网民Donald Liew 道歉

昨日(20日),人力部长杨莉明以个人名义透过律师信,要求社运份子范国瀚以及名为Donald Liew的人士,撤回有关指责她与丈夫涉嫌从设立社区护理设施牟利的言论。 据了解,今日上午Donald Liew已在脸书作出毫无保留道歉,也删除早前贴文,承认有关指控不实。不过,范国瀚至截稿为止仍未有针对此事,作出声明。 杨莉明在律师信的声明中澄清,有关项目是由盛裕控股集团,与卫生部和国家发展部直接洽谈。 “我与我的丈夫都未曾参与有关项目的授权或金钱交易”。因此,她反驳早前有关牟取暴利和贪污的指控是不实的。 另一方面,卫生部和国家发展部也发表联合文告,驳斥有关指控。 文告称,淡马锡接下任务时同意,该集团和相关公司,将以成本价或低于成本的价格完成任务,不会从中牟利。而淡马锡在确认了博览中心这个地点后,就要求盛裕集团协助,设立社区护理设施。 至于杨莉明表示,若对方撤回指控并道歉,自己无意继续追究此事或要求赔偿。与此同时,也要求上述二人捐赠1000元,给客工援助基金。

Loy York Jiun appointed as new CASE Executive Director

The Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE) has appointed Mr Loy York Jiun…

Singapore custom arrested duo allegedly dealing with duty-unpaid cigarettes

Singapore Customs (SC) issued a press release which announced the arresting of…

TOC Analysis: PM’s gambit is manufactured dissent par excellence

If anything has changed, it has changed for the worse. Choo Zheng Xi & Khairulanwar Zaini.