Image from Lectress Pat’s Facebook page

According to Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA), six men and one woman will be charged in court on 2 June for breaching safe distancing measures at Robertson Quay on 16 May.
These seven individuals will be charged under the Covid-19 (Temporary Measures) (Control Order) Regulations 2020.
Earlier on 16 May, Facebook user Lectress Pat posted a series of photos showing crowds of people gathering around Robertson Quay, noting that no enforcer was seen patrolling the area when the photos were being taken at around 6.25pm.
Some individuals were spotted not wearing a face mask in the photos, while others were seen sitting near to each other without social distancing. The photos have since gone viral on social media.

Following that, URA stated on 17 May that it has ordered the restaurants at Robertson Quay to cease the sale of takeaway alcohol immediately.
In response to the incident, Minister for the Environment and Water Resources Masagos Zulkifli confirmed in a Facebook post on 18 May to affirm that the URA officers have been patrolling the area. He noted that a number of the individuals who gathered in the area have been traced by the police.
“These persons are non-Singaporeans, and are currently under police investigation,” he wrote.
Although Mr Masagos had stated that the police have tracked down the individuals who gathered at Robertson Quay and that they are non-Singaporeans, no clarification was given on whether these individuals have faced any punishments.
This has led many netizens to question why foreigners get “double standard” treatment by the authorities as compared to migrant workers or Singaporeans who failed to comply with the safe distancing measures.
Following URA’s announcement today, Mr Masagos wrote on his Facebook page, saying: “We take such breaches very seriously and will not hesitate to take action. My thanks to Urban Redevelopment Authority and the Singapore Police Force for pursuing the violations.”
He added that while there has been a decreasing trend in the number of community transmissions, Singapore must remain vigilant to curb the spread of COVID-19.
“When we exit the Circuit Breaker on 2 June, some restrictions will be lifted, and more of us will come into contact with one another. It will be more critical than ever to practise safe distancing. Remember, these measures are in place to protect us and our loved ones.” said Mr Masagos and reminded people to stay home as far as possible.
“Wear a mask and keep a distance of at least 1 metre from the next person when you go out. Stay safe everyone.”
Singapore DJ Jade Rasif previously noted on her Facebook page that the incident at Robertson Quay is not uncommon.
She noted in a Facebook post on 16 May,

I live in Bukit Timah, and from personal experience, in Bukit Timah / Alexandria/Robertson Quay, there are families gathering outside bars and groups of friends chatting. You can even see people drinking at bars, who conveniently leave tables out. Yet I have never seen an enforcement officer anywhere.
However, when I’m in Ang Mo Kio (I take my son to see his paediatrician there), I always see 3-4 social distancing ambassadors patrolling the same spot each time. Same case whenever I get groceries. Officers are everywhere around the heartlands ready to hand out fines. Is this a coincidence? Maybe.

Subscribe
Notify of
16 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

讥公积金局含糊其辞 网民:何不65岁自动入息?

近期,有网民转载分享,一名即将迎来65岁生日的公积金会员,收到了公积金局的来信。信函通知他,如有意在65岁就开始提取存款,就必须另行通知当局,否则,就要等到70岁才能开始提款。 信函中表示,若该会员选择推迟领取,就能享有更长的领取期,或每月更高的入息。 信中也用黑体强调: “如果你想要在70岁才开始领取入息,你什么都不用做。” 对此,许多网民质疑当局把公积金退休存款计划领取入息的年龄,悄悄推迟到70岁。 公积金局在本月19日于脸书发文澄清,表示会员仍是在65岁可开始领取入息,政策未变。 不过公积金局也强调,国人仍须提出领取入息的申请。如果没有提出申请,当局只会在会员满70岁时,才开始自动每月发放入息。 公积金局指出,1954年出生的会员,领取入息年龄仍是65岁,这个政策在2007年公布,至今没有改变。 会员到了符合年龄后,会收到公积金局信函,通知他们需填写申请表格,或网上申请以启动领取入息。 网民吁65岁自动入息简化程序 对于公积金局的解释,一些网民认为公积金局只不过重复了群众已知的事实,人民要知道,为何自动入息非得要推迟到70岁,而不是65岁? 网民Serene…

【选举】前进党公布最后一批准候选人 包括印裔女中豪杰

新加坡前进党今日(26日)公布最后一批准候选人,与此同时也宣布在本届选举有意上阵的四个集选区和五个单选区。 这是该党公布的第四批准候选人,就包括该党助理秘书长梁文辉。他曾在政府投资公司任职、在美林证券(香港)担任高职、华侨证券任董事经理等,在投资界有30多年经验,成功将100多家企业在新加坡交易所,香港联交所及其他亚洲股市上市。 梁文辉表示,本身有意为新加坡推动新的经济策略,为本地任提供更多就业机会和商机,并减缓国人的经济负担。 准候选人中还包括一名“女中豪杰”,52岁的卡拉(Kala Manickam)曾是一名军官,在军中服务长达七年,后转入私人领域协助设立在职培训中心,在人力资源领域有26年经验。 她呼吁国家应奠立透明、问责和独立的基础,倡议生活成本、就业、政治和教育的平等。 68岁的阿都拉曼,早期曾担任消防人员,也涉及富士施乐大厦(原称IBM大厦)和马可波罗酒店的设计,目前专注在防火和安全的审计和设计。他倡议协助25万活在贫穷线下的居民,逃出贫困循环。 51岁邱宝忠,国立大学毕业,是植物学家,目前在跨国企业保险领域任营销总监。他关注国内中年专才的前景。 而29岁的孙俊伟,则是一名飞机师,此前还曾经营自己的私人飞行生意,也倡议让年轻人有机会创一番事业。 至于财务咨询师林志鸿,则曾在关爱乐龄办事处,与年长者共事,领导义工为年长者提供协助。  

印尼选举20万败选者 恐陷入负债、身心压力

印尼于4月17日迎来最大规模的选举,超過24万5000名候选人角逐议席,但选举尘埃落定后,也意味着有将近20万人会败选,使得他们失去工作及背上庞大债务。 身心俱疲,生活上面临极大的压力,这些败选者可能寻求宗教及医疗治疗,抚慰心灵。 在印尼,候选人在竞选期间需自行负担竞选开销,并未获得财务支援。然而,在投入大量金钱与时间后,却未必能如预期获胜,以致他们陷入败选及面临庞大债务的窘境。 压力不堪负荷,靠宗教求慰籍 候选人之一的阿都拉曼(Yayat Abdurahman译音)说道:“一开始时,我是保持乐观及有信心的,我一直认为我必须在这场竞选中获得更多的票数赢得席位,但后来,我开始疑惑了(是否参选)。” 如同其他败选者,他并未在这场竞选中获得胜选。 位于西爪哇的井里汶市,以伊斯兰信仰为主的治疗中心(Islamic Healing Centre),也是许多败选人士寻求慰籍之地。主任乌江(Ujang Busthomi)指出,这些人都经历了巨大压力,甚至失眠,因为他们已经负债,对于未来需要偿还的债务不知所措。 治疗期间,会由中心的神职人员会有净化仪式,为他们淋上浸泡花朵的圣水,祈求未来顺利平安。…

【选举】人力部、卫生部联合发出五则更正指示!

指责民主党主席、传染病学教授淡马亚的言论有不实之处,卫生部和人力部,透过“防假消息法”办公处,对包括主流媒体在内的单位,发出多达五则更正指示! 接到更正指示的单位包括:亚洲新闻台(CNA)、国立大学协会(NUSS)、网络公民和新叙事(New Naratif),这也是首次有主流媒体接到指示。 至于被指含有“不实陈述”的短片,包括国立大学协会(NUSS)在本月3日发布的短片、本社在4日发布的脸书贴文和短片、本社的网络直播、亚洲新闻台的文章和新叙事的音频。 联合声明中指出,淡马亚指责人力部,未咨询医疗专家意见下,劝阻雇主带工人做冠病检测等。文告解释,卫生部是在2月初,接到本地医院的通知,指有雇主带工人到医院急诊部,作冠病检测。 为此,卫生部、人力部等政府部门,在2月12日和19日发文,劝请雇主不要带健康员工到医院检测,让医疗设施用来照顾身体不适病人。 文告也强调人力部并没有劝阻雇主带工人做测试,而是除非是病危状况,否则若工友身体不适,应送工友先看全科医生,由医生来审核病人是否需送医院做检测。