Starting this Wednesday (20 May), employers will be benefit from an easier method to transfer their domestic helpers to other households, thanks to new rules launched by the Ministry of Manpower (MOM).
Given the current COVID-19 pandemic, many countries around the globe have imposed strict travel restrictions resulting in a limitation on the number of migrant domestic workers coming into Singapore.
However, with these new rules, employment agencies can soon help employers terminate the contract of a migrant domestic helper’s work permit even though she does not have a new employer.
When the helper’s permit is cancelled, she will be issued a 14-day Special Pass. Within this time frame, if the domestic helper is not secured with another employer, the agency will bear the cost of repatriating the worker.
During the unemployment period, the agent will also take care of the worker’s accommodation, food and medical insurance.
This new arrangement helps employers tremendously as the current regulation makes it compulsory for the ex-employer to bear the cost of the worker’s living expenses during the transition period even if she has already returned to the employment agency. If that’s not all, the former employer must also provide a letter of consent for the new work permit application.
The former boss must also pay for the domestic helper’s trip to her home country if her work permit is cancelled and she is not able to get a new employment with another household.
MOM said that employment agencies which would like to take over the responsibilities of caring for migrant domestic workers during the 14-day transition period should register with the Ministry by end of this month (31 May), adding that a list of participating agencies will be made public online.

AEAS questions the new rules

In response to these new rules, the Association of Employment Agencies (AEAS), which represents 300 agencies that supplies over 75 percent of domestic workers in Singapore, questions the objective of this new added rules.
The president of AEAS, K Jayaprema, told Channel News Asia (CNA): “We do not understand the objective of this policy, especially at this juncture. Even if you look at the current situation, employers do transfer domestic workers through employment agencies. There are existing agreements between employers and agencies … it is something that is ongoing.”
She added, “It looks like there’s no consideration that is being given to the interests or the thoughts of the domestic worker herself.”
This is because she explained that the affected domestic workers might not even be given the chance to say if she would want to be transferred to another employer.
“It looks like it’s a deal that is being made between the employer and the agencies. It is all being monetised, and whoever can bear the costs makes that decision about transferring the domestic worker.”
If that’s not all, Ms Jayaprema also pointed out that the 14-day transition period is too short, adding that the majority of the current service agreements between employment agencies and employers give a 21-day transition period and a 7-day extension where applicable.
“We are looking at interviewing and understanding the domestic worker, putting her up on any kind of a platform, facilitating interviews, ensuring that both the employer and the domestic worker can agree on employment terms,” she said.
“Sometimes after we have gone through the whole process the domestic worker changes her mind. She might have some other offer from elsewhere. So if for whatever reason if she changes her mind and we are not able to find another suitable employer within those 14 days, then the agency is going to be disadvantaged. Definitely, 14 days is not enough to do a transfer.”
With these new regulations, the cost of hiring domestic workers may also increase as agencies have other additional costs to pay for.
“The employment agencies are expected to buy insurance. In the past, the insurance was under the current employer, so we don’t have to incur the additional cost of another insurance policy,” she said.
“All this is going to be factored in and all that is actually going to cause the agency fee to go up.”

HOME highlighted issues faced by migrant domestic workers​​​​​​​

In a recent statement released by the Human Organisation of Migration Economic (HOME), it highlighted a number of issues faced by migrant domestic workers in Singapore. One issue is the termination of a worker’s employment and inability to return to their home countries due to travel restrictions imposed due to COVID-19. Some of these workers are unsure if they can return back to their hometowns even if they’re repatriated because of the internal lockdowns and limitation on domestic travel imposed by their own government.
To make it worse, some workers told the organisation that they are not sure if their employers have terminated their work permits and are scared that they will overstay in Singapore without proper documentation.
“HOME has heard accounts from Migrant Domestic Workers (MDWs) whose applications for a new work permit have been rejected, despite multiple appeals,” it said.
It added, “Employment agencies have told HOME that applications by Singaporeans and permanent residents, as well as prospective employers who are eligible for levy concession (i.e. live with a child below 16 years old, elderly person who is at least 67 years old or person with disabilities) are prioritised.”
TOC has reached out to HOME to find out their comments on the new regulations by MOM and is yet to receive a reply.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

新加坡前进党 正式获社团注册局批准

前行动党议员陈清木医生,申请成立的新加坡前进党(Progress Singapore Party),已获得社团注册局正式批准。 根据社团注册局网站,陈清木申请注册的新政党,是在3月28日正式注册。预料该党将在本周对外作出正式公布。 陈清木在今年1月16日,和12名志同道合新加坡人(包括几位前人民行动党干部),向社团注册局申请注册新加坡前进党。 去年12月31日,陈清木既已表示“挂起听筒”,正式结束50年的行医生涯,有意“从服务病人到服务人民”,“国家和人民福祉将是他的优先使命”。 他表示积极和社区互动,交谈中我聆听了国人的心声、大家的忧虑与难言之隐。陈清木认为自己有责任重返国会为民请命。 他也透露,本身已研究了各种方案,如加入其他政党、或是接管一个已经存在的政党,甚至当一名独立人士。但经过深思熟虑,认为应成立新政党,并且乐意与优先视国家和人民利益大于党及个人、理念相近的反对党合作。 “我已78岁了,只有很短的时间去培养有心从政,为国为民的未来国会议员。我们要维护一个真民主,正确价值观,以民为本的新加坡,而且必须保持自由选择及无畏发言的精神。” 陈清木表示,希望大家能给将成立的新加坡前进党一个机会,成为国会里的新声音。

Grab puts an end to its “commute” and “all-access” subscription plans

Technology company Grab has announced that it will be putting an end…

维权组织指大华银行 借贷予涉破坏热带雨林马财团

大华银行(UOB)被指参与资助一家私人公司,在邻国马来西亚砂拉越姆鲁山国家公园附近进行破坏,开发油棕园以满足西方消费者的需求。 此消息是由布诺曼梳基金会(Bruno Manser Fonds)于脸书公开一部名为《争取守护姆鲁山》(原名:The Mulu Land Grab)而曝光。 布诺曼梳基金会是瑞士非政府组织,旨在捍卫热带雨林与当地原住民的权益。 该地是姆鲁山国家公园的一部分,也是部分稀有物种的栖息地。由于姆鲁山国家公园的特殊地理位置与有着相当多元的花草树木,该国家公园含附近的地域于2000年由联合国教科文组织UNESCO列为“世界自然遗产”名录。 除了丰富的野生生态,姆鲁山国家公园亦是当地原住民本南族(Penan)与柏拉旺族(Berawan)世代所生活的家,他们的基本生活需求与主要粮食均源于那片森林。 “这片森林之所以对我们如此重要是因为我们本南人本就依靠他生活。我们会在这取药,我们会把西米椰子当作粮食;同时,我们会取藤树做手工艺维持生活。如果森林被破坏了,等同于破坏了我们生活的方式与寻找粮食的途径,这攸关我们的生活与财产。”一名本南村的居民,罗瑟蒂说道。 指公司涉使用有害农药…

组屋消防栓被锁、不出水 穆仁理发文解释并致歉

组屋消防栓被锁,要救火时水管喷不出水,对此民防部队在本月8日,向裕廊-金文泰市镇理事会,发出“消除火患隐忧通知书”(Fire Hazard Abatement Notice)。 有关市镇会在本月13日回应《亚洲新闻台》,澄清有关消防栓刚在上月中旬被检查,被鉴定操作正常。 事缘本月1日,武吉巴督21街的第210A组屋一单位发生火患,民防部队人员赶赴救火,却发现火患现场附近好几个消防栓都被锁头锁住;即便撬开其中一个消防栓,水管根本喷不出水! 至于武吉巴督单选区议员穆仁理,昨日在脸书发声明,承认上述市镇会接到民防部队的通知书;也指作为民选代议士,“政治上需对居民负责”( politically accountable)。“这些事件不该发生,我必须道歉。我将与我的民选与受委市镇会同仁检讨此事,并保障加强消防安全系统的可靠。” 在帖文中他指出,实际上火灾当天他都有在现场,惟当时自己专注在如何协助火灾灾黎,并感谢协助疏散的居民。 他表示当时民防部队人员就已向他反映组屋第13楼消防栓的问题,本身关注此事也要求民防人员彻查。他解释由于火患烧毁13楼的水管,导致14和15楼居民没水上厕所、抽水等,当时自己也忙于协助其他受影响居民。 穆仁理提到负责维护消防栓的承包商是JKeart公司,后者坚称水管是有水用的,也向市镇会展示,在火灾同一天他们对水管进行测试的视频;不过在会见和咨询民防官员后,市镇会决定接受民防部队发表的声明。 市镇官员锁消防栓防滥用…