As the international media continues to cover Singapore’s fall from grace in relation to its management of the COVID-19 pandemic, Minister for Manpower, Josephine Teo has been quoted by the BBC as saying the following:

There are in Southeast Asia alone about 10 million migrant workers. A fraction of them in Singapore. We’re not perfect but we do what we can….Yes, we took some safe distancing measures within the dormitories and if we were to be able to rewind the clock, one could say that these safe distancing measures needed to go much further.”

The question that remains to be answered is – Have they really done what they can? Given that the first case in a dormitory was reported in the first half of February and no action was taken – a case could be made that they have definitely not done all they can.
Anyone that does not know that our migrant workers live in very close proximity with each other is wilfully blind. Surely the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) (Teo’s domain) must have known how they live? It is also common sense that viruses transmit through proximity. Put two and two together, have the government really done all they can?
The constant stream of instructions and regulations coming hard and fast have also led some to comment that our government policies have not displayed foresight or been proactive. Rather, they have seemed knee jerked, reactive and somewhat hap hazard.
Based on the Facebook post of a migrant worker employer, it would appear that even the best efforts of a responsible employer are being hampered by the seemingly bipolar actions of the MOM.
In a heartfelt and frustrated post, Benjamin Lin cited an example of how his attempts to rehouse his workers in a bid to stop the spread of the virus were thwarted by the ever changing policies of the MOM without regard for logistical realities.
This does not appear to be a sign of a ministry that has the situation under control. Perhaps, they need to pause, observe and strategise before appearing to issue ever changing directives a mile a minute?
From a longer term perspective and perhaps to prevent future knee jerk reactions, the MOM may need to relook the entire system that governs how we treat and regard our migrant workers.
In the same article, the BBC  commented that the poor living condition in worker dormitories is a systemic problem that won’t change until the entire system does.
It further stated that “the pandemic has brought to the surface the flaws in Singapore’s society and it was the failure to address these cracks that now threatens even their best laid plan,”
A long term view may go a long way to alleviate future risks from being caught off guard.

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

会见人民活动本周可恢复

环境局在昨日(9日)宣布,会见人民活动在做好防疫措施的前提下可恢复,且人数减少至50人。 自阻断措施4月落实以来,面对面约谈的会见人民活动(MPS)仍不被允许,议员大多呼吁民众改以电话或电邮方式联系。直到今日(10日)当局才进一步放宽措施。 对此,阿裕尼集选区议员严燕松,也发文宣布将在本周三(12日)恢复会见选民活动,不过会将优先服务对冠病风险较高的年长者。活动也将有15名志工协助工作, 并做好防疫措施,包括佩戴面罩。 优先服务年长者,也是确保他们有管道能向议员反映他们的问题。 与此同时,为减少活动的人流量,严燕松呼吁会用电子设备的居民,仍可继续透过线上方式如WhatsApp或电邮方式联系。

Police arrests three men after altercation at Redhill Close; video circulating online

A video has been circulating around social media showing three men in…

Red Dot United gaining momentum with campaign for Jurong GRC

Red Dot United (RDU) connected with constituents of Jurong Group Representation Constituency…

革新党杨耀辉指年轻律师涉私生活不检 律师事务所:已展开调查

革新党成员律师杨耀辉控诉,时尚博主丈夫英穆兰(Imran Rahim)涉嫌性相关不当行为(Sexual misconduct),目前所属律师事务所正展开调查。 杨耀辉本周二(21日)透过社交媒体Instagram,控诉英穆兰利用年轻辩论者和实习生,试图以不正当的目的接近他们,但并没有详细阐述,或提供其他证据佐证。 翌日,他再次在社交媒体上发布视频指,“受英穆兰所害的受害者站出来,如果他真的起诉我,就站出来提供我证据。” 他也指出,自己并不害怕英穆兰,只要一收到令状,便将立即告知媒体,给所有媒体人发电邮。 英穆兰如今是时尚博主Andrea Chong丈夫,今年三月结为连理。Andrea Chong为我国知名时尚博主,在社交媒体上拥有逾30万名粉丝。 目前英穆兰所属的陈国洸律师事务所向《今日报》证实这些指控确实流传于社交媒体,因此会认真看待职员道德、社会与专业标准的所有指控。因此,事务所已展开调查,并强调对于性相关不当行为秉持着零容忍政策。 发言人指出,英穆兰自4月初就开始居家办公,而他如今也同意放缺席假。公司也已经在星期三向职员们沟通此事,告知管理层已经展开调查。 对此,英穆兰回应自己并不认识杨耀辉,因此不理解为何要针对他作出人身攻击。…