Image of cigarette in man hand with smoke from Shutterstock.com

On Sunday (7 April), a man claimed that he was fined S$200 for smoking in the designated smoking area in Orchard Road, merely because he had one foot outside of the box.

The smoker by the name Apiz Mikaelson took to his Facebook to highlight this incident as he did not know that he would be fined as he still had one foot within the delineated yellow box for smoking.

 

In his post, Apiz wrote,

“Share this post, dont give more money to those assholes. So I barely go to Orchard road. Maybe once or twice a year or less. I just Ord-ed bout a month+ ago, I know theres this new law, the no smoking implementation whereby youve to smoke in designated areas blah3. That I know. But what I DIDNT know was that you could be fined for having the other foot out of the yellow box. Told the clown okay Ill move inside cause I legitly didnt know, but the asshat didnt wanna take no for an answer. Probably didnt hit the quota today. What a joke. Do share this around, dont give any more money to these fools and be really careful where you smoke, theyre everywhere ”

At the time of writing, the man’s Facebook account has been deactivated, however, the content of his post and the picture of his summon were shared by online sharing platform, Lion City Feed.

According to the World of Buzz, the man was actually a Malaysian, and he was fined by an auxiliary police officer who did not give him the chance to put his leg back into the smoking zone. Therefore, he took a picture of his ticket and shared it online as a reminder to the public on how strict the lurking officers are.

It appeared that the National Environment Agency (NEA) noted that the man was indeed outside of the smoking area, based on its investigations and video footage.

NEA told The Straits Times (ST) that it has investigated the event, reviewed the case and was pleased with the actions taken by its enforcement officers as they were appropriate and followed its standard operating procedures.

“Our officers had observed the male subject smoking outside of the designated smoking area and approached him, and he was cooperative throughout the engagement,” said NEA’s spokesman.

They also added that video footage did show that the man was smoking outside the designated smoking area, hence was issued the fine.

From 1 April, Orchard Road has been transformed into a no-smoking zone, and actions will be taken against smokers who are seen holding a lit cigarette or smoking outside a designated smoking area.

NEA said that in case of not having sufficient space to smoke in the designated area, smokers are advised to wait until there is enough space to move in, or head to the next nearest designated smoking area.

On social media, netizens complained about the officers’ inflexibility to fine the man despite having his one foot inside the box. They mentioned that the officers could have just advised him to put his one foot back inside the box, and only fine him if he refuses to listen to their advice.

However, others felt that it was the smoker’s fault for testing the system as he should have kept his both feet inside the box if he wants to smoke in Orchard Road. Some opined that smoking should be banned or people should quit smoking altogether to solve this problem.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

耶鲁-国大学院腰斩异议课程 耶鲁大学调查称未受政府干涉

日前耶鲁-国大学院取消《新加坡的异议与抵抗》的课程一事,美国耶鲁大学对此展开调查,昨日(1日)耶鲁调查公布调查结果表示,取消决定均由校方内部决定,并无受到政府干涉。 耶鲁大学校长苏必德教授(Peter Solovey)日前委任环球策略副院长佩里克莱斯·鲁维思教授(Pericles Lewis)调查此事,鲁维斯也与相关人员会面,包括耶鲁—国大教员以及原本负责策划课程的亚菲言(Alfian Sa’at)会面,了解来龙去脉,表示课程没有影响学术自由与开放审视,取消课程是考虑到学术要求和法律问题 “在我看来,这(决定)并没有侵犯学院内任何人的学术自由。“,鲁维斯表示。 上月,耶鲁—国大学院临时取消一门名为《新加坡的异议与抵抗》的课程。有关课程将由新加坡知名剧作家亚菲言(Alfian Sa’at),与参与学生探讨本土的公民抗命模式。原计划于本月本月27日至10月5日进行,结果在开课前两周就却被喊停。 对此,耶鲁—国大学院校长陈大荣教授解释,课程“未批判性地接触多元观点,这对于探讨围绕在异议周边的政治、社会和伦理议题,去做作妥当的学术检视是需要的”。 而耶鲁一些教职员则认为,可能已侵犯学术自由与公开言论,而取消课程的行为可能隐含侵犯言论自由的意义。 据悉,该课程曾在5月31日获得初步批准,但后来因担心该课程有可能违反法律或不符合学术标准。对此,他们称已要求亚菲言修改教案,但一直没能联系上亚菲言,直到两个月后。但亚菲言则表示,并未接受校方到“清楚的指示”,如何处理相关课题。 鲁维斯阐明,尽管耶鲁-国大学院已说明理由,但课程委员应更积极参与,并提早进行风险评估,例如,不应该在8月14日未获得官方批准前,就事先宣布课程。报告也指出,关于外籍学生参加学生可能会面临的后果。他举例,如课程计划在芳林公园“模拟”一场示威可能导致外籍学生触法。…

 RC chairman tells resident to “be tolerant” of RC karaoke noise

In a letter to the Straits Times on Wednesday, Ms Sek Hwee…

A 39-year-old man arrested for loanshark harrasment

The Singapore Police Force (SPF) announced that it had arrested a 39-year-old…

The Baby Isaac Story

by: Elliot Aruldoss and Jewel Philemon/ Three year old Mohamed Isaac made waves…