Johor Bahru Chief Minister Osman Sapian and Malaysian government officials aboard the MV Pedoman on 9 Jan. Source: Osman Sapian/Facebook

Following Johor Chief Minister Osman Sapian’s controversial visit to the Johor Bahru port on board of Malaysian vessel MV Pedoman earlier this month, Malaysia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs revealed that it has advised the Chief Minister to withdraw his plans to visit the port.

The visit, which was deemed by Singapore’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs as an “unauthorised visit” to the vessel that was “anchored illegally in Singapore Territorial Waters off Tuas”, was “a provocative act” that “went against the spirit of the agreement reached a day earlier by Singapore’s Minister for Foreign Affairs Dr Vivian Balakrishnan and his Malaysian counterpart, Dato’ Saifuddin Abdullah, to resolve bilateral issues in a calm and constructive manner”.

In a statement on Friday (18 Jan), Malaysia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated that “it wishes to set the record straight” regarding the contentious issue, and that “upon learning of the planned visit from a Malaysian enforcement agency on the morning of 9 January itself, Ministry officials, under the advice of the Foreign Minister, immediately and repeatedly contacted the Chief Minister’s office and conveyed a message not to proceed with the visit”.

“The Ministry,” it added, “was concerned that such a visit would be counter-productive after the positive and constructive outcome of the bilateral meetings between the Foreign Minister and the Foreign Minister of Singapore just the day before”.

“On 8 January, both Ministers agreed to establish a working group that will study and discuss the legal and operational matters in order to de-escalate the situation on the ground, and to provide a basis for further discussions and negotiations.

However, said Wisma Putra, “the Chief Minister at the time was already onboard a vessel” when contacted and was already “heading towards the Johor Bahru port”.

This led to the Foreign Ministry receiving “a Diplomatic Note from Singapore dated 11 January 2019 protesting his actions, and consequently postponing the 14th meeting of the Joint Ministerial Committee for Iskandar Malaysia (JMCIM), originally scheduled for Monday, 14 January 2019”.

“Regardless of these recent developments, the Ministry wishes to concentrate its efforts on the working group and looks forward to hosting the first meeting at the end of this month, a testament of its commitment to strengthen bilateral relations with Singapore based on equality and mutual respect,” Wisma Putra concluded.

Previously on Sunday (13 Jan), Dato’ Osman defended his visit to the Johor Bahru port, stating on Facebook that “the Singapore government was ‘simply giving an excuse to postpone the upcoming 14th annual meeting of the Joint Ministerial Committee for Iskandar Malaysia (JMCIM)” between the two nations.

Bernama also quoted him as saying that he “had no intention to provoke or to trespass”.

“We can show the plan. The Foreign Minister and Deputy Minister contacted me to ask why I wanted to go. I said if I didn’t, then people will say the MB is not doing anything,” he added.

His defence garnered flak from Malaysians, seeing that it is reasonable for Singapore to interpret his visit as an act of “provocation” in the midst of a delicate and precarious series of negotiations between Malaysia and the Republic:

Social media page SMRT Feedback by The Vigilanteh – which exposed Li Shengwu’s private Facebook post that led to the Attorney-General Chambers prosecution against him – also chimed in with its own take on Dato’ Osman’s statement:

[SMRT Feedback by The Vigilanteh: Osman, why are you finding excuses to blame Singapore? Wasn’t it your boss in Putrajaya who told you not to make the visit, but you went anyway? Now the meeting has been postponed because of you. This meeting is good for the economies of the people of both Singapore and Johor. But you went and sabotaged it. 

[Malay proverb] Whoever eats the chilli, he will bear the heat. It’s not good to slander, you know?]

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Empathy and adaptability – Important future skills Singaporeans are lacking in

by Robin Low With technology advancing rapidly, there are always people who…

Quick action by policeman saves depressed M’sian teenager from jumping off flyover after her phone was confiscated by her father

A 16-year-old Malaysian girl had attempted to jump off a flyover at…

天然防蚊方法?不妨考虑蚊子天敌之一蜻蜓

我国因为气候炎热,成为滋生蚊子的温床,也出现骨痛热症疫情,因此防蚊工作成为我国相当重要的事项。论最天然的防蚊方法、蚊虫的天敌是什么呢?就是蜻蜓!蜻蜓被视为是控制蚊子数量的其中方法之一,因为他们捕食大量的孑孓,俗称的蚊子幼虫。 《科学时报》曾指出,研究发现,水虿,即指蜻蜓的幼虫,对蚊子的数量产生相当大的影响,他们最活跃的时期在于幼虫期间,但在成年后的蜻蜓仍然可以捕食近100只蚊子。 14蜻蜓品种成濒危物种 那新加坡的蜻蜓种类会多吗?根据国大一项研究透露,我国目前有131种蜻蜓,其中九种已灭绝,现存122种。在122种中,有14种蜻蜓被列为濒危品种,相当珍贵,因此赋予最高级别的保护。 我国蜻蜓看似种类很多,但其实并不然。尽管我们的种类仍然很多,但也可发现出现在我们身边的蜻蜓却不比以往多。另项国大研究则表明,蜻蜓的种类已比较预期的数量更少,据称,部分品种的绝种,尤其是生活在森林环境中的品种,主要原因为过度开发溪流导致边缘植物消失。 毫无疑问地,蜻蜓越发在野外少见,可能是因为池塘数量的减少,以及更多建设与开发,如正在建立公路的武吉布朗,导致他们的自然栖息地遭受破坏。 那我国什么地方蜻蜓最多?答案就是滨海湾公园!读者们可以试试回想,在滨海湾公园可曾被蚊子叮过?新加坡自然学会(The Nature Society)发现滨海南部的蜻蜓多达20种,而滨海东部则有18种。 国大曾发表一篇文章表示,“土地开垦已经破坏了本土的自然生态系统,大量的海岸工程已经在破坏我国红树林森林,目前红树林的覆盖率由最初的13巴仙下降至0.5巴仙,同时珊瑚也面临破坏,目前仅剩下35巴仙。” 蜻蜓数量下降亦相当令人担心,尤其是最近登革热案例的增加。今年7月份,环境局指出我国骨痛热症病例创下三年新高,在7月7日至13日期间竟高达666案例上报。 环境局说,“今年(截至2019年7月13日)共接获7373病例,是去年同时间(1461病例)的5倍。”…

129人涉高利贷活动遭逮捕

一直以来警方致力于打击高利贷活动,近日就有94名男子与35名女子,年龄介于17-82岁涉嫌高利贷活动,于本月8-10日在警方的打击行动中被逮捕。 日前,刑事侦查局(CID)的警员与7名不同分区警察(Police Land Division)在不同区域展开同步缉捕行动,该缉捕行动为期三天。 警方表示,在初步的调查中,已锁定28名嫌犯涉嫌高利贷的跑腿人,负责执行ATM转账业务;另四名嫌犯涉嫌以泼漆和涂鸦在墙上,威胁骚扰受害者。 另外,两名嫌犯涉嫌无牌贷款,以及一名嫌犯涉嫌为提供假信息以取得贷款。剩余的94名嫌犯则涉嫌将银行户口、提款卡与密码给高利贷者作为无牌贷款的用途。 警方指出,目前案件正在进一步调查中。 警方强调涉嫌协助高利贷者开设银行账户、分发小册子、作高利贷者的跑腿人或骚扰行为,均为严重犯罪行为,将依法处置罚款、监禁或鞭笞。针对高利贷活动,警方将严正以待,无论嫌犯在高利贷活动中扮演何种角色,一律面临法律制裁。 根据《放贷人法》(2010年修订),任何人的银行户口或提款卡被发现用以经营无牌贷款,将推定该名用户涉嫌参与高利贷活动。 涉嫌高利贷活动的初犯者,或将面临3万至30万新元的罚款、或监禁最高4年以及6鞭鞭刑 涉嫌经营无牌贷款者或骚扰威胁行为,或将面临5000至5万新元、或监禁最高5年以及3-6鞭鞭刑。 警方表示所有透过信息或网路平台宣传贷款消息都很可能是无牌贷款,因为他们并不如持牌贷款公司能够透过广告宣传贷款服务。…