Mr Lee Tzu Yang, chairman of the Founders’ Memorial Committee (FMC)

According to news reports, plans are underway to build a “Founders’ Memorial” to commemorate Singapore’s founding leaders. Mr Lee Tzu Yang, chairman of the Founders’ Memorial Committee (FMC), has claimed that the memorial will reflect the dilemmas that Singapore’s first generation leaders faced by exemplifying the values and ideals of Singapore. When specifically asked on whether or not the memorial will include anecdotes from the Singaporean diaspora, or dissenting and opposing narratives, Professor Tan Tai Yong, a historian and president and professor of humanities at Yale-NUS College who is part of the Founder’s Memorial Committee said that the intention of the committee is not to “gloss over the complexities” of Singapore in the post-war era. According to him, “It is not our intention to black out or white-wash some parts of history.”

This is not an answer to the question asked at all! Rather, it is a neither here nor there attempt to gloss over the question. The question asked is a direct one that can be simply answered by a yes or no. You are either going to include opposing narratives or you are not. What does “not glossing over the complexities” even mean?

For a Founder’s Memorial to have meaning, it needs to be an accurate representation of our country’s history. Besides the obvious commemoration of the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew, who else will be honoured?  Further, will it honour the contributions made by people who are not members of the Peoples’ Action Party (PAP)?

For example, will it honour the contributions of David Marshall who played a significant role in working towards the independence of Singapore?  How about the part played by Mr Lim Yew Hock who was instrumental in obtaining self rule from the British which in turn paved the way for eventual independence from the Colonial rule? Both of these players were not people who always saw eye to eye with the PAP. Will they be written out of the memorial? Weren’t they leaders of Singapore in their own right?

Unless the memorial makes a comprehensive commemoration of all the key players in our nation’s history (whether they be PAP members or not), the memorial will always be viewed with suspicion.

If the FMC is serious about not blacking out or whitewashing some parts of history, then it will need to deal with some of the less salubrious bits of our history as well. Perhaps, they can start with Operation Cold Store. Can it and will it do that? Just looking at Lee’s non answer, it is hard to tell what he means.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SPP’s Jose Raymond calls out Potong Pasir MP Sitoh Yih Pin on his dengue comments

The Chairman of the Singapore People’s Party Jose Raymond has called out…

Those in First Class are so far removed from the pain and struggles of Economy Class Singaporeans

by Augustine Low There is a segment of Singaporeans who have flown…

Tan Meng Wah urges Singaporeans to consider if 4G leaders work for the interests of Singapore as a whole, or are they working for interests of specific groups of people

As the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) conducted a Meet The People session…

敦马:想谈判水供价格 批川普“善变”  吁警惕自由贸易

邻国首相敦马哈迪认为马新两国1962年水供协议“太贵了”,有意重启谈判。 马哈受上周五(22日)接受《彭博社》专访,谈及新马水供问题,认为”必须与新加坡坐下来,用文明人的方式来商议。“ 在1962年水供协议下,新加坡国家水务局每天从柔佛河抽取2亿5千万加仑生水,价格为每1千加仑0.03令吉(0.01新元)。 马国则可以每1千加仑马币50仙的价格,从新加坡购回2巴仙即5百万加仑的过滤水。 协议在2061年到期。在2016年12月,马国前首相纳吉向新国保证,尽管林桂水坝水位下降,仍会确保提供足够水供于本国。 马哈迪强调,他与包括新加坡等国家,将着重于更平等的贸易关系。“我们双方都能透过合作受惠。马来西亚需要新加坡的人才。也有许多新国人在成本较低的大马投资。” 马哈迪:警惕川普的“善变” 《彭博社》也询问马哈迪对美国总统川普的看法,马哈迪直指后者“善变”,因为后者在与朝鲜领导人金正恩会面一事,一度摇摆不定。 “与这样的人打交道得谨慎。”不过,马哈迪认为,没有人是完美的,你得知道对方的缺点,也要知道他的长处。 相比纳吉的“务实”外交,急着修法配合泛太平洋自由贸易协定,马哈迪则不苟同绝对的自由贸易。他告诉记者,弱国不可能没有任何保护措施,去面对强国竞争。 他认为,没有任何强国应该试图独揽全球局势,现今更应鼓励分享、合作的良好关系。 不主张强国独大…