At a private town hall discussion on 30th September, members of the ‘Ready4Repeal’ movement said that Singapore’s anti-gay law will be repealed in due course. The question is when, not if.

The petition which was authored by filmmaker Glen Goei and legal trainee Johannes Hadi called for the removal of Section 377A of the penal code which criminalises sex between men. The petition closed with over 44,000 signatures.

Lead signatories of the Ready for Repeal petition include many notable names such as Banyan Tree Holdings Executive Chairman and Board of Directors Chairman How Kon Ping and Clair Chiang, social activist Constance Singam, Former PAP politician Darius Cheung, MP Kok Heng Leun, former diplomat Kishore Mahbubani, many high-profile businessmen and women, academics. lawyers and doctors. The petition is also support by a number of various pro-LGBTQ+ NGOs and non-profit organisation such as Action for AIDS, Pink Dot SG, MARUAH, and Humanist Society of Singapore.

The Ministry of Home Affairs have acknowledged their receipt of the petition from Ready4Repeal. However, they have also stated that there are no plans at the moment to repeal that particular law.

The key to change, say Mr Hadi, is for both the LGBT and heterosexual communities to start public engagement now by sharing their personally stories. “Talk to your MPs (Members of Parliament) – educate them, encourage them to listen.”

Other speakers at the event also stressed the importance of making your voice heard. “Share your stories on what it’s like to be LGBT in Singapore, and how 377A affects you,” said Mr Clement Tan of Pink Dot SG who was also at the town hall.

Another speaker and signatory, lawyer Remy Choo, addressed the legal challenges of repealing 377A. He pointed out that even the British from whom Singapore inherited this law knows that it is a bad legislation, having decriminalised gay sex in the 1960s. Mr Choo said that 377A ‘belongs in the dustbin of legal history’, adding that “The defence of marriage; the slippery slope; religious freedom – these are red herrings. What we are trying to repeal is bad colonial legislation.”

Also present were former Association of Women for Action and Research (AWARE) President Constance Singam, also a signatory of the repeal petition. She urged the audience to continue fighting for a change in the value system of Singaporean society. It is not only about signing petitions, but to affect change means to be an activist every day.

After the town hall, which was held at SMU, Mr Hadi said “It’s a matter of when 377A will change, not if. But when it does, we hope Singaporeans will be ready for it. We don’t want them to be unprepared or alienated by it.”

So far, the National Council of Churches in Singapore (NCCS), Alliance of the Pentecostal-Charismatic Churches of Singapore, and the Archbishop of the Catholic Church in Singapore have all come out against repealing 377A, citing the preservation of traditional family values and the sanctity of marriage as God intended.

From the government, Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam noted that while Singapore is divided on the issue, the laws have to be in line with societal views and it is up to Singapore society to dictate the direction.

Also, Education Minister Ong Ye Kung came out to say that there was no discrimination against the LGBT community in the areas of work, housing and education.

However as stated in a letter by Action for AIDS President Roy Chan, the LGBT community does in fact experience homophobia, both internal and external, which stems from laws like 377A that perpetuate this singular idea of sexual orientation. So even though on the surface it may seem that the LGBT community is being embrace in Singapore thanks to the annual Pink Dot rallies, the existence of 377A itself promotes homophobia which in turn leads to rampant discrimination.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Pwee Foundation's 1st year Anniversary: Helping NGOs and social enterprises to stand on their own

(Photo: Benjamin Pwee address the guests of the foundation’s 1st Anniversary dinner)…

Maggots found inside mini chicken sausage bun from Four Leaves

A Facebook post of a bun sold by Four Leaves which was…

公共综合诊所看诊费 未津贴前贵过私人诊所?

医疗服务一直以来都是全球人民与政治人物关注重要议题,我国也不例外。事实上,我国医疗服务一直被世界各国赞赏,人民与永久公民均能享用合理的医疗服务。 卫生部之所以能够长期维持实惠经济的医疗费用,全凭3项措施-医疗保健(MediSave)、终身健保(MediShield)、保健基金(MediFund),人民只需要自付低价医疗费用。 卫生部曾在脸书上表示,“新加坡一直以来以建立方便、实惠、品质保证的医疗保健为目标。”文中指出,新加坡的医疗保健旨在确保“每个人都能够在不同层次的医疗中,享用合时、经济实惠及完美无缺的服务”。 然而近年来,各种措施与政策使医疗费用节节上升,造成人民怨声载道。《新加坡商业评论》(Singapore Business Review)指出,“医疗费用的提升大大削弱了新加坡作为医疗观光中心的吸引力,而开始转向邻国解决医疗需求”。 回到2014年,前副总理尚曼达曾表示政府预计医疗消费直至2020年将增长三倍,从2011年的40亿到2020年120亿。据卫生部的网站显示,医疗消费于2018年已达92亿9千万新元,比起上一年的86亿4千万新元,足足多了6亿元左右。 医疗消费迅速膨胀的缘故与我国人口老化逐渐上升,但仍另有其他说法。《商业时报》(Business times SG)指,除了人口老化,使用医疗服务的劳工族群也相当多,造成其医疗消费上升。汇丰银行(HSBC)续指,新加坡于2030年,新加坡老年人口将会是年轻劳动工作者的两倍,对于未来医疗消费会有长远的影响。 副总理王瑞杰不断强调新加坡人需要多注重健康的生活,才能在日后避免负担更重的医疗消费,该说法显然将减轻医疗消费的重担放在人民身上。 总理李显龙也曾提及,政府必须更谨慎处理医疗补助事宜,这不仅仅是为纳税人省钱,更是提倡不应过度治疗和过度消费医疗服务。…