Source: Lianhe Wanbao

The Singapore citizenship of Mr Xu, a 23-year-old Thai-born youth, was revoked after his alleged failure to complete the Oath of Renunciation, Allegiance and Loyalty (ORAL) within the stipulated deadline of one year.

It was alleged by Mr Xu, who was born to a Singaporean father and a Thai mother, that the failure to take up the ORAL was due to the rejection of his requests to seek leave during his National Service (NS) term, according to Lianhe Wanbao.

“At the time, I was serving NS, and my requests for leave were rejected. I was thus unable to complete my ORAL in time, and ICA revoked my citizenship on Sep 5 last year,” he said.

He narrated: “Two years ago, I was called to serve NS. I just turned 21 on Sep 5 in the same year when I received a letter from the ICA.

“The letter said that I was an underage citizen who attained my citizenship either through application or via biological ties to a Singaporean parent. As such, I had to complete my ORAL within a year to keep my citizenship,” he lamented.

“All my family members are in Singapore and I don’t want to leave them. I have been trying to think of ways to regain my citizenship,” he said apprehensively.

“The last time I went to ICA to reapply for citizenship, it was rejected, but I intend to try again.

Hopefully, they will let me stay in Singapore, and allow me to contribute to the society,” he concluded.

He also highlighted that he went to Thailand to obtain the required documents before he could visit the Thai embassy in Singapore to renounce his Thai citizenship.

Currently, Mr Xu requires a Special Pass in order to remain in Singapore, which must be extended every three months.

Should he fail to obtain renewal for his Special Pass, Mr Xu will be asked to leave Singapore.

The process of renunciation of an applicant’s current citizenship, which may take up a month to a year, typically begins with the applicant’s visit to the embassy of the country of which he is currently a citizen of.

Then, a Renunciation Letter regarding the foreign citizenship will be given to the applicant.

Subsequently, the applicant has the obligation to present the original renunciation letter and a photocopy of said letter at the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) office as a pre-requisite for taking the ORAL.

MINDEF alleges that Xu did not apply for leave from NS

The Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) has denied Mr Xu’s allegations, stating that he did not apply for leave, nor did he submit relevant documents needed for his application for leave at any time throughout his time in NS.

It was only in July last year, two months before the one-year deadline, that Mr Xu had allegedly started applying for leave.

Mr Xu served a Section commander responsible for training new recruits until Sep 9 last year.

However, it had surpassed the one-year mark stipulated by the ICA.

“If he had submitted the relevant documents, the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) would have fully supported him,” according to a MINDEF spokesperson.

This, however, suggests that Mr Xu did apply for leave, but was not granted the leave he had requested.

ICA alleges that Xu did not follow up with reminders

The ICA said that in order to retain their citizenship, underage citizens who manage to receive Singapore citizenship via their parentage or via application are obliged to take up the ORAL once they reach the age of 21.

An ICA spokesperson stated that the Authority had informed Mr Xu regarding the necessary procedures for the ORAL through a letter before he turned 21.

Another letter was sent six months before his 22nd birthday to remind him of the necessary procedures, added the spokesperson.

The ICA spokesperson stressed that the question of citizenship is a grave one, considering that in Singapore law, a person’s citizenship cannot be sought again once it has been revoked.

The spokesperson noted that the Authority was reassessing Mr Xu’s application for Singapore citizenship.

Netizens infuriated by the apparent unfairness of Xu’s situation

Many netizens were outraged by Mr Xu’s predicament and sympathised with him, highlighting the fact that he completed his stint in NS unlike a handful of other citizens and PRs.

 Wood Peter said:
A stateless person…sad !
 Vikki Ang wrote:
He served NS, which can’t be said for a lot of other new citizens and PRs.
 Laurence Lim commented:
“Foreign Talent” not born to Singaporeans are able to get citizenship without any problems, yet this one completed NS and still has to go through so much trouble… Something is not right…
 AK Tan wrote:
This is our civil service – lacking in empathy, simply following procedures, no accountability, and won’t hesitate to make your life a living hell. Where the heck is the “service”? Time for Singaporeans to break some iron rice bowl with your votes!
 Michael Wong said:
Singapore needs people like him… Please do something good, Mr Lee Hsien Loong!
However, Stan Chiam believes that the Government is not to blame, and that he suggests that Mr Xu was negligent in keeping up with the deadline in this case:
Doing things last minute has it consequences. Only when he found out how serious it is then start crying over spilt milk.
If he knew his citizenship will be revoked, and yet still did not take action promptly and do things at the very last minute, then serves him right!
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

S’pore should seriously study minimum wage as complement to PWM, says MAS chief

Singapore may seriously consider studying a modest minimum wage as a complement…

Sarawak to open Trade & Tourism Office at Robinson Road this week

The Sarawak Trade and Tourism Office on Robinson Road, Singapore will hold…

自7月15日起,计程车私召车可安装录音功能摄像机

自7月15日起,计程车和私召车可安装具备录音功能的朝车内录摄像机。 陆交局周二(2日)表示,录音功能将“对车内发生的不宜或暴力行为,以及因票价发生的争议之侦查工作有所帮助”。 然而,在不足两个月前,陆交局曾允许使用摄像机,但需具备不录音功能的摄像机保证乘客对话不会被录音。 陆交局也引用民情联系组(REACH)近日的调查,结果显示每10位中就有9位认为朝车内录摄像机可保障司机和乘客的权益。另外,10位调查者中就有9位认为摄像机需安装上录影录音双功能。 所有巴士却不受新规则的规定,尽管巴士仍需遵从个人资料保护委员会(Personal Data Protection Commission)的指引。Go Ahead集团、新捷运、新加坡地铁、武林巴士车厂旗下的公共巴士与其他公司的私人巴士(通常使用与载送自家员工),可获免除。 陆交局表示,“因为巴士如同公共空间,而且是多名乘客与之共享的地方”。 基于新订规则,凡提供计公共搭乘服务的计程车、私召车司机或业者,均需获得当局批准方能安装朝车内拍摄的摄像机。 当局表示,目前有三家可安装陆交局认证的摄像机:i…

讽刺视频风波:警方向网红“美丽求求你”发24个月有条件警告

网红“美丽求求你”普丽蒂和其兄苏巴什,因上月拍摄讽刺视频而遭警方介入调查,警方向网红兄妹发出24个月的有条件警告。 警方今日(14日)发文告,表示据刑罚第298 A(a),已触犯伤害种族感情的罪行。 警方表示,若未及时针对类似视频采取行动,这种充满侮辱和不尊重的视频将会被视为允许散播。而过去数周,因为相关课题已引起种族间的压力,尤其是马来族群和印度族群,或许会更受伤害。 然而,针对电子支付广告的内容,警方则指出,经询问总检查署之意见,表示并无涉及任何刑事触法,警方将不会采取任何行动。 对此,今日(14日)普丽蒂则于脸书发表声明表示该争议也告一个段落,并希望不管是试图加深肤色或调侃视频都不应该再次出现。 普丽蒂于感谢试图理解视频欲表达的意图,以及过去两周内提供任何协助,并呼吁试图诋毁他们的网民消停。 她表示,能够理解为何有些人对于视频感到相当冒犯,所以她只希望类似的事情不要再发生。 最后表明,有电子支付广告的照片是在7月28日拍摄。 针对视频拍摄,网民褒贬不一 上月,电子支付广告聘用新加坡华裔周崇庆为反串角色,扮演四个不同种族,包含可以加深肤色扮演一名印度男子,以及穿戴头巾的女子,引起社会关注。当中也引起少数民族的抗议。 电子支付广告公布不久后,网红普丽蒂与其兄便拍摄视频调侃,内容被指充斥着对新加坡华裔的侮辱性语言与咒骂。普丽蒂在视频内表示打扮成印度人不好笑也看起来很傻,至少可以选用不同的人拍广告;至于她的哥哥苏巴什则揶揄“干嘛要妒忌他的肤色”,而怎么选谁都是华人赢;再者上一次屠妖节还有华人打扮成锡克族,令他感到受不了。…