I know that many before me have bemoaned the raise  in the prices of our utilities and I am sorry to raise it yet again. However, unlike the more esteemed commentators, I will not be dealing with facts and figures. People far better than me have already presented these facts and figures very informatively. Instead, I will focus my attention on the sentiments of such an increase.

It has been commonly raised by Singaporeans how expensive it is to live in Singapore and how the middle classes feel very squeezed. Given the state’s believe in the “many hands” approach to aid, many middle class families are in a position whereby they have to provide for both their aged parents and their children. It is within this tight setting that the prices of both our water and our electricity have been hiked.

It is not even that Singaporeans have a wide choice of utility providers from which to choose from.  Competition within the supply of electricity is at its infancy in Singapore and water comes only from Public Utilities Board (PUB). This means that even if Singaporeans oppose the increase, there is not much they can do to change the situation. Electricity and water are basic necessities – what choice is there but to suck it up?

By allowing double price hikes (both on water and electricity) on the same day is surely not just insensitive but a slap in the face for Singaporeans who are already feeling the heat to make ends meet.

6.9% and 15% increments (in electricity and water respectively) are not low increases. In fact, I would say that it is pretty significant especially for households who already have difficulty putting aside a little for a rainy day. Is the government completely blind to the struggles of the common man? If you want Singaporeans to be able to support their families without aid from the state, surely they need to have savings?

I understand that increments may be necessary over time but there should be a limit in how much the raise can be. Perhaps not more than 3% for at least 24 months and not for both utilities at the same time? I have pulled this figure from the top of my head and I defer to experts on a more accurate figure but my basic point is this – The government cannot allow a scenario whereby prices can be raised sharply and suddenly in close proximity on basic necessities.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Home Affairs Minister’s reply still doesn’t explain how Teo Chee Hean knew of ongoing investigations against LHY and LSF

The Minister for Home Affairs and Law, K Shanmugam, explained the government’s approach to revealing the names of people under police investigation, specifically in the case of Lee Hsien Yang and Mrs Lee Suet Fern. The Minister clarified that the two had not been issued any order under the CPC to attend any investigations but had absconded from police investigation. His explanation, however, does not clarify how Mr Teo, whose portfolio has nothing to do with law enforcement, learned of the ongoing investigations against LHY and LSF. The use of the word “abscond” by the Minister is also troubling, and it is unclear why an offense is being suggested when the police did not issue an order for LHY and LSF to attend the interview.

The Six Degrees of Separation in the Liew Mun Leong and Parti Liyani case

As the saying goes – “Six Degrees of Separation”. Does this ring…

Malaysian political activist: PAP risks falling like BN if it starts to believe too much in its own propaganda

In an opinion piece for Malaysiakini entitled ‘The fallacy of Singaporean exceptionalism‘ on…

Electricity up: U-Save enough?

by Leong Sze Hian I refer to the article “Get up to…